Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🇺🇸Канал Марши. Карьера в США

Channel

🇺🇸Канал Марши. Карьера в США

@jobsearch_usa

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,816subscribers

+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527179027
TypeChannel
Username@jobsearch_usa
Created25 June 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jobsearch_usa

Growth

4,8014,8164,808.56 August 2026 — 4,801 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,801 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,805 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,816 subscribers13 August 2026 — 4,808 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,816 subscribers6 August 202619 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 13 days, net +15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,799–4,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Aug 2026, 12:464,816+8
13 Aug 2026, 08:534,808-8
9 Aug 2026, 22:114,816+11
6 Aug 2026, 14:554,805+4
6 Aug 2026, 04:454,801no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:384,801first reading

Engagement

24 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
19.3%
avg views ÷ 4,816 subscribers
Avg views / post
928
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.95%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 24 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held24 (6 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total12,987
Reactions total337
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

600 reactions across 21 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥24641.0%
23138.5%
👍396.50%
😢274.50%
💯172.83%
😱91.50%
🤗91.50%
👀50.833%
💩40.667%
🍾30.5%
❤‍🔥20.333%
👨‍💻20.333%
😁20.333%
👎10.167%
🤡10.167%
🥰10.167%
🥱10.167%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 600reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC426 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Спам от производителей софта в канале. Прежде чем ставить на свой ноутбук любой стороннее решение, которое помогает проходить интервью. Подумайте два раза, так ли вы хотите расстаться со своими банковскими счетами. В сторах есть уже есть похожие приложения с таким функционалом: Cluely. Это хоть какая-то гарантия, что Apple проверил разработчика.

😱31🤡1

Signed Marsha Podolyak

11 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC585 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Пять лет спустя я понимаю, почему меня не брали на работу 😂 Мне тут прислали резюме, и я внезапно узнала себя пятилетней давности. Именно с таким резюме я когда-то искала работу в США. И даже интервью практически не получала. И дело было не только в том, что я плохо понимала американский рынок или у меня не было local experience. Мое резюме буквально кричало: Я МОГУ ВСЁ. ВООБЩЕ ВСЁ. Marketing strategy? Могу. Pr

21👍10🔥1🥱1

Signed Marsha Podolyak

10 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTC649 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

У вас написаны STAR истории?

  1. Да, написаны ⚡️44%
  2. Нет, я фристайла 💬41%
  3. Впервые слышу про STAR 👀12%
  4. Свой ответ в комментарии 👇🏻3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Marsha Podolyak

10 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC657 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как часть полного пакета подготовки кандидата я теперь готовлю кандидатам список STAR-историй под вашу конкретную позицию. Мы будем вместе их писать: я проверю, дам обратную связь. И я бы вообще не начинала активный поиск работы в США, пока вы не понимаете, что такое STAR и не подготовили хотя бы базовый набор историй. ‼️Если вы регулярно проходите recruiter screen, но дальше заваливаетесь на hiring manager, очень

20🔥7💯4

Signed Marsha Podolyak

7 Aug 2026, 18:36 UTC830 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Culture fit — это не «понравиться интервьюеру». И не умение обсуждать fantasy football. Хотя иногда и это тоже lol. Два кандидата могут иметь практически одинаковый hard skills match. Один отвечает на каждый технический вопрос идеально, но разговор с ним похож на допрос. Второй где-то не знает идеального технического ответа, зато умеет рассуждать, нормально разговаривает, задает вопросы, понимает бизнес и с ним хоч

🔥84👍3

Signed Marsha Podolyak

6 Aug 2026, 14:48 UTC904 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как понять, что резюме — полный отстой? В канале Анны Наумовой ProdCast я провела несколько абсолютно бесплатных разносов резюме. И даже не взяла 10% вашего будущего оффера, представляете. Самый очевидный признак, что с резюме что-то очень не так: вы сделали около 100 подач и не получили ни одного recruiter screening. Нормальным результатом я бы считала примерно три скрининга на 100 релевантных подач. Очень хороши

🔥167👍1

Signed Marsha Podolyak

5 Aug 2026, 21:00 UTC≈1,040 views31 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🍂 Горячая пора найма в США начинается. Во многих штатах на этой неделе дети пошли в школу. Для рынка труда это тоже своеобразное “1 сентября”: после летних отпусков рекрутеры и hiring managers возвращаются к активному найму. Если вы планируете менять работу в этом году, то сейчас одно из лучших окон возможностей. Почему? До конца октября у вас есть хороший шанс пройти полный цикл интервью до сезона Thanksgiving и

20🔥11

Signed Marsha Podolyak

4 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTC913 viewsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Какой сервис сравнения резюме и вакансии вы используете?

