Channel
@jidufuhuole
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
188subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001946256733 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jidufuhuole |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jidufuhuole |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 188 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 189 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:16 | 189 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (30 July 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 398 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
若有人说：「敬爱上帝的人怎能有喜乐，既然许多苦难如先知所言『义人虽多受苦难（诗篇 33:20）』却将他们团团围住」——这话不错。虔诚的灵魂确实承受许多患难与痛苦，但这些苦难只是从外部击打他们，而未触及他们敬爱上帝的灵魂。相反，自爱者则被外在和内在的苦恼困扰并淹没。因此，自爱者的苦难远比敬爱上帝者更多。虽然苦难与灾祸包围着敬爱上帝者，却淹不没他们；刺得他们像玫瑰遇荆棘，却不能刺穿；遮蔽他们像雾遮日，却不能使之昏暗；拍打他们像海浪拍石，却不能摧毁：因为天上的宝藏和神的国度『就在你们心里』（路加福音 17:21），它如同锚固颠簸的船只，保守他们的灵魂，并使他们在凡事上充满盼望。 —— 圣提洪·扎东斯基 #引文
#表情
Video, posted without a caption
#表情
他们第一次尝试后，就以为神职实践超出了他们可怜的理解能力，便放弃了。他们要的是蜜糖！而基督的世界，正如成年男子一样，靠蜜糖是活不下去的。主上帝在圣经里说过，我们是地上的盐，孩子 мой，而不是蜜。请看，我们可怜的世界就像身受重创、遍体鳞伤的约伯，坐在自己的粪堆上。盐撒在发炎的皮肤上会刺痛，但它能防腐。我们脑子里只有一件事——踩住魔鬼，还要博得爱——我指的是对自己的爱。真正的神父永远得不到人们的爱，请记住这一点。还有，我可以再告诉你一件事吗？教会才不在乎你们被爱与否，我的好朋友。让他们尊敬你们，顺从你们吧。教会需要秩序。保证整天都不破坏这种秩序。建立秩序吧，但要记住，明天又会再次混乱，因为这是自然规律——黑夜会抹掉前一天你们取得的一切——黑夜属于魔鬼。 喬治·貝爾納諾斯《一个乡村教师的日记》 #引文 #书
东正教朝圣者以极大的敬意将圣殿山视为救主尘世生活的地方。然而，他们承认伊斯兰瓦克夫对该地区的主权。与一些期待重建第三圣殿以实现末世预言的新教派别（如千禧年前论派）不同，东正教中没有关于必须重建实体建筑的教义。东正教所等待的是神的国度和基督的再来，而不是在奠基石上恢复动物血祭。
从东正教基督徒的角度来看，位于圣殿山顶端的这块岩石（即“奠基石”或“世界之石”）本身并不是独立的敬拜对象。与犹太教不同，在东正教传统中没有关于这块石头作为宇宙根基的神圣性教义。 然而，由于这块岩石是耶路撒冷圣殿的所在地——而旧约宗教的中心与耶稣基督的尘世生活密不可分——它在基督教历史和神学中具有重要意义。 1. 福音事件发生的场所 就在建于这块奠基石之上的圣殿里： 婴儿耶稣在出生后第四十天被带到这里，根据摩西律法接受献祭，被义人西面接待（庆祝主显节/耶稣献堂日）。 十二岁的少年耶稣在逾越节后留在圣殿里，向长者们讲道，以其智慧让他们惊叹。 基督自己在圣殿区域内进行布道、赶出商贩（“我的殿必称为祷告的殿；你们倒使他成了贼窝”）并斥责文士和法利赛人。 当门徒指着圣殿的宝物库对他说话时，他就是指向这里，提到了那个捐献两个小钱的穷寡妇。 2. 预言性的毁灭 对于基督徒而言，第二圣殿的存在是暂时的。根据《马太福音》第24章，当门徒向耶稣指点…
