Channel
@jenaeekhanee
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
748subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001234735716 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jenaeekhanee |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jenaeekhanee |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 748 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:16 | 750 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 749 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 749 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (20 June 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,072 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Aug 2026, 21:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
173 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 50 | 28.9% | |
| 🔥 | 44 | 25.4% | |
| 👌 | 37 | 21.4% | |
| 🤯 | 18 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 13 | 7.51% | |
| 💯 | 11 | 6.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 173reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نجوا دنبال قاتلی زنجیرهایست. قاتل زنان گمشده تهران. او چیزهایی میداند که پلیس هم خبر ندارد. او چیزهایی میداند که قاتل را برای کشتنش ترغیب میکند. 🔴رمان مسیر روباه / قسمت چهاردهم 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/W6tjCXHyTJU @jenaeekhanee
👌6👏1
ناف نقی رو به قول خواهرش با جنایت بریده بودن. این رو به بازپرس پروندهای گفت که روی قتل شوهر خواهر نقی تحقیق میکرد ولی نقی حرف خواهرش رو قبول نداره. اون میگه دامادمون رو کشتم چون به جای محبت به خواهرم عاشق سگش شده بود. کی راست میگه؟ کی دروغ میگه؟ 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/bjZBKzjSu_8 @jenaeekhanee
👍7👏1
هر پروندهای که در کانال من منتشر میشود، حاصل سالها تجربه و مطالعه، ساعتها تحقیق و همینطور هزینهی تولید و ساخت ویدیوست. اما کانال Wow Persian محتوای آمادهی من را برمیدارد، با نام خودش منتشر میکند و از آن درآمد به دست میآورد. اسم این کار الهام گرفتن یا تولید محتوا نیست؛ استفادهی بدون اجازه از محتوای دیگران است و این کار غیرقانونی است. از شما میخواهم به کانال Wow Persian بروید و محترمانه، بدون توهین و تهدید،…
👌8👍4
نجوا دنبال قاتلی زنجیرهایست. قاتل زنان گمشده تهران. او چیزهایی میداند که پلیس هم خبر ندارد. او چیزهایی میداند که قاتل را برای کشتنش ترغیب میکند. 🔴رمان مسیر روباه / قسمت سیزدهم 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/TUZ8hr7U5hE @jenaeekhanee
👌4👍1🤯1
پرونده خانوادهکشی رستوران خورشید قزوین که هنوز بیشتر از یک هفته از ماجراش نگذشته یکی از هولناکترین انواع خانوادهکشی در ایرانه از این جهت که یه مرد موفق و شناختهشده پسر نوجوانش رو با خودش همراه میکنه تا در قتل همسر و دختر هشت ساله شریک بشه و همه اینا به خاطر عشق پدر به یه دختر 22 است. این پرونده درباره جزییاتی است که نزدیکان خانواده قربانی از ماجرا گفتند و البته با چاشنی تحلیل روانشناسی. 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://yo…
🤯7🔥2
نجوا دنبال قاتلی زنجیرهایست. قاتل زنان گمشده تهران. او چیزهایی میداند که پلیس هم خبر ندارد. او چیزهایی میداند که قاتل را برای کشتنش ترغیب میکند. 🔴رمان مسیر روباه / قسمت دوازدهم 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/ADjfncFheK4 @jenaeekhanee
🔥6
صبح یک روز سرد پاییزی دوتا چمدون قرمز توجه یه زن رو به خودش جلب کرد. چمدون کنار ریل راهآهن گذاشته شده بود و روی اون یه کاغذ بود. یه کاغذ که لکههای خون داشت و روش نوشته شده بود عاقبت زن بدکاره. زن چمدون رو باز کرد و ... این پرونده هولناک چینی شباهت عجیبی به نمونههای ایرانی داره و شاید برای همینه که باید گفت هیولاها و شیاطین همهجا شبیه هم هستن. 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/kAoHrkFtS_M @jenaeekhanee
🔥6
نجوا دنبال قاتلی زنجیرهایست. قاتل زنان گمشده تهران. او چیزهایی میداند که پلیس هم خبر ندارد. او چیزهایی میداند که قاتل را برای کشتنش ترغیب میکند. 🔴رمان مسیر روباه / قسمت یازدهم 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/WbBt80N51Bc @jenaeekhanee
🔥6👌1
سال 94 همه درباره یه متجاوز حرف میزدن که شبا میره توی خونههای شیراز و به زنها توی خواب تجاوز میکنه. مردی که نقشههای عجیبی برای ورود به خونهها میکشه مثلا چرب کردن بدن خودش با روغن یا پخش ماده بیهوشی از دریچه کولر.اما هیچی شگفتانگیزتر از روش پلیس برای پیدا کردنش نبود. این ویدیو جزییات موثق پرونده مرد ژلهای شیرازه و تحلیل روانی اون. 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/cMmxLo8aVMw @jenaeekhanee
👏11👍3
نجوا دنبال قاتلی زنجیرهایست. قاتل زنان گمشده تهران. او چیزهایی میداند که پلیس هم خبر ندارد. او چیزهایی میداند که قاتل را برای کشتنش ترغیب میکند. 🔴رمان مسیر روباه / قسمت دهم 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/j33bihnWvB8 @jenaeekhanee
🔥4👍3
کی فکرش رو میکنه در حالی که روحش از هیچی خبر نداره و مشغول تماشای تلویزیونه زنگ خونهاش بخوره و شوخی شوخی بیفته توی پرونده یه قتل؟ کی فکرش رو میکنه شب آماده خوابیدنه و اون تماس کاری میکشوندش به قتلگاه؟ همه این اتفاقها توی این پرونده افتادن و ... 🔴اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/uIyuexvGtn0 @jenaeekhanee
👍9👌2
حالا تقریبا همه میدونن همه قاتلای زنجیرهای از راههای ترسناک به قربانیهاشون نزدیک نمیشن. بیشترشون با جلب اعتماد افراد رو شکار میکنن اما یه دسته هستن که الگوی جلب اعتمادشون سالهاست تغییر نکرده و حتی توی کشورهای مختلف عین هم رفتار میکنن. این پرونده درباره یکی از این قاتلها و تحلیل رفتار اوناست تا راههای به خطرافتادنتون رو کمتر کنه. 🔴 اینجا ببینید: https://youtu.be/PgyHONok0Pg @jenaeekhanee
👌7👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jenaeekhanee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 420,886 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جناییخوانی با لاله زارع” (@jenaeekhanee), 748 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jenaeekhanee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.