Um dos melhores episódios de podcasts que já participei! Se você quer entender minha visão pro futuro do marketing nos próximos 5 anos, não deixe de assistir! 👉🏻 https://youtu.be/IkhsWUBbHgQ
❤34👍14🖕6😁3🫡2

Channel
@joaopedro
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
9,027subscribers
-10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001491280970 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @joaopedro |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/joaopedro |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 11:52 | 9,027 | -11 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:17 | 9,038 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:00 | 9,037 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 9,037 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,140 reactions across 18 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 493 | 43.2% | |
| 👍 | 333 | 29.2% | |
| 🔥 | 101 | 8.86% | |
| 👏 | 53 | 4.65% | |
| 😢 | 45 | 3.95% | |
| 👎 | 28 | 2.46% | |
| 🖕 | 16 | 1.40% | |
| 🤔 | 11 | 0.965% | |
| ❤🔥 | 9 | 0.789% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 0.789% | |
| 💯 | 7 | 0.614% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 0.614% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 0.526% | |
| 👨💻 | 4 | 0.351% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.351% | |
| 🌚 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.175% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.175% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.088% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,140reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 27 December 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Um dos melhores episódios de podcasts que já participei! Se você quer entender minha visão pro futuro do marketing nos próximos 5 anos, não deixe de assistir! 👉🏻 https://youtu.be/IkhsWUBbHgQ
❤34👍14🖕6😁3🫡2
Pessoal, só lembrando que dá para dar 1 voto por dia 🙏
👍63❤51👎15👏9🖕7
Estou concorrendo ao prêmio iBest na categoria melhor influenciador de marketing digital! Votar é super rápido e seria massa demais estar no TOP 10! 👉🏻 https://ibest.vote/196173930 (se vc usa iPhone o jeito mais rápido é logando pela Apple)
👍59❤42👏6🖕3👎2
Muita gente me pergunta “o que eu leio sobre marketing” e estou aqui pra compartilhar um conteúdo que eu li recentemente que achei muito alto nível. Eu tenho lido muitas newsletters gringas, que tem um conteúdo muito diferente do que a gente costuma ver no Brasil e nas redes sociais. Fica aqui um post de uma das newsletters que eu acompanho que achei muito bom, ele fala sobre como o Duolingo conseguiu reinventar su…
👍61🔥44❤17❤🔥9👏7💯5👨💻4👎3
AO VIVO AGORA 👉🏻 https://www.youtube.com/live/BZ78yWbESag
👍18👏6❤4👎2
Qual a diferença do TikTok para o Instagram no olhar de marketing? Parece responder essa pergunta a gente tem olhar a forma como os usuários usam cada rede. Por mais que ambas redes tenham vídeos curtos, o motivo pelo qual as pessoas entram em cada uma delas é muito diferente. Isso inclusive, explica o motivo das empresas em geral terem mais ROI direto no Instagram do que investindo no TikTok. 💬 Assiste aí e come…
❤14👍13👏6👎3🤮1😁1
Creators vs Marcas 👉🏻 https://youtu.be/Y9DLxnczJKY
❤9👍7🥰4
Participei do podcast ROI HUNTERS da Infomoney essa semana e foi muito massa. Falei sobre como acredito que o futuro do marketing são os creators - e como as empresas podem aprender com eles a terem maiores conversões. E obviamente que não poderia deixar de contar o case do Mr. Beast, que a pessoa que eu mais estudei nos últimos anos. Esse inclusive é um tema frequente que tenho batido nas minhas palestras então s…
❤17👍5👏4🔥4💯2
Eu consegui algo inédito que vocês nem vão acreditar hahah O Instagram me pediu pra gravar alguns vídeos pra eles publicarem no TikTok oficial da plataforma (sim) e também na conta @Creators lá no Insta! O primeiro saiu e ficaria muito feliz se vocês dessem uma força comentando lá no TikTok 🥰 👉🏻 https://vm.tiktok.com/ZMYNd7ChX/
❤50👍14👏6🔥5🎉3
Você sabe o que é um diferencial? Sabe de verdade? 👀 Deixa seu comentário aqui que ajuda muito na propagação do vídeo! 👉🏻 https://www.instagram.com/reel/CmAWH3NPaoX/
❤13👍7🔥2
Video, posted without a caption
👍29❤18👎3
Zapeando pelo Tiktok eu vi esse vídeo. Achei massa compartilhar aqui com vocês pq vai mto com o que eu falei no Instagram ontem: não existe conteúdo ruim, existe conteúdo que você não gosta. Muita gente tem preconceito com os vídeos de dancinha, mas não entendem que na real é um conteúdo difícil pra kct de se fazer e que agrada a um público alvo específico - muito grande, diga-se de passagem. Enfim, olha o vídeo a…
🔥20❤14👍4🌚3👏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @joaopedro. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Se importem de eu mandar um áudio aqui? Sinto que a nossa relação aqui é diferente, que estou entre amigos
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 April 2022 to 27 December 2024. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“João Pedro Motta” (@joaopedro), 9,027 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/joaopedro.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.