怎么最近天天能买到1000块以下的美光 😢
🤣1

Channel
@jenniesph
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,398subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002836151643 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jenniesph |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jenniesph |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:32 | 1,398 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 1,397 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:37 | 1,397 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 6 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 June 2026 – 29 July 2026) |
| Views total | 1,562 |
| Reactions total | 8 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 22:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
26 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 16 | 61.5% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 11.5% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 3.85% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
怎么最近天天能买到1000块以下的美光 😢
🤣1
未来有一个严重的问题:人类会越来越怀疑自己的价值 现在大多数的工作 人类几乎都干不过AI 如果你做的事AI都可以比你做的更好 那你学这个、做这个的意义在哪呢? 我现在感觉交易算是目前还可以让自己保持有一些成就感的事情 AI可以辅助分析、寻找机会、做出建议 但是最终下达Buy和Sell命令 以及承担结果仍然必须要自己来 就算长期运行的AI策略需要不断的调整 有的策略一段时间可以盈利 但可能过两天就失效了 都需要自己来当老板 把AI当成员工用好 感觉人的一生 可能就是在对抗虚无感 AI的时代会让虚无感更加强烈 只能不断的探寻 不断找事情投入了
❤1
不知道有多少人和我一样,因为社会对于“专注”的鼓励和奖赏,会不定期陷入对自己多兴趣多任务并行的自我怀疑,今天让claude帮我心理按摩了一下,推荐了Emilie Wapnick 的 multipotentialite 框架,感受好多了 推荐和我有一样困扰的朋友们也看看这个TED演讲: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4sZdcB6bjI8&t=333s
世界杯结束了 四年一次的狂欢和每天都有充实的期待 恭喜西班牙🇪🇸! 梦回2010读初中的我和我爸坐在客厅凌晨坚守西班牙夺冠 16年可真快啊! 下届世界杯西班牙见!
🥰3👍1
多日不见 Base变天了
Base今天这件事情看的挺难过的,某种意义上,jesse是在亲手告别一个自己花了几年时间相信、推动,甚至亲自参与创造的未来。 看完之后,我突然想起了一种特别具体的感觉。 我进币圈已经 13 年了。 久到见过太多东西,刚出来的时候像是未来已经提前降临,后来消失的时候,却连一句正式的告别都没有。 2017 年底,我几乎每天都在倒腾 CryptoKitties。那时候 ETH 一路暴涨,我还会在饭桌上一本正经地跟一群成年人解释这些猫。 现在想起来,我当时听上去应该挺像个神经病的。 但我真正想讲的,从来不只是几张卡通猫的图片。 我以为自己看到的是数字所有权刚刚开始,是文化和创作会慢慢搬到链上,是互联网终于有机会变成一个用户真正拥有自己作品和收藏品的地方。 我没觉得自己撞上了一场疯狂的投机泡沫。 我只是觉得,我比其他人稍微早一点看见了未来。 然后 2018 年来了,几乎把我抢了个精光。 钱没得很快,但那个念头,过了很…
❤1😭1
这些天除了睡觉吃饭看世界杯和一些基本的工作之外,其他时间都在陪伴Fable 5 最好的时代
$100 ➡️ $2,900 的机会 在 @polyvaults_ai 梭哈阿根廷和西班牙 https://app.polyvaults.ai/strategies/world-cup-2026
https://waitlist.arcus.xyz/s/JENNIEKUSU Robinhood 的去中心化交易所 早来早享福
一觉醒来发现买到了 感谢昨天的meta
转发一位朋友圈老师写的,也是最近工作中感触很深很有共鸣的: 看到支付行业的创始人写的一段感悟,我觉得很有深度和前瞻性,共享一下。 另外一个支付公司Airwallex刚拿到$320million 融资的背后要做企业端AI记账、treasury management、会计系统。 会计系统的竞争者最后可能是支付公司,而并不是Saas会计记账软件。 传统公司与AI-native公司本质差别: 一,AI时代,创始团队能力包括:技术判断、产品判断、组织判断、安全和治理判断、社会叙事能力。 二,找人。过去CEO找人,主要是招核心高管、关键的工程师、销售总监、产品总监,但在AI-native的公司里,找人不只是填岗位,而是建立一种人才密度。他需要的不是普通意义的聪明人,而是能处理复杂tension的人。 三,在AI-native公司里,影响力不再只来自title,而是来自位置问题,要看关键节点,比如模型能力、产品转化、agent工作…
❤5🥰2
对不起最近因为伦敦夏天超高温把整个人给热懵了 谁能想到2026年了堂堂国际大都市的公寓里是没有空调的公交车是没有空调的 大脑属于是死了一遍又一遍了🙂
🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jenniesph. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@jenniesph named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jennie's PH” (@jenniesph), 1,398 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenniesph.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.