Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Жан-Поль Алкоголь

Channel

Жан-Поль Алкоголь

@jeanpaulalco

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,243subscribers

+44 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002331703410
TypeChannel
Username@jeanpaulalco
DescriptionКанал алкогольного маркетолога 🥃 Здесь делюсь секретами и новостями алкогольной индустрии. ✉️ По всем вопросам: [email protected] YouTube: https://youtube.com/@jeanpaulalco Inst: @jean_paulalco
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jeanpaulalco

Growth

8,1998,2438,2217 August 2026 — 8,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,199 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,203 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,222 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,233 subscribers16 August 2026 — 8,243 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net +44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,192–8,250 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 16:488,243+10
13 Aug 2026, 09:468,233+11
10 Aug 2026, 14:128,222+19
7 Aug 2026, 10:238,203+4
7 Aug 2026, 00:308,199no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:188,199first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 8,243 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,020
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 16 August 2026
Posts held23 (4 June 202616 August 2026)
Views total24,120
Reactions total374
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Aug 2026, 04:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
44
Videos
5
Links
107

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,284 reactions across 21 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍34626.9%
custom 518820235619758030019615.3%
🔥17913.9%
🤔1138.80%
🍾1078.33%
custom 5294063816756194997755.84%
🤝745.76%
634.91%
👏513.97%
💯332.57%
😢191.48%
🤯151.17%
🤣50.389%
👎40.312%
🗿30.234%
🤡10.078%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,284reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 22 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jeanpaulalco. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 June 2026 to 16 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

16 Aug 2026, 08:29 UTC≈1,630 views42 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🔝 Рейтинг лучших брендов и видов армянского коньяка. в новом видео. Смотрите новое видео на удобной платформе ❤️ 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Видео

👍28custom 51882023561975803008🤝32🤡1

11 Aug 2026, 07:55 UTC≈3,250 views80 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Продажи алкоголя в кафе и ресторанах рухнули более чем на 42% ↘️ В первом полугодии продажи алкоголя (без учета пива) в сегменте HoReCa (а это не только кафе и рестораны, но и отели) сократились сразу на 42,4% в сравнении с аналогичным периодом прошлого года. При этом снижение продаж в рознице оказалось символическим — всего 0,65%. Наибольшее падение, что логично, показала винодельческая продукция — 44,8%. Основны

💯33👏15👍9🤔8custom 51882023561975803008😢32🍾2

7 Aug 2026, 07:13 UTC≈4,210 views62 reactions1 Starread 18 August 2026

🔝 Рейтинг лучших марок российской водки среднего сегмента в новом видео. Смотрите новое видео на удобной платформе ❤️ 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Видео

👍40custom 518820235619758030010🔥8👎2👏2

2 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈5,250 views79 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Список лучших российских вин стоимостью до 1000 рублей в новом видео. Смотрите новое видео на удобной платформе ❤️ 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Видео

👍48🔥10custom 51882023561975803009👏5🤣42🍾1

31 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTC≈4,940 views47 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Poll

Сами водочные бренды намеренно не привожу, только названия производителей ⤵️

  1. Novabev Group (бывш. Beluga Group)33%
  2. Алкогольная Сибирская Группа14%
  3. Татспиртпром27%
  4. Roust (Руст)2%
  5. Ladoga25%
  6. Башспирт8%
  7. Иткульский спиртзавод4%
  8. ЛВЗ Саранский46%
  9. КЛВЗ Кристалл11%
  10. Другой производитель8%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

🤔21custom 518820235619758030013🔥5custom 52940638167561949974🍾21👏1

26 Jul 2026, 08:24 UTC≈4,840 views64 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Слепая сравнительная дегустация пива из пяти стран. ❓Какое окажется лучше? ❓Можно ли определить страну вслепую? Смотрите новое видео на удобной платформе ❤️ 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Видео

👍30🔥16custom 5188202356197580300113👏3🤝1

19 Jul 2026, 12:11 UTC≈5,520 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026

🎥 Друзья, напоминаю, сегодня отмечаем ДЕНЬ РОЖДЕНИЯ моего YouTube-канала ❤️ 🕘 Встречаемся в 19:00 (мск). Подключайтесь, задавайте вопросы и выигрывайте напитки! ⛓ https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PfK6ZleQ20

🍾45🔥15custom 51882023561975803007custom 52940638167561949971

17 Jul 2026, 09:56 UTC≈5,260 views68 reactionsread 18 August 2026

Posted without readable text

25custom 518820235619758030018🔥8custom 52940638167561949978👍7👏1🤝1

16 Jul 2026, 12:53 UTC≈4,070 views77 reactionsread 18 August 2026
Photo

❗ Дорогие любители, ценители и знатоки алкоголя! В воскресенье 19 июля в 19:00 по МСК состоится прямой эфир в честь дня рождения канала — уже 2 года вы смотрите мои видео. На стриме мы сможем поговорить об алкоголе, я буду отвечать на ваши вопросы, а также традиционно разыграю несколько прекрасных напитков (главные призы будут французскими). Присоединяйтесь к трансляции. Буду всех ждать💋 🔗 https://www.youtube.com/

🍾44🔥23custom 518820235619758030082

13 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC≈4,760 views47 reactionsread 18 August 2026

«Башспирт» может быть продан «Росспиртпрому» Вслед за «Татспиртпромом» крупнейший производитель спирта в России может купить еще и «Башспирт». На прошлой неделе появились слухи об интересе «Росспиртпрома» к алкогольной компании, принадлежащей Башкирии. Событие, если оно случится, станет немаловажным, и вот, что здесь важно отметить. В последнее время «Росспиртпром» очень активно проявляет интерес к алкогольным комп

🤔30custom 518820235619758030010🤝41🤯1custom 52940638167561949971

12 Jul 2026, 08:39 UTC≈4,590 views54 reactionsread 18 August 2026

😔 Рейтинг лучших марок бюджетной российской водки в новом видео. Смотрите на удобной платформе ⬇️ 📺 YouTube 📺 VK Видео

👍32🔥8custom 518820235619758030084👎1custom 52940638167561949971

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @jeanpaulalco. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

31 Jul 2026, 09:39 UTCAnonymous Poll568 voters

Сами водочные бренды намеренно не привожу, только названия производителей ⤵️

  1. Novabev Group (бывш. Beluga Group)33%
  2. Алкогольная Сибирская Группа14%
  3. Татспиртпром27%
  4. Roust (Руст)2%
  5. Ladoga25%
  6. Башспирт8%
  7. Иткульский спиртзавод4%
  8. ЛВЗ Саранский46%
  9. КЛВЗ Кристалл11%
  10. Другой производитель8%

The shares total 178%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Jun 2026, 11:25 UTCAnonymous Poll819 voters

Коньяки какого дагестанского предприятия вы предпочитаете?

  1. Кизлярский коньячный завод31%
  2. Дербентский коньячный комбинат39%
  3. Другой завод3%
  4. Не люблю дагестанские коньяки33%

The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 16 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 937,638 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Жан-Поль Алкоголь” (@jeanpaulalco), 8,243 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jeanpaulalco.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.