Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
七七的小家
@jdjjdjdjjjdsj
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+10 since we began measuring on 11 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004486946564 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jdjjdjdjjjdsj |
| Created | 17 August 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 11 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jdjjdjdjjjdsj |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:20 | 184 | +10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 02:22 | 174 | no change |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:47 | 174 | first reading |
Engagement
6 posts held, back to 17 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 266.3%
- avg views ÷ 184 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 490
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 6 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 6 (17 August 2026 – 9 September 2026) |
| Views total | 490 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Sept 2026, 02:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 17 August 2026 to 9 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
【台州同盟会】 https://t.me/tztmn3 【验证时间】:2026-08-21 【老师名字】:妍妍 【老师账号】:@xdbweri 【验证留名】:背着善宰跑 【人照相似】:7 【颜值身材】:9 【服务评分】:8 【态度评分】:9 【课室环境】:9 【体验过程】:约到老师,在楼下等了几分钟,一看包臀裙一起上电梯,地下室上了别的住户我就先下电梯了,后面问了老师果然是她,重新上电梯,开门一眼大长腿翘臀,本人比照片好看,颜值也是越来越喜欢,声音有点御姐,一起洗了,然后在沙发上口下 调情,后面换到床上,口一会,ls姨妈刚走就没选择舔下面,不过里面肉确实很粉,毛量也少,熊很挺手感不错,戴套做的时候,里面很烫,反馈叫声贼好听,换了几个姿势后爽快出货。不会女上也没要求,亲和蛇都能满足,只是ls本身不怎么喜欢亲。黄皮嫩妹,妆容配合眼神很有魅劲,是个不错的选择。事后ls也表示前任都说她叫声好听,最后也是骚骚的送我出门。
开课了
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Channel photo updated
Channel created
Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @jdjjdjdjjjdsj. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“七七的小家” (@jdjjdjdjjjdsj), 184 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jdjjdjdjjjdsj.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.