全国航班记录 一年 保真不保漏 亲测有遗漏 所以降价 再来的 😤😤😤😤

Channel
记恨通知频道
@jihentyc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
16,031subscribers
-270 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003934795998 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jihentyc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 15 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jihentyc |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 18:35 | 16,031 | -146 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:47 | 16,177 | -124 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 16,301 | first reading |
Engagement
25 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.20%
- avg views ÷ 16,031 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 192
- 25 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.721%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 25
- of 25 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 25 (10 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,800 |
| Reactions total | 20 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 17 Aug 2026, 19:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 26
- Videos
- 2
- Links
- 1
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 11s
- Average length
- 2m 11s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
20 reactions across 13 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 10 | 50.0% | |
| 🤣 | 4 | 20.0% | |
| 🖕 | 3 | 15.0% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 5.00% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 5.00% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 20reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
公网名下支付宝 😤😤😤 人在秒,无遗漏,一秒一个,批量谈价格,提供名字身份证 公司 名下邮箱也能出
名下所有卡号带余额😤😤😤😤(3-10天) 名下所有卡号不带余额😤😤😤😤(5天) 余额有失败的(反馈不出来)介意勿报 直接是正常卡号,可出流水 2000012247374_00RMB带字母的这种卡号不会有!! 不限制北京上海人,所有人都能出 敏感人物 扣单! 敏感包括 :和开同对标,法人不敏感 回单时间:带余额的报单日开始3-10天回单!(周二周四周六回单高峰期,错过了就是下次周二周四周六) 遗漏情况:可能有一丢丢漏 报单 提供身份证号
飞火监控开 😤😤😤😤 当天或者往后几天只要购买飞机火车高铁记录都可以监控到 提供身份证报单挂系统 出票了通知你算成交 默认挂15天 被监控人购票后已选座位都可以看到 抓人一抓一个准 一手资源 批量价优 好东西不常有 强推
紧急❗️❗️❗️通知 外面的重庆房产已死 我这正常 需带头报单
全国航班记录 😤😤😤😤 未起飞的记录也有 一年记录 极少遗漏 同行人+😤😤😤 文字回,工作日当天隔天回
穷举有效期复活 新口子,自家口子 带头报单,出必准 😤😤
❤1
紧急‼️通知 黑龙江地区房产 不需要有效期了 不需要有效期 不需要有效期 带头报单
❤1
监控停车场.覆盖百分之95停车场 😤😤😤😤 进场即为本单结束 最高可监控10天 没车图 不出售技术
❤1
监控停车场.只能出大停车场 😤😤😤😤 进场即为本单结束 最高可监控10天 小城市不要来(没什么停车场) 也出售技术(技术一学即会)1000U
❤1
老渠道房产回归 全国房产 首套 😤😤😤😤 后续每套按照😤😤😤 老线房产,三天左右回单,不接排除,不接指定房产【可以指定套数】,可以备注优先出的地方,但是备注地方没有就默认出全国! 第一套就叫首套,后面想要的每一套都是算后续套数价格!! 同行代理来拿价格.一手拿货,源头直出
❤1
三网宽带地址 😤😤😤 不限制移动电信联通名下有什么宽带统统出 找人的好项目 有哪个给哪个,适合找老赖,名下没手机号的,总要租房办宽带吧,直接上门去抓他,比定位好用,用别人的手机号办宽带也一样出 报单提供 名字 身份证号码 每天下午开秒
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @jihentyc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@jihentyc edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
- First edit seen
- 15 August 2026
- Most recent edit
- 16 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,478,989 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“记恨通知频道” (@jihentyc), 16,031 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jihentyc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.