Channel
@jetstreamtrade
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
359,380subscribers
-3,117 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002027455261 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jetstreamtrade |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jetstreamtrade |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 359,380 | -470 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:58 | 359,850 | -489 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 360,339 | -545 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 360,884 | -592 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 361,476 | -480 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 361,956 | -541 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 362,497 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 13 August 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
237 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 128 | 54.0% | |
| ❤ | 52 | 21.9% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 10.1% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 5.91% | |
| ❤🔥 | 7 | 2.95% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 2.11% | |
| 🤔 | 3 | 1.27% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.844% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.422% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.422% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 August 2025 to 18 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
📢 Important Announcement - Jetstream Trading Suspension Team, We're writing to inform you that we are suspending Jetstream trading effective this afternoon. This was not an easy decision, but after our recent TGE failed to secure the additional capital needed, we cannot guarantee our ability to maintain the high-quality service you deserve beyond this month. What happens next: - All existing futures positions will…
❤14👍12🤯5😱2🤔1
📢 $PASC Promotional Staking of @pascalclearing is live Earn: - 6m → 15% - 1y → 25% - 2y → 35% - Jetstream Points Only ~6.7% of supply unlocked at TGE (~666,213 tokens) 📖 Full TGE guide → https://pascalprotocol.com/blog-and-news/how-to-participate
❤8👏2👍1
📣 Pascal Protocol just dropped 2 big updates: 1. TGE Guide is Live — everything you need to join the $PASC launch today! 2. Stylus Case Study — how Jetstream was built on Pascal’s clearing logic using Rust + Arbitrum Stylus Pascal clears. Jetstream trades. Together we scale serious DeFi. 🚀 Check it out: Pascalprotocol.com/blog-and-news/how-to-participate Blog.arbitrum.io/how-pascal-is-building-the-clearinghouse-…
❤🔥7🔥1
📢 Trading rewards that actually scale. Jetstream’s XP system turns every position into progress — and every referral into compounding upside. 💠 XP for trading 💠 25% on referred trader’s XP 💠 Leaderboards, visibility, and future token conversion Get rewarded like a pro: https://rewards.jetstream.trade
🔥10❤5👏1💯1
📢 New blog drop: “The On-Chain Desk Is Already Here — Jetstream Just Turned the Lights On” Every pro trader wanted a proper DeFi desk. Jetstream built it — clearing engine, risk logic, margin engine and all. 📖 Read now: https://jetstream.trade/blog/onchain-desk
👍7❤1
📢 Final call, Galxe crew 🚨 Pascal TGE goes live on Sept 9. Jetstream is built on it — and our Galxe campaign ends Sept 8. Last chance to: 🪂 Claim your Golden Access NFT 📈 Earn XP 📨 Refer & get 25% 🎁 Join the future of DeFi clearing Finish strong → https://app.galxe.com/quest/CVEX/GC4GVt6sVV
🔥11❤1
📢 New blog drop: Don’t Call It a DEX: Why Jetstream Trades Like a Desk Jetstream isn’t built for click-to-trade flow. It’s engineered for desks that size, hedge, structure, and manage risk. 📖 Read → https://jetstream.trade/blog/not-a-dex
🔥10
🧠 Blog drop: The Clearing Engine Is the Alpha Engine If your strategy is tight, your clearing should be smarter. Jetstream delivers: - Portfolio margin - Structured execution - Real-time clearing 📖 Read → https://jetstream.trade/blog/clearing-alpha
🔥11
🚀 Jetstream VS Hyperliquid: The Results Are In Perps look easy until you run the numbers. Jetstream futures, with real on-chain clearing and portfolio margining, deliver 9x more profit than Hyperliquid perps. 🎥 Watch the explainer. Futures are here. Perps are history. 👉 Trade smarter: https://rewards.jetstream.trade 👉 Blog about it: jetstream.trade/blog/jetstream-vs-others
🔥13
New blog live: “If we win everyone wins” Isolated margin is outdated. If the 1970 Tradfi designed a casino it would have been hyped like current crypto CEX and DEX. Flashy lines on speed and throughput, but with a fuel burn that would bankrupt a small country. Exchanges second biggest revenue is residuals from early liquidations on Isolated Margin. It’s easy to hand back your transaction fees if liquidation residual…
👏11
📢 New blog drop: “Built for Precision: Why Execution Quality Still Breaks in DeFi” Most DeFi venues don’t clear strategy. They just fill fragments. Jetstream clears structure, at speed, with logic. 📖 Read → https://jetstream.trade/blog/execution-breaks
🔥10
📢 Weekly reminder: Trading on Jetstream is now directly tied to your XP. ✅ Every filled trade builds your reputation ✅ Every referral unlocks 25% of their XP ✅ Every point moves you up the leaderboard Check your stats & share your link: https://rewards.jetstream.trade
🔥11❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jetstreamtrade. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 11,975 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
5 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“JetStream Trading Platform” (@jetstreamtrade), 359,380 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jetstreamtrade.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.