  1. Simplify5%
  2. Teal6%
  3. JobScan14%
  4. Никакой69%
  5. Свой ответ в комментарии ⬇️6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Signed Marsha Podolyak

4 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC≈1,290 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Где искать вакансии, кроме LinkedIn? 14 июля 2026 года генеральный прокурор Техаса Кен Пакстон начал официальное расследование LinkedIn из-за возможной рекламы и монетизации ghost jobs, вакансий, которые уже закрыты, не существуют или которые компания не собирается заполнять. Офис прокурора запросил у LinkedIn документы, внутренние переписки и данные о рекламе Premium, проверке вакансий и заявлениях платформы о каче

🔥166👍2

Signed Marsha Podolyak

3 Aug 2026, 21:47 UTC875 views15 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Кто ваш покупатель на рынке труда в США? Кстати, я как-то совсем пропустила, что таким покупателем может быть компания, с которой вы говорите на одном языке. Культурная принадлежность как value proposition. К сожалению, зачастую кандидат не может найти других рычагов в первые годы иммиграции кроме знания русского языка и культурных особенностей. И это тоже нормально. Самое главное, понять, что вы выстраиваете пут

🔥14😁1

Signed Marsha Podolyak

3 Aug 2026, 17:38 UTC928 views32 reactionsread 12 August 2026

💰Market yourself — одна из самых странных фраз, которую постоянно повторяют в США. Если перевести дословно: «продай себя». Но на самом деле речь не о том, чтобы себя расхваливать. Речь о том, чтобы понимать свою рыночную стоимость. Кандидат, который умеет market himself, может за 30 секунд объяснить: 👉🏻какую ценность он приносит бизнесу 👉🏻какие проблемы умеет решать 👉🏻задачи какого уровня хочет брать на себя 👉🏻гд

🔥236👍3

Signed Marsha Podolyak

24 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,340 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Еще одно напоминание себе (и вам) про корпоративную политику. Любая хорошая идея в большой компании начинается не со звонка и не с сообщения в Teams. Она начинается с презентации. Очень часто люди думают: «Сейчас расскажу коллегам, обсудим, а потом оформим». На практике все происходит наоборот. Если идея ценная, то после пары обсуждений уже сложно вспомнить, кто был ее автором. В корпоративной среде презентация

55💯13😢3👎1

Signed Marsha Podolyak

Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @jobsearch_usa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

10 Aug 2026, 16:43 UTCAnonymous Poll116 voters

У вас написаны STAR истории?

  1. Да, написаны ⚡️44%
  2. Нет, я фристайла 💬41%
  3. Впервые слышу про STAR 👀12%
  4. Свой ответ в комментарии 👇🏻3%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4 Aug 2026, 20:29 UTCAnonymous Poll506 voters

Какой сервис сравнения резюме и вакансии вы используете?

  1. Simplify5%
  2. Teal6%
  3. JobScan14%
  4. Никакой69%
  5. Свой ответ в комментарии ⬇️6%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Jul 2026, 14:09 UTCAnonymous Poll116 voters

Почему никто не выложил пост о поиске работы? Ваши гипотезы

  1. Кандидаты стесняются51%
  2. Искать работу зазорно16%
  3. Не знают, что писать24%
  4. Понедельник, отстань, Марша32%
  5. Свой ответ в комментарии 👇🏻2%

The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Jul 2026, 21:05 UTCAnonymous Poll212 voters

Моя эмоциональная реакция на воровство моих материалов

  1. Лол 🤣27%
  2. Месть 🔥42%
  3. Ладно, пустая башка, дозволяю 💚 Сам ничего придумать не можешь - увольнения кругом, а у тебя жена22%
  4. Обида, навозный жук 🪲21%
  5. Свой ответ в комментарии3%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 420,944 of 1,566,395entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Connectable Jobs
@zarubezhom_jobs · 100,211
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🇺🇸Канал Марши. Карьера в США” (@jobsearch_usa), 4,816 subscribers as measured 19 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jobsearch_usa.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.