Channel
@jiangchengjun258
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
13subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001744620570 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jiangchengjun258 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 21 October 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jiangchengjun258 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 2 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 18:55 | 13 | -1 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 14 | -1 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 15 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 12:34 | 16 | +2 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 14 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:40 | 14 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 21 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 8 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 83.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 49 | 83.1% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| ❤ | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.39% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.69% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 October 2022 to 2 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 10 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
今天是11月27日，星期日，农历十一月初四。在前进的路上，别急着一口气狂奔到底。静得下心，才能守住目标，沉得住气，才能持续发力。以笃志力行的心态，做久久的努力，踏踏实实，一步一步，终将变得很了不起！FSC链@所有人早安！
Signed 联🈴 承峻—杭州
所有的成功收获一路见证： 哪有什么一战成名？ 哪有什么千锤百炼？ 无非就是在清晰中不迷茫，浑然中出现！
Signed 联🈴 承峻—杭州
此人除了发视频号，还现场直播数字资产✔
Signed 联🈴 承峻—杭州
[握手]🈴[握手]🈴[握手]🈴[握手]🈴 🈴[握手]联合群英会🈴[握手] [握手]🈴[握手]🈴[握手]🈴[握手]🈴 🉐联🈴课件🈵载🈶归{㊙} 社区正善美，英杰展荟萃！ 联合你我他，凝聚共繁华！ 【金牌主持】修 修 【社区规划】葡 萄 【联合共赢】南 华 20:05分 主会场：联🈴社区电报群 https://ss.transgot.cn/QULHSC #腾讯会议：427-7224-1815 主题：🔻👁 ✊🏻放链规划，价值诠释。 ❤️社区争霸，阳光心态。 🔥联合你我，共赢未来。 共谋事..共未来..联🈴社区欢迎您
Signed 联🈴 承峻—杭州
未来的百分百是未知的，有的时候可能的确令人不理想，甚至是失望，但自己的未来是由自己的双手构建的，你就不必害怕。心中有谱，脑中有路。 梦想这东西和经典一样，永远不会因为时间而褪色，像酱香酒一样，越久越香，反而更显珍贵。 @所有人，FSC链朋友早安！
Signed 联紫 承峻—杭州
生活不只是一场赛跑，而是一场旅行，要懂得好好欣赏每一段的风景。FSC链家人不要只因目前局面，就放下你原来决心想到达的目的。FSC链朋友现在好！
Signed 联紫 承峻—杭州
新的一天让我们扬起奋斗的风帆，吹响奋斗的号角，奏响奋斗的乐章！ 向前吧！去改写自己的命运，去创造自己的奇迹吧！因为，人生需要不停地奋斗。 不论经历多少的风风雨雨，都要坚持奋斗下去。FSC链朋友现在好！
Signed 联紫 承峻—杭州
尺有所短，寸有所长，永远抱一颗谦卑的心，才能让自己更加完善。人生没有完美，只有完善；岁月没有十全十美，只有尽善尽美。 口头无意， 必须实际！ 各位 FSC链大咖 现在好！
👍17😁1
Signed 联紫— 子墨—杭州
早安！
Signed 联紫— 子墨—杭州
每一个清晨，都是一个美好的开始；每一个清晨，都意味着前进的脚步。 不管昨天怎么样，今天我们只做最好的自己，带着微笑，带着善良，带着梦想起航，凑响FSC链繁华大道的新篇章！康庄大道上，你我共辉煌！ 各位FSC共识体、建设者朋友早安！
👍7😁4❤2🔥1
Signed 联紫— 子墨—杭州
@所有人： 祝所有FSC信仰者、建设者们两周岁生日快乐，幸福安康！
👍4
Signed 联紫— 子墨—杭州
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jiangchengjun258. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“联🈴社区关联信息频道” (@jiangchengjun258), 13 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jiangchengjun258.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.