Channel
@jingbaobei333520
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
760subscribers
+23 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002957404354 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jingbaobei333520 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jingbaobei333520 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:13 | 760 | +21 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 739 | +2 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:18 | 737 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 24 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (24 May 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,643 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
上课时间:8.9 验证留名:哪 所在位置：东莞厚街 老师名称：#静静 老师电报： @jingjing333520 上课价格：500/P 妹子年龄：28 总体评分（满分10分）: 容貌评分: 8.5 身材评分： 10 服务评分： 10 环境评分： 9 自由评论：进门看到老师，乖巧轻熟气质型女友。房间很温馨，一身包裹群把两只大奶显得特别有诱惑，很大，马上上手抓了两把，真货，转身都能看到老师的内裤呢，一看就很骚的那种，给我冲澡，🐍一会，下跪给我口活，我两只手一直也没有闲着奶子又大又软又丝滑，皮肤也很白，躺在床上，老师用两只大奶给我轻揉身体，真的舒服⋯.由于我怕痒，没要求老师弄太久，于是老师给我🐍AB面，刺激感甜蜜感满满，天灵盖都能感受到的爽！口的也是很爽，舌头灵活打转，龟头比较敏感了差点出水，触感很好，🐍功真是了得。做起也是呻吟不停，面部表情诱人，越看越好看，射进去打了个颤栗，全程配合不催人，太值了
在线可约
在线
在线开课吖
开课了
下雨了！出门记得带伞哦宝宝们
休息中
上课时间:26..6.3 验证留名:S 所在位置：厚街 老师名称：#静静 老师电报：@jingjing333520 上课价格：500/P 妹子年龄：御姐风 总体评分（满分10分）: 容貌评分: 9 身材评分： 9 服务评分：10 环境评分：10 自由评论： 这是我第二次约老师了，今天刚好老师空，我就约了，到了老师家，简单聊了一会，然后付水费，就洗澡，老师帮我一起洗，看到老师的胸那是粉粉的我是真的喜欢，就忍不住去摸，洗了一会就亲老师。全程老师帮我洗，洗漱好了之后去房间，老师让我躺着，就开始亲我，慢慢的往下亲，后舔着我咪咪，那是爽不都要不要的，后面舔鸡巴，看着老师穴，我都忍不住的想去舔了，想想还是忍住了，后面受不了了，带套，开干、老师的穴很紧 ，水又多，还会夹 舒服惨了 老师一直宝宝宝宝的叫我，由于我是标准的123选手，操了一会就出货了，出完货就去洗澡了，老师服务周到，温柔活儿好😊还会反食
❤2
在线开课♥️
❤1
开课中
在线在线🥰
在线😘
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jingbaobei333520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 498,581 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“厚街💋静静🐍吻毒🐉69” (@jingbaobei333520), 760 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jingbaobei333520.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.