Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

跑路机场难民收容所

@jcplnanmin

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

25,710subscribers

+257 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001514015618
TypeChannel
Username@jcplnanmin
Description跑路机场难民交流群:https://t.me/jichangnmjl 仅供参考,便宜好用,稳定性我也不知道,跑了别找我,经济充裕的请找大机场 有任何问题请私聊: @Baobaoapbot
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jcplnanmin

Growth

25,45325,71025,581.57 August 2026 — 25,453 subscribers7 August 2026 — 25,453 subscribers8 August 2026 — 25,492 subscribers9 August 2026 — 25,535 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,556 subscribers10 August 2026 — 25,568 subscribers11 August 2026 — 25,599 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25,645 subscribers14 August 2026 — 25,710 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +257. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,414–25,749 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 04:5625,710+65
12 Aug 2026, 22:4925,645+46
11 Aug 2026, 19:4325,599+31
10 Aug 2026, 22:5625,568+12
10 Aug 2026, 02:1125,556+21
9 Aug 2026, 05:0325,535+43
8 Aug 2026, 02:5525,492+39
7 Aug 2026, 06:1525,453no change
7 Aug 2026, 06:0325,453first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 10 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.2%
avg views ÷ 25,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,220
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026
Posts held16 (10 February 202613 August 2026)
Views total24,860
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 04:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
89
Videos
1
Links
37

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

13 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC≈2,200 viewsread 15 August 2026

#频道推荐 #金主 📢 云图机场正式上线开业公告 尊敬的用户: 感谢您关注 云图机场 (CloudMap)!经过前期的精心筹备与部署,我们的网络服务现已正式上线 云图机场全面采用 金融级专线传输,依托高规格跨境专线与优质节点拓扑,保障高峰期依然 低延迟、零丢包,为您提供 24 小时全天候稳定、高速、流畅 的跨境网络体验 ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🎁 开业首发优惠 为感谢首批用户的支持,结账时输入专属优惠码即可享受开业折扣 🏷 专属优惠码:yt88(点击即可复制) ⏰ 有效期限:即日起 3 个月内有效(截至 2026 年 11 月 4 日) ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🌟 核心优势 ⚡️ 金融级专线|全线高规格专线传输,三网优化,高峰期依然极速稳定 🟢 流媒体解锁|完美解锁 ChatGPT、Netflix、TikTok 等主流服务及冷门原生 IP 🟢 透明高性价比|节点倍率统一 1 倍,绝无高倍扣费陷

12 Aug 2026, 14:02 UTC≈2,920 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#频道推荐 #金主 【FastUP VPN】通报时期的“唯一”选择 网络环境越复杂,越需要一个稳定、低特征、长期可用的备用方案。 FastUP VPN,主打私有协议 + 强加密 + 隐藏线路拓扑,不公开入口节点与落地 IP,降低被针对性扫描和清退的风险。 🚀 实测速度 🇸🇬 新加坡:461.97 Mbps / 28ms 🇭🇰 香港:460.85 Mbps / 78ms 🇺🇸 美国:399.63 Mbps / 230ms 🇹🇼 台湾:208.33 Mbps / 65ms 🇯🇵 日本:80.83 Mbps / 59ms Netflix、Disney+、YouTube 4K/8K 等主流流媒体实测均可正常使用。 两档套餐 Basic|¥32/月 • 200GB 流量 • 智能节点 • 2 台设备同时在线 Turbo|¥68/月 • IEPL 专线 • 不限流量 • 4 台设备同时在线 支持 Windows / macOS / Andr

