静静BB pinned a photo

Channel
静静BB
@jingjingjing11111
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
793subscribers
+69 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003307156929 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jingjingjing11111 |
| Created | Between 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jingjingjing11111 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 89% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:16 | 793 | +15 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 778 | +13 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 765 | +9 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 756 | +17 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:17 | 739 | +12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:36 | 727 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:05 | 724 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 724 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 8 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 13s
- Average length
- 7s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
75 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 29 | 38.7% | |
| 👍 | 22 | 29.3% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 12.0% | |
| 👌 | 7 | 9.33% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.33% | |
| 💋 | 2 | 2.67% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.33% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.33% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 75 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 8 May 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
京鹏 11111 预约联系 @guobinjingjing 或微信二维码
❤3👌1
谣言止于智者
👍3❤1
清理上世纪库存
❤5👍2
骗子的号是这个,大家注意区分谨防上当受骗,骗子乱说的话乱给的植树与本人无关。
冒充我的骗子又出现了,我挖你祖坟了是吧,要假冒我给我找麻烦。谨防上当受骗,本人植树667,被人忽悠被骗与我无关。并没有习惯发信息主动私聊你们。本人仅此一个TG号,暂时不在TG上预约时间,都需要加我本人微信为准。
❤2👌2🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤12❤🔥4👍3🥰3💯1
Video, posted without a caption
❤5👍2
星期六可以上班咯,现在可以提前预约
👍5
网上有些人挺恶心的,乱说乱造谣,还好我现在强的可怕,风言风语影响不到我了,造谣的直接死全家。再说一遍植树以问我本人为准,不要道听途说听别人瞎几把说🥲
👍7👌1
Video, posted without a caption
🥰6💋2❤1
假冒版靜靜 帳號無設id 暫用此icon 如有查詢 可pm靜靜 @guobinjingjing 請認清真偽 如有約鐘/訂金上的任何損失 與靜靜無關
👌3
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @jingjingjing11111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“静静BB” (@jingjingjing11111), 793 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jingjingjing11111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.