Channel
@jiuyou449
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,535subscribers
+13 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1002122592574 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jiuyou449 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiuyou449 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 10,535 | +10 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 10,525 | +3 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 10,522 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 8 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (8 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 16,772 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 8 August 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
【九游-8月16日 22点整 英社盾 阿森纳 vs 曼城】 #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据方面机构对于两队支持力度均不明显，盘口仅仅开出双方平手盘方向。阿森纳近年整体竞争力不俗，攻防体系也较为成熟，不过面对曼城时往往需要承受较大控球和进攻压力。曼城阵容深度出色，中前场创造力和比赛掌控能力依旧值得信赖，关键场次经验也更加丰富。此役双方实力接近，但曼城在中场控制及前场终结方面更具优势，预计能够通过稳定的控球和持续施压寻找机会。综合来看，本场看好曼城客场取胜。 全场让球：曼城[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：0-1
【九游-8月16日 15点整 LPL LGD vs 北京JDG】 #电竞 数据初盘开出全局获胜：[email protected]/北京[email protected]，机构更倾向于北京JDG的优势。北京JDG目前以5胜4负、+1净胜分稳居登峰组第4位，队伍整体运营扎实且中后期执行力极佳。LGD则以2胜7负、-6净胜分暂居登峰组第7位，近期虽偶有爆冷表现，但在面对顶级强队的前期压迫时整体稳定性依然不足。从双方近10场单局数据来看，北京JDG以90%的绝对胜率处于统治地位，同时还拥有高达70%的一血率。并在近5场大局交锋中全胜。展现出极其高效的前期线上侵略性与野区寻敌节奏。综合分析本场看好北京JDG凭借绝对的数据对位优势与更稳定的团队运营击败LGD。 首局一血：北京[email protected] 首局击杀让分：北京[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小：小[email protected]
【九游-8月16日 3点30分 西甲 塞维利亚 vs 巴列卡诺】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据初盘开出全场让球：塞维利亚-0/0.5，机构倾向主队稍占优势。西班牙甲级联赛第1轮，主队近两场主场获连胜，主场优势明显，球队攻防有序，向心力强，状态较佳。客队近四场作客1胜1平2负，客场表现欠佳，状态相对低迷。两队近七场交锋塞维利亚3胜4平保持不败战绩，整体实力相对更强，另加主场优势，综合分析本场看好主队拿下新赛季开门红。 全场让球：塞维利亚-0/[email protected] 全场大小：小2/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-0
【九游-8月16日 1点30分 西甲 阿拉维斯 vs 赫塔费】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据方面机构开出主队让0/0.5，给予实力的认可。阿拉维斯与赫塔费近10次交锋中，阿拉维斯仅取得1胜5平4负，往绩处于下风，双方比赛也较多呈现胶着局面。近期状态方面，阿拉维斯近10场4胜3平3负，整体表现尚可；赫塔费则取得5胜1平4负，状态略占优势。不过本场阿拉维斯坐镇门迪索罗萨球场，主场因素能够一定程度弥补往绩劣势。结合双方近期走势和交锋特点，本场胜负差距有限，预计比赛节奏谨慎，双方有较大机会再次陷入僵持。综合分析，本场更看好双方握手言和。 全场让球：赫塔费+0/[email protected] 全场大小：小1.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：1-1
【九游-8月15日 15点整 LPL 深圳NIP vs 苏州LNG】 #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据初盘开出全局获胜：深圳[email protected]/苏州[email protected]，机构更倾向于深圳NIP的优势。深圳NIP目前以3胜0负、+5净胜分雄踞涅槃组榜首，近期状态极其火热且保持全胜，团队在中野联动与前期节奏把控上极具侵略性，中后期团战拉扯与资源团把控同样表现稳定。苏州LNG则陷入严重低谷，目前以0胜4负、-8净胜分在涅槃组惨遭垫底，队伍前中期频繁失误掉档，中后期决策与沟通脱节严重，整体竞技状态依旧迷茫。两队此前近3次历史交锋深圳NIP均以2-0横扫苏州LNG，且NIP拥有一套更为丰富熟练的阵容储备与战术选择。综合分析本场看好深圳NIP凭借更强的团队凝聚力与火热的状态轻松拿下胜利。 首局一血：深圳[email protected] 首局击杀让分：深圳[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小：大[email protected]
❤1
