Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

萝莉伪娘男娘2

@jnrnf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003500513947
TypeChannel
Username@jnrnf
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 30 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jnrnf

Growth

313 Aug 2026, 15:47 — 3 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 18:38 — 3 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 15:4713 Aug 2026, 18:38
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–4 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 18:383no change
13 Aug 2026, 15:473first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 10 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.3%
avg views ÷ 3 subscribers
Avg views / post
1.0
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held15 (10 August 202613 August 2026)
Views total15
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 18:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
98
Videos
283

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2h 32m
Average length
10m 09s

Measured directly from 15 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 00:33 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

◤那抹奶白,是否沁人心脾◢ ─────── 博主: TAG: 简评:昔日那软萌猫爪惹人怜,修长肉棒在手间肆意揉搓,终是喷射出温润如丝的乳液 [会员群已更新全套完整版279V] #猫爪呸罗 #TS #伪娘 #男娘

13 Aug 2026, 00:15 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

青涩伪娘初尝露出,羞态撩人 简介:JK少女小懒裙摆飞扬,前后内裤若隐若现。凉风拂过肌肤,快感蔓延,她天生便是渴求被发现的露出骚货,渴望众人见证她的淫靡本色。 #露出 #伪娘 #户外

13 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

绝美伪娘激情肉战 简介:怎能抗拒双伪娘的亲密缠绵?高颜值的他仰面承受,肉棒倒抽榨出乳汁,随后狠狠贯穿,猛烈撞击菊穴 #伪娘 #男娘 #肛交 #可爱

13 Aug 2026, 00:11 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

御姐人妖私密合集 简介:绝美御姐妖艳动人,熟韵撩人至极,一眼沦陷,仿佛能瞬间将你灵魂与身体彻底榨干。 #人妖 #TS #合集 #御姐

13 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

萌妖视频挑逗肉棒 简介:娇俏美妖裸聊,展示绯红睾丸与娇嫩菊穴 #人妖 #TS #裸聊 #可爱

12 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

日系伪娘精选 简介:三合一合集,日系伪娘颜值爆表,虽带马赛克,却更添朦胧诱惑,美得惊心动魄。 标签: #伪娘 #合集 #可爱 #男娘

12 Aug 2026, 02:38 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

大奈反差TS妖姬 简介:谁能抵挡大奈手持仙女棒的绝美诱惑,光是想象便让人血脉偾张 #反差 #人妖 #TS #伪娘

12 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Photo

◤周末与绝美妖精缠绵,沉醉于她柔嫩双唇的吸吮◢ ─────── 博主: TAG: 简评:若被这般尤物舔舐,销魂滋味简直无法想象,令人欲罢不能。 #Felicia #伪娘 #男娘 #TS

12 Aug 2026, 02:31 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

◤ 御姐妖姬的绝美远射◢ ─────── 博主: TAG: 简评: 这力道太猛,直接滋在玻璃上 #未知 #TS #伪娘 #男娘

12 Aug 2026, 02:29 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

美眸凝视,深情献吻 简介:娇弱美妖含情脉脉,灵动双眼紧锁你身,边看边吞吐,极致诱惑 #人妖 #TS #高颜值

10 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

街头魅惑,伪娘慵懒当众展露 简介:懒懒在街边肆意展示那根软趴趴的鸡巴,指尖轻捻自慰。偶有外卖小哥路过,她便故意大张双腿,任其饱览。如今在众目睽睽下裸露已习以为常,那份人前失禁的羞耻感,真是让人欲罢不能。 标签: #露出 #伪娘 #男娘 #户外

10 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC1 viewsread 13 August 2026
Video

绝美妖姬独享欢愉 简介:天呐,这颜值简直逆天!高冷御姐TS自慰,一手揉弄肉棒,一手探索菊穴,极致诱惑 #高颜值 #人妖 #TS #反差

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @jnrnf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,342,157 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“萝莉伪娘男娘2” (@jnrnf), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jnrnf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.