马利亚·抹大拉并不是妓女。没错，她也不是基督的妻子。 一千五百年来，人们把她没有做过的事归咎于这位女性。这是两个被世纪分割开来的虚构故事。一个源自中世纪的错误，另一个则源自现代小说。而关于马利亚·抹大拉的真相，比任何轰动效应都要有力得多。 人们称马利亚·抹大拉为妓女，但在福音书中没有任何文字记载她生活在放荡淫乱之中。那里只写了一件事：基督从她体内赶出了七个污鬼。 七个污鬼是什么？有愤怒之鬼、忧郁之鬼、贪财之鬼和怨恨之鬼。其中甚至连淫欲都不是最主要的。我们只是不知道她患了什么病，而凭空揣测福音书内容——这不是我们该做的事。 现在说说：懊悔的妓女这个形象是怎么来的？在中世纪，人们将马利亚·抹大拉的历史与另一位圣徒——埃及的马利亚的生平混为一谈。正是她，在悔改之前确实是妓女，随后便离群索居于旷野，成为了伟大的圣徒。 但那是另一位马利亚。这一错误进入了书籍，继而又进入了绘画和雕塑。就这样，哭泣的懊悔妓女抹大拉出现了。但这是附着…
👍2
这种对基督教属性的自由解释是亵渎吗
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
在我所在的社区里，我碰见一个穿着亵渎神明T恤的少女：上面画的是耶稣抱着动漫人物。 我告诉她这不对，提议陪她去附近的商店买一件正常的T恤，让她把这件给我。 这个女孩执意不肯。我警告她，在我们国家穿这种图案是违法的，会构成犯罪。我说我已经给她拍了照片，要发给辖区内各学校的校长们，他们能认出她，把她的父母叫来，然后就会出事。 之后她同意了，我们一起去了商店，我给她买了一件年轻人的T恤，那件亵渎神明的衣服她交给我销毁了。 via @uranopolitan #新闻 #幽默
斋戒（пост）确实有助于克服暴食（чревоугодие），并且可能对外貌产生积极影响。然而，这些效应更多是斋戒的必然结果，而非其主要目的。 战胜暴食 从精神层面来看，这是任何斋戒的首要任务。在东正教传统中，斋戒首先是一种禁欲锻炼（аскеза）。 打破依赖： 大瓦西里主教称暴食为“情欲之母”，因为身体的饱腾会导致淫乱、忧郁和懒惰。通过节制特定食物（尤其是动物性来源）及其数量，人训练自己的意志。他学会对食物说“不”，从而使肉体臣服于灵魂。 净化心智： 金口若望主教教导：“暴食使心灵迟钝，使灵魂变得肉欲横流，它使人失去洞察力”。当胃部不被沉重的食物消化过程所压垂时，思绪变得清晰，这对于专注祈祷和悔罪至关重要。 灵修实践： 斋戒与祈祷密不可分。正如《福音书》中关于被污鬼附的男孩所记载的，只有“以祈祷和禁食”才能驱逐某些邪灵（马太福音 17:21）。 对外貌的影响 在遵守斋戒时，外貌的积极变化在《圣经》和圣徒传记中屡见不鲜： 圣经实…
关于普世真理与价值的结论 普世价值。 它们并非宗教教条本身，而是由此产生的行为规范：对受苦者的怜悯、诚实、守信、关怀儿童和老年人、追求和平。这些价值是真实的，因为它们经历了不同文明千百年的实践检验：建立在相反原则（背叛、残忍、破坏家庭）之上的社会必然衰退和消失。它们符合人类在安全、归属感和意义感方面的深层需求。 系统的“真理性”。 这些体系本身对“为什么要善良？”这一问题提供了不同的答案。 基督教回答：“为了恢复与个人上帝的联系，并拯救灵魂以获得永生”。 佛教回答：“为了停止自身的痛苦，并停止所有众生的痛苦循环”。 客观上无法证明一种形而上图景优于另一种，因为它们超出了科学方法的范围。在它们之间的选择是一个个人灵性体验、文化传统以及人更亲近的意义语言的问题。可以说，这些价值在其伦理维度上普遍“真实”（作为成功共同生活的规则），但其最高意义仍然是信仰的主题。 #资料
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jidufuhuole. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
这种对基督教属性的自由解释是亵渎吗
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“正统是救赎之道☦️” (@jidufuhuole), 188 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jidufuhuole.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.