Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 嘉兴一日女友群

Supergroup

嘉兴一日女友群

@jiangzhehu1rinvyou

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Cite this entry

12,733members

+9,434 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

1,092 online right now

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004371997067
TypeSupergroup
Username@jiangzhehu1rinvyou
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 31 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jiangzhehu1rinvyou

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 80% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,29912,9838,14114 August 2026 — 3,299 members15 August 2026 — 3,304 members18 August 2026 — 3,423 members22 August 2026 — 3,438 members25 August 2026 — 3,450 members28 August 2026 — 3,452 members31 August 2026 — 3,458 members3 September 2026 — 3,457 members8 September 2026 — 3,457 members8 September 2026 — 3,471 members12 September 2026 — 12,847 members14 September 2026 — 12,983 members16 September 2026 — 12,816 members18 September 2026 — 12,733 members12,73314 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 35 days, net +9,434. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,846–14,436 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every members count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)MembersChange
18 Sept 2026, 09:1512,733-83
16 Sept 2026, 00:5812,816-167
14 Sept 2026, 10:5812,983+136
12 Sept 2026, 17:4112,847+9,376
8 Sept 2026, 16:003,471+14
8 Sept 2026, 13:523,457no change
3 Sept 2026, 10:433,457-1
31 Aug 2026, 01:383,458+6
28 Aug 2026, 06:523,452+2
25 Aug 2026, 03:153,450+12
22 Aug 2026, 01:363,438+15
18 Aug 2026, 13:063,423+119
15 Aug 2026, 05:563,304+5
14 Aug 2026, 19:453,299first reading

Engagement

Posts not read yet. This entry is on the register from its profile alone; the post reader has not reached it. Engagement figures appear here once posts have actually been measured — we do not publish a rate before we have the readings behind it.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“嘉兴一日女友群” (@jiangzhehu1rinvyou), 12,733 members as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiangzhehu1rinvyou.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.