Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 华天通知群

Channel

华天通知群

@jdtzq

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,798subscribers

+175 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002476184847
TypeChannel
Username@jdtzq
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jdtzq

Growth

6,6236,7986,710.58 August 2026 — 6,623 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,633 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,663 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,670 subscribers18 August 2026 — 6,690 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,703 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,734 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,787 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,798 subscribers8 August 202630 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net +175. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,597–6,824 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 13:076,798+11
27 Aug 2026, 19:186,787+53
24 Aug 2026, 23:586,734+31
21 Aug 2026, 05:056,703+13
18 Aug 2026, 11:126,690+20
15 Aug 2026, 03:166,670+7
12 Aug 2026, 06:526,663+30
9 Aug 2026, 00:566,633+10
8 Aug 2026, 10:196,623first reading

Engagement

36 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.35%
avg views ÷ 6,798 subscribers
Avg views / post
228
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
36
of 36 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held36 (7 August 202619 August 2026)
Views total8,200
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
7m 50s
Average length
24s

Measured directly from 20 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC404 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

动动团队 代号秋 经纬度格式错误,全部扣除

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC435 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号二 重庆 手写日期错误 全部扣除

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC290 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号新 贵州 相同地点,相同车辆,巡查现场无贴纸残留 全部扣除

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC243 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号a 湖北 贴纸打印不合格扣除20%

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC198 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号A6 贴纸打印不合格扣除20%视频开头第一张贴纸需清晰展示扣除30%

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC191 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

来过团队 代号小崽 视频开头第一张贴纸需清晰展示扣除30%

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC152 viewsread 20 August 2026
Video

来过团队 代号大海 内蒙古 开工视频无任何可查询的标志性建筑物,全部扣除

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC144 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号风 黑龙江 视频 4 5 6 78 9 10 为小区做单,超出小区做单比例的30% 扣除30%视频开头未环绕四周扣30%

19 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC139 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号结 水印无工作时长拍照张数全部扣除

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC187 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

来过团队 代号豹子(黑龙江绥化) 相同地点相同车辆,现场巡查无我司贴纸,全部扣除

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC195 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

来过团队 代号W(贵州贵阳) 公里数未及时更新,全部扣除

11 Aug 2026, 11:19 UTC299 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

来过团队 代号五洲(辽宁沈阳) 水印相机备注网址错误,全部扣除

Showing the 12 most recent of 36 posts we hold for @jdtzq. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,151,731 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“华天通知群” (@jdtzq), 6,798 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jdtzq.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.