Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for JK IELTS

Channel

JK IELTS

@jkielts

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,398subscribers

-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001631953590
TypeChannel
Username@jkielts
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jkielts

Growth

3,3983,4133,405.57 August 2026 — 3,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,413 subscribers7 August 2026 — 3,412 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,406 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,398 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -15. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,396–3,415 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 09:383,398-8
10 Aug 2026, 21:023,406-6
7 Aug 2026, 21:213,412-1
7 Aug 2026, 06:453,413no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:393,413first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 2 December 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

149 reactions across 12 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13187.9%
🔥85.37%
👍42.68%
🕊21.34%
😁21.34%
10.671%
👏10.671%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 149reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 2 December 2025 to 28 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jan 2026, 07:08 UTC≈1,780 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

This year, people born in 1996 feel like Joey :)

16🔥7🕊2😁2👏1

30 Dec 2025, 07:56 UTC≈2,380 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Laziza is another exceptional student who pulled off an overall 7.0 with writing 7.0 in her first attempt🚀 (just like Inobat who also got 7.0 for writing) Listening 8.0💣 Reading 7.0🔥 Writing 7.0🔥 Speaking 6.0😎

18👍1

30 Dec 2025, 07:47 UTC≈1,870 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Dasha also studied with me on and off since General English. She is an astute student and a good self-learner as she was trying to use different phrases that we didn't cover during our lessons. First attempt: Overall 7.0 ✅ Listening 7.0 🚀 Reading 6.5 😎 Writing 6.5 😎 Speaking 7.0 🚀

14

30 Dec 2025, 07:35 UTC≈1,400 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Another Aziz with an overall 7.0🔥, I guess Azizs rule😄 He was a little self-doubting about his speaking despite having a very good speaking skill, but as expected, he achieved a decent score for this section as well. First attempt: Overall 7.0 ✅ Listening 8.0🔥 Reading 6.5😎 Writing 6.0🤩 Speaking 7.0🚀

12

30 Dec 2025, 07:22 UTC≈1,200 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ismoil studied in my general English and IELTS groups but could not finish the course fully with me, yet he pulled of a decent 7.0🔥 Listening 8.0🚀 Reading 7.5💣 Writing 6.5😎 Speaking 6.5😎

9

30 Dec 2025, 07:15 UTC960 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ibrohim is another bright student who got an overall 7.0 in his first attempt🔥 Listening 7.0🚀 Reading 7.0✊ Writing 6.0😎 Speaking 7.0💣 It seems easy to get 7.0 huh? But it takes hard work and patience 😎❗️

11

30 Dec 2025, 07:08 UTC902 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

This is Inobat's groupmate Aziz who I jokingly called "doctor" as he is a medical student, and as a decent med student he was a pretty hard-working guy during my lessons. First attempt: Overall 7.0 🔥 Listening 7.0 🚀 Reading 7.5🥳 Writing 6.5 😎 Speaking 6.5😎

7

30 Dec 2025, 06:57 UTC894 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

A diligent and patient student Inobat. She studied in my group from freaking elementary!😃 Any learner knows that it's really challenging to study in one place from zero to hero✅ First attempt: Overall 7.0📈 Listening 7.0💣 Writing 7.0🔥🔥 Speaking 6.5🚀 Reading 6.5🚀 P.S. The nice guy on the left is my support teacher, who also contributed a lot to my students' acedemic results😎

13

30 Dec 2025, 06:45 UTC≈1,140 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

#results Very young and smart girl Malika🥳 First attempt: Overall 7.0🚀 Reading 8.0💣 Listening 7.5🔥 Speaking 6.5🤩 Writing 6.0👍

8🔥1

30 Dec 2025, 06:35 UTC945 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Before starting to work for a different organization, I used to post students' IELTS results quite often and I collected them on this channel @jkielts_results. I kinda stopped posting such results since here I had to teach from general English to IELTS, not IELTS only. Now some of my very first groups here have taken their tests and received decent results. I guess it's time to post some results again... :)

6

2 Dec 2025, 16:45 UTC≈1,500 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Task 1. The line graph compares how the rates of three various types of crime (burglary, car theft and robbery) changed over a period of nine years, from 2010 to 2019. Overall, the most noticeable changes occurred in the figures for burglary and car theft, while it was robbery that experienced the least significant change. Interestingly, although burglary topped the list initially, car theft had become the most com

12👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @jkielts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 87,464 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“JK IELTS” (@jkielts), 3,398 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jkielts.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.