Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for إستزد من العلم قبل أن يرفع

Channel

إستزد من العلم قبل أن يرفع

@jhgffhbn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003405037484
TypeChannel
Username@jhgffhbn
Descriptionقَلِيلٌ مِنَ النَّاسِ مُؤْمِنُونَ؛ وَ قَلِيلٌ مِنَ الْمُؤْمِنِينَ مُتَعَلِّمُونَ؛ وَ قَلِيلٌ مِنَ الْمُتَعَلِّمِينَ عَامِلُونَ؛ وَ قَلِيلٌ مِنَ الْعَامِلِينَ مُخْلِصُونَ؛
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/jhgffhbn

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:4613no change
7 Aug 2026, 19:3613first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
230.4%
avg views ÷ 13 subscribers
Avg views / post
29.9
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
9.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held20 (22 July 202611 August 2026)
Views total599
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
76
Videos
29
Links
44

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 04s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

45 reactions across 16 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 68.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🕊3168.9%
💔1431.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 20:37 UTC6 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Нишонаҳои ихлос.. 1. Ҳамеша худро ба кӯтоҳӣ дар ҳаққи Аллоҳ муттаҳам бикунӣ. 2. Ҳаргиз ихлосро дар вуҷудат набинӣ ва худатро ба хотири он бозхост намоӣ. 3. Дар пайи мадҳу ситоиш ё маломат ва сарзаниши мардум набошӣ, то он ҷо ки ин ду амр наздат яксон бошад. 4. Агар мардум ба сӯйи тоат ё фасод тағйир карданд,ту тағйир накунӣ. 5. Ният меҳвари зиндагиат бошад. 6. Корҳои некатро махфӣ бикун, магар ҳангоме, ки улгу

🕊2

5 Aug 2026, 11:09 UTC24 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @matniaqidaitahaviPhoto

Матни Ақидаи Таҳовӣ Муаллиф: Абу Ҷаъфар Аҳмад ибни Муҳаммад ибни Саломаҳ Аттаҳовӣ (238-321 ҳ) بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم الحمد لله الواحد الأحد الفرد الصمد الذي تنزّه عن صفات المخلوقات من روح و جسد ووالد ،وولد، والحمد لله الذي عصم مذهب أهل السنة والجماعة عن الزيغ والضلال والانحراف في المعتقد، وأشهد أن لا إله إلا الله الكريم

1 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC28 viewsread 12 August 2026

Аз ҳазрати Абдулоҳ Бин Масъуд (разияллоҳ анҳу) ривоят шудааст, ки Расули Акрам (саллаллоҳу алайҳи ва саллам) Эшонро ғамгин дид, фармуд: худро зиёд ғамгин макун, ончи муқаддар аст, мешавад ва рӯзие, ки насибат бошад ба сӯйи ту меояд.

1 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC27 viewsread 12 August 2026

1Инсони солим бикӯшад, ки рӯзиашро худаш ба даст оварад ва низ ҳамин аст дастӯри Исломи азизамон. (2) Беҳтарин таъоме, ки Инсон мехурад ҳамон таъоме аст, ки аз дастранҷ худаш бошад. (3) Поктарин касп ҳамон аст, ки Инсон ба дасти хеш касп намояд. (4) Беҳтарин садақа ҳамон аст, ки Инсон ба амали хеш ба даст оварад, сипас аз он садақа намояд. (5) Ғолибан бештари ризқи покиза аз кишоварзи ба даст меояд. (6) Агар Тоҷ

1 Aug 2026, 00:50 UTC27 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @darul_ikhva

💡Отчаяние — грех! "...Аллах Субhанаhу ва Та‘аля отрезал голову отчаянию, сказав: "О те, которые уверовали, не отчаивайтесь в милости Аллаха...". Никто не имеет право думать, что его грехи такие большие, что даже Аллах не сможет простить их. О нет! Поистине наш Господь прощает каждому, кто сожалел и покаялся и вернулся, Он любит кающихся...." ✒️Мавляна Факих аль-Ханафи 🕯https://t.me/darul_ikhva

💔3

31 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC29 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Саьди Шерозӣ гуфт: «Шабе бо падарам бедор будем, дар ҳоле ки атрофи мо мардум дар хоб буданд. Гуфтам: “Чаро ҳеҷ яке аз инҳо барнахоста, ду ракъат намоз намехонад?” Падарам гуфт: “Эй писарам, агар мехобидӣ, бароят беҳтар буд аз он ки ба айбҷуӣ ва бадгумонӣ нисбат ба мардум афтӣ.”» Маънояш ин аст, ки инсон бояд аз такаббуриву худписандӣ ва айбҷуии дигарон парҳез кунад; ибодат вақте арзишманд аст, ки бо тавозуъ ва поки

🕊3

28 Jul 2026, 09:15 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @pnhmdaPhoto

﴾Эй паёмбар, ба занону духтарони худ ва занони мӯъминон бигӯ, ки чодари худро бар сар пӯшанд. Ин муносибтар аст, то шинохта шаванд ва мавриди озор воқеъ нагарданд. Ва Худо омурзандаву меҳрубон аст!﴿ Сураи Аҳзоб Хитоб ба онҳое, ки мегуянд ҳиҷоб фарз нест ва аз дин нест ва...ва...‼️ https://t.me/pnhmda

🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jhgffhbn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“إستزد من العلم قبل أن يرفع” (@jhgffhbn), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jhgffhbn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.