Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 廣傳九評

Channel

廣傳九評

@jiuping254jiuren

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

10subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002804510061
TypeChannel
Username@jiuping254jiuren
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 October 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 10 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiuping254jiuren

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7108.57 August 2026 — 7 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9 subscribers1 October 2026 — 10 subscribers7 August 20261 October 2026
4 measurements spanning 55 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7–10 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
1 Oct 2026, 09:1710+1
21 Aug 2026, 18:279+2
12 Aug 2026, 18:167no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:147first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5h 21m
Average length
16m 56s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 November 2025 to 4 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 Feb 2026, 12:13 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

军队抵制内幕! 习政治局会议受阻【每日直播精华】远见快评|2026.02.03 @靖远开讲

4 Feb 2026, 12:10 UTC12 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

人大加塞儿开会,习近平再挥快刀;军长透等待时机,习近平被加冕;精神病院多如面馆,患者多为正常人;免费住院的猫腻,病人成了摇钱树;强制住院八九年,病人绝望自杀【新闻看点 李沐阳2.3】

20 Jan 2026, 04:29 UTC32 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

中國六大怪象,中共國進入滅亡模式;又一起報復社會?百姓改裝武器 【新聞看點 李沐陽1.19】 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qh6VWYrtSrg

17 Jan 2026, 13:03 UTC354 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

官二代反了:实名揭伊朗高层惊人惨状;习近平器官完了:河南人打响“零件保卫战”,150岁工程泡汤? 汪文斌卖猪仔? (老北京茶馆/第1533集/2026/01/16)

14 Jan 2026, 02:53 UTC19 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

伊朗超2万丧生? 美重兵集结中东,川普有三种打击方案;网友的神预测,习近平到坎儿【新闻看点 李沐阳1.13】

1 Jan 2026, 12:04 UTC18 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

郭德纲嘲讽列宁的一段相声, 唱功不浅!👍🤣

14 Dec 2025, 00:23 UTC15 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

于曾被天娱骂“赔钱货”? 拒绝两个“女大佬”! 爆料:坏人们山东有“大伞”,赵露思不易;美刑侦专家指“于朦胧”应按谋S调查,有可疑! 基于真实案例的经验之谈;传中共大将“常丁求”审讯中离世|大宇拍案惊奇

7 Dec 2025, 11:22 UTC17 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

No.1【共產主義的終極目的】之一:序言

7 Dec 2025, 03:22 UTC339 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

🔥【 #曉坤話時局 】中共高層瘋狂失蹤!蔡奇、韓正、李希接連「隱身」意味著什麼?中南海詭異沉默:多名正國級官員人間蒸發!政變前奏?還是…… 💛 觀看完整視頻: 🔥完整影片👉🏻 https://newswecantrust.com/jsxc3h

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiuping254jiuren. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 1 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“廣傳九評” (@jiuping254jiuren), 10 subscribers as measured 1 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiuping254jiuren.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.