Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐Ÿฉธใญใˆใ€ใƒŠใƒŠยฐ๏ฝกโ‹†โธœ๐Ÿฆด# แ–ญเฝฒเผแ–ซเพ€

Channel

๐Ÿฉธใญใˆใ€ใƒŠใƒŠยฐ๏ฝกโ‹†โธœ๐Ÿฆด# แ–ญเฝฒเผแ–ซเพ€

@jieunnnnnnnnt

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Polls ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

19subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 November 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002337054758
TypeChannel
Username@jieunnnnnnnnt
Descriptionหšโœงโ‚ŠโŽโ™กโŽโบหณโœงเผšแก•แ ตแ Šแกƒเกšเ ขเ ˜เปˆ โธเปˆเ กเ ฃแ Š฿ฏแ †เ ฃเ ˜แกเ ฃเ ˜แ Šแ Šเ ขเ ˜๐ก ๐ŸŽถ๐ŸŽธ ะฟะตั€ะตั…ะพะดะฝะธะบ ะฒ ั‚ะณะบ
First recorded8 November 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jieunnnnnnnnt

Growth

198 Nov 2026, 02:47 โ€” 19 subscribers8 Nov 2026, 03:22 โ€” 19 subscribers8 Nov 2026, 02:478 Nov 2026, 03:22
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 18โ€“20 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 03:2219no change
8 Nov 2026, 02:4719first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 24 January 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
340.4%
avg views รท 19 subscribers
Avg views / post
64.7
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.63%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท views โ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 3 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held11 (24 January 2025 โ€“ 3 November 2026)
Views total194
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 03:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
6
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

9 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ“555.6%
๐Ÿ‘พ222.2%
๐ŸŽƒ111.1%
๐Ÿ‘ป111.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 9 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegramโ€™s own โ€˜editedโ€™ marker: 2 of 3 posts held from the last 30 days (66.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before โ€” this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 12:27 UTC22 viewsread 8 November 2026

https://t.me/+wvyOT-PowbM1ZWMy my tgk channel ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ะฟะพะดะฟะธัˆะธั‚ะตััŒ ะฟะพะถะฐะปัƒะนัั‚ะฐ

3 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC20 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆใ€ใ‚ใชใŸใฏ็พๅฎŸใงใฏใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€ใ‚ใชใŸใฎๅ‘จใ‚Šใฎไธ–็•Œใฏ็พๅฎŸใงใฏใ‚ใ‚Šใพใ›ใ‚“ใ€‚่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉโค๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆใ€่ตทใใฆ

30 Oct 2026, 21:07 UTC152 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026

๐Ÿคฉ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“น๐“น๐”‚ ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ต๐“ต๐“ธ๐”€๐“ฎ๐“ฎ๐“ท ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŒŸ๐Ÿคฉโค๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ

๐Ÿ“2๐ŸŽƒ1๐Ÿ‘ป1

28 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC471 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ” ๐Ÿ” ๐ŸŒŸ ๐“ผ๐“ฑ๐“ฎ/๐“ฑ๐“ฎ๐“ป only!!! ๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐Ÿ˜€๐“ซ๐“ญ:05.02 ๐“ผ๐”4๏ธโƒฃ ๐“ผ๐”8๏ธโƒฃ ๐“ผ๐”6๏ธโƒฃ EFVL 4๏ธโƒฃ๐“ฆ3๏ธโƒฃ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸโ—๏ธ๐“œ๐“๐“˜๐“โ—๏ธ ๐“ฏ๐“ญ: ๐”‚๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ต๐“ธ๐”€ ๐“ณ๐“ช๐“ฌ๐“ด๐“ฎ๐“ฝ๐“ผ, ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฏ๐“ฎ ๐“ฒ๐“ผ ๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ป๐“ช๐“ท๐“ฐ๐“ฎ, ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“ท๐“ท๐“ฒ๐“ซ๐“ช๐“ต ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐“ถ๐”‚ ๐“ฝ๐“ฐ๐“ด ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸโ—๏ธ๐“œ๐“๐“˜๐“โ—๏ธ๐“ด๐“ฒ๐“ท๐“ท๐“ผ : ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐“ท๐“ช๐“ท๐“ช ๐“ธ๐“ผ๐“ช๐“ด๐“ฒ, ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐“ณ๐“ฒ๐“ท๐”,๐“ท๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ช๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฎ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐“ผ๐“ฌ๐“ช๐“ฝ๐“ธ๐“ป๐“ฌ๐“ฌ๐“ฒ๐“ธ, ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐“ผ๐“ฑ๐“ช๐“พ๐“ท๐“ช ๐“ผ๐“ฑ๐“ฒ๐“น๐“ถ๐“ช๐“ท ๐“ป๐“ฎ-๐“ต ๐“ถ๐“ช๐”‚๐“ฎ๐“ป,๐“ฌ๐“ฑ๐“ต๐“ธ๐“ฎ ๐“น๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ฌ๐“ฎ, ๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ฎ ๐”€๐“ฒ๐“ต๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ช๐“ถ๐“ผ,๐“ถ๐“ช๐“ป๐“ฌ๐“ฎ๐“ต๐“ฒ๐“ท๐“ฎ, ๐“น๐“ฎ๐“ช๐“ป๐“ต, ๐“ถ๐“ธ๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ณ๐“ธ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐“ถ๐”‚ ๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ฎ ๐“ช๐“ท๐“ญ ๐“ธ๐“ท๐“ต๐”‚ ๐“ต๐“ธ๐“ฟ๐“ฎ @furawasaku

๐Ÿ“3

14 Feb 2026, 04:11 UTC850 viewsread 8 November 2026
Poll

๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป

  1. ๐Ÿ–ค36%
  2. ๐Ÿ–ค18%
  3. ๐Ÿ–ค26%
  4. ๐Ÿ–ค19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

14 Feb 2026, 04:10 UTC814 views1 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿคญ ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿคญ๐Ÿ–ค ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿคญ ๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ–ค๐Ÿ˜“ ๐Ÿˆ1๐“ผ๐“ฝ๐“ป๐“ช๐“ท๐“ฐ๐“ฎ๐“ป ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ ๐Ÿ“ผ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ๐ŸŒŸ ๐Ÿคฉ2๐“ฏ๐“ป๐“ฒ๐“ฎ๐“ท๐“ญ ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ3๐“ฏ๐“ช๐“ท!! ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿ“ผ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿค”4๐“ฎ๐“ท๐“ฎ๐“ถ๐”‚๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ๐Ÿคฉ ๐Ÿคฉ๐ŸŽโญโญโญ โญโญโญโญโญ

๐Ÿ‘พ1

4 Feb 2026, 01:55 UTC787 viewsread 8 November 2026

1โƒฃ2๏ธโƒฃ3๏ธโƒฃ4๏ธโƒฃ5๏ธโƒฃ6๏ธโƒฃ7๏ธโƒฃ8๏ธโƒฃ 9๏ธโƒฃ๐Ÿ”Ÿ1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ1๏ธโƒฃ

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @jieunnnnnnnnt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโ€™s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Feb 2026, 04:11 UTCAnonymous Poll72 voters

๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป๐Ÿ‘ป

  1. ๐Ÿ–ค36%
  2. ๐Ÿ–ค18%
  3. ๐Ÿ–ค26%
  4. ๐Ÿ–ค19%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only โ€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionโ€™s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโ€™s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 24 January 2025 to 3 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐Ÿฉธใญใˆใ€ใƒŠใƒŠยฐ๏ฝกโ‹†โธœ๐Ÿฆด# แ–ญเฝฒเผแ–ซเพ€โ€ (@jieunnnnnnnnt), 19 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jieunnnnnnnnt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.