【九游-8月15日 3点整 英冠 狼队 vs 布莱克本】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据方面机构开出主队让1，给予实力的认可。狼队本场是新赛季英冠揭幕战，球队从英超降级后目标明确，近期多家赛季预测也将狼队列为升级甚至争冠热门；布莱克本则被部分预测列入保级压力较大的球队。 从历史交锋来看，狼队近10次面对布莱克本取得5胜4平1负，优势较为明显。加上本场坐镇莫利纽球场，主场气势和整体实力都更值得信赖。布莱克本虽然具备一定反击能力，但赛季初阵容磨合以及客场稳定性仍需观察。综合分析，本场更看好狼队主场取胜。 全场让球：狼队[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
【九游-8月15日 1点整 丹麦超 维堡 vs 奥胡斯】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据初盘开出全场让球：维堡-0.5，机构倾向主队优势。丹麦超级联赛第4轮，主队近两轮1平1负未尝胜绩，前场把握进球能力有所下降，表现欠佳，状态回落。客队近五场2胜2平1负，传控能力有所提升，状态较佳，整体表现相对稳定。两队近五场交锋奥胡斯4胜1平占较大优势，近年实力相对更强，综合分析本场看好客队可以守住指数。 全场让球：奥胡斯[email protected] 全场大小：大2.5/[email protected] 推荐比分：2-2
【九游-8月14日 2点45分 欧联资 哈茨 vs 本菲卡】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据方面机构开出客队让1/1.5，给予实力的认可。哈茨近期状态有所起伏，近10场取得4胜6负，球队整体稳定性不足，尤其面对实力较强的对手时，防守端容易暴露问题。本场虽然坐镇主场，但想要限制本菲卡的进攻压力较大。本菲卡近10场取得5胜3平2负，整体表现更加稳定，作为葡超传统豪门，球队在阵容实力、欧战经验以及比赛节奏控制方面均占据优势。面对哈茨的防线，本菲卡具备更强的进攻创造力，有望掌握比赛主动。综合分析，本场更看好本菲卡客场取胜。 全场让球：本菲卡-1/[email protected] 全场大小：小3/[email protected] 推荐比分：0-2
【九游-8月14日 0点15分 沙特超 艾卜哈 vs 哈森姆】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） #足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据初盘开出全场让球平手盘，机构倾向两队均势。沙特超级联赛第1轮，主队近五场1平4负，攻击力较弱，表现甚差，状态低迷。客队防守较为稳固，传控能力强，状态良好，整体表现稳定。两队近四场交锋哈森姆2胜2平保持不败战绩，近年整体实力更胜一筹，近期发挥也更为出色，综合分析本场看好客队拿下新赛季首胜。 全场让球：哈森姆[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：0-1
【九游-8月13日 10点整 TI15揭幕战 BoomBoys vs OG】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！） 数据初盘开出全局获胜：[email protected]/[email protected]，机构更倾向于BoomBoys的优势。BoomBoys作为直邀强队实力毋庸置疑，队伍整体战术执行力极强，前中期打法犀利且擅长通过频繁的野区寻敌掌控地图主动权。OG这支起源于欧洲的老牌劲旅，将Dota 2分部转型至东南亚赛区完成阵容重组。并一路杀出重围，韧性十足。队伍极具创造力的BP风格与中后期拉扯团战一直是其立足之本。两队风格各有侧重，BoomBoys在前期线权压制和转线节奏上更具爆发力，而OG的适应能力与劣势局把控上不容小觑。作为TI15小组赛首轮瑞士轮的强强较量，综合分析本场看好状态更为稳定的BoomBoys凭前中期节奏压制抢下开门红。 首局一血：[email protected] 首局击杀让分：[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小…
【九游-8月13日 15点整 LPL WBG TapTap vs 深圳NIP】 #电竞 #LPL 数据初盘开出全局获胜：WBG [email protected]/深圳[email protected]，机构更倾向于两队势均力敌。深圳NIP目前以3胜0负、+5净胜分高居涅槃组榜首，近期豪取三连胜且未尝败绩，团队中野联动紧密，前中期节奏掌控力极强且中后期团战拉扯十分稳健。WBG TapTap则在涅槃组状态有所起伏，暂以1胜2负、-1净胜分排在第3位，队伍在优势局的决策掌控与龙坑团战站位上频繁出现脱节。两队此前在涅槃组的直接交锋中，NIP曾以2-0横扫WBG，展现出极强的风格克制与对位压制力，且拥有充沛的英雄池与战术储备。综合分析本场看好深圳NIP凭借更加出色的竞技状态与稳定的战术执行力拿下胜利。 首局一血：深圳[email protected] 首局击杀让分：深圳[email protected] 首局比赛时间大小：大[email protected]
【九游-8月13日 3点整 欧超杯 巴黎圣日耳曼 vs 阿斯顿维拉】 （本场赛事红包雨🧧敬请周知！）#足球比赛 #体育 #赛事推荐 数据方面机构开出主队让0.5/1，给予实力的认可。巴黎圣日耳曼与阿斯顿维拉历史交锋战绩为1胜1负，双方整体差距并不明显，但巴黎圣日耳曼曾在主场3-1击败阿斯顿维拉，展现出较强的比赛掌控能力。本场欧洲超级杯决赛在中立场地进行，巴黎虽然失去主场优势，但凭借更深厚的阵容实力、欧战经验以及进攻端的创造力，依然具备较强竞争力。阿斯顿维拉近年来成长明显，防守体系和反击能力值得重视，不过面对巴黎高强度的进攻压迫，后防线将承受较大考验。综合分析，本场更看好巴黎圣日耳曼取胜。 全场让球：巴黎圣日耳曼-0.5/[email protected] 全场大小：小[email protected] 推荐比分：2-0
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiuyou449. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“足球推荐 体育赛事 赛事推荐 五大联赛 九游体育” (@jiuyou449), 10,535 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiuyou449.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.