7 Aug 2026, 10:02 UTC≈6,840 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#频道推荐 #金主 🎉 【平民白菜机场新选择】鲤云——21元/季!实测 3Gbps 极限网速的性价比大杀器 还在嫌低价机场选择太单一?鲤云 带着 VLESS 协议 + 3Gbps 爆表速度 来了 非常适合 既看重价格又讲究体验 的人群,不仅 价格不算贵,同时 实测速度极快,完美兼顾平民预算与拉满的网速体验 ✨ 线路与体验亮点 顶级拓扑:全节点 日本 AWS 统一入口 + Akari 落地,提供 29 个节点出口 速度爆表:港/日/新节点平均速度 1.1Gbps - 1.9Gbps,峰值直接冲到 3.1Gbps VLESS 协议:全系采用 VLESS 协议,兼顾高效率与主流客户端兼容 AI 与流媒体:日/新/美/台节点 100% 解锁 ChatGPT / Gemini / Claude 及主流 4K 影音 💡 选购建议 纯性价比之选:【特惠年付128G】90元/年,单 G 成本低至 0.059元/GB 无痛试错月付:【月付200G

29 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC≈12,900 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @sstrojan

据可靠消息奈云原团队已被贵州省黎平县公安立案侦查(墙洞之前也是贵州这边网安侦办的…),支付技术都被审查了,据悉月流水在被抓之前已做到200w级别,做机场选择支付定期换支付并且保护好数据库这些还是很重要的,之前不是数据库还出过事嘛,流水起来特征明显很容易顺着交易所被注意到!还有那些奈云的AFFman部分也被问话了。要注意和国内个人信息做好隔离尽量别在国内平台推广,现在这个年头小心低调才是王道…

6 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC≈22,600 viewsread 15 August 2026

#频道推荐 #金主 最近我给你们挖到一家影子网络同款架构的宝藏新秀 —— 锦云加速 🚀 不吹不黑,直接说大实话,这货走的就是“便宜量大、大力出飞砖”的硬核路线 💥 🌟 测速跑分直接看呆 入口直接砸钱上了 AWS 亚马逊云香港,晚高峰稳如老狗 🐕 实测大流量轰炸下,香港节点狂飙到 569MB/s 🚀 日本也稳在 200MB/s+,刷 8K 视频进度条随便拖 全系 FullCone 满血全开,打游戏联机、Discord 语音派对直接起飞,彻底告别 NAT 严格断连 🎮 🤖 流媒体/AI 原生全解 主力常用节点 IP 干净得像张白纸(风险值清一色 Low 0),日常查谷歌极少弹验证码 🔒 ChatGPT + Claude 核心节点双原生解锁,网飞、Disney+ 也是闭眼全绿,追剧党和生产力极客直接闭眼冲 🎬 💰 价格直接掀翻天花板(便宜量大本尊) 💸 试水无压力:月付日常版只要 ¥9 就能拿走 100G 流量,

Signed 𝓫𝓪𝓸𝓫𝓪𝓸

30 Jun 2026, 16:34 UTC≈21,300 viewsread 15 August 2026

#慢讯 据多方最新反馈,目前 奈云 与 OKANC 两家机场已出现大面积异常,疑似跑路: ❌【官网失联】两家官方网站目前均已无法打开。 ❌【客服蒸发】目前联系不到任何客服人员。 ❌【节点全挂】所有网络节点已全部瘫痪。 ⚠️【安全提示】请广大用户近期「千万不要续费」!建议优先切换至备用线路观望,注意资产安全。

Signed 𝓫𝓪𝓸𝓫𝓪𝓸

26 May 2026, 07:51 UTC≈29,300 viewsread 15 August 2026

#慢讯 🚨 【行业预警】疑似通管局人员配合国内科研机构,正对多家机场进行定向测绘与取证 多位机场主及安全研究人员近日爆料,一个资金充足的“内鬼”账号正在多家机场批量购买三位数高价套餐。经反查核实,该账号关联邮箱为 [email protected],其实际控制人指向 广西通信管理局员工。目前不排除对方正在使用“爬虫+人工”双管齐下的方式进行取证。 ⚠️ 核心异常技术特征: 1️⃣ 国内真实网络源: 拉取订阅的 IP 并非来自海外或常规云主机,而是直接指向 北京朝阳某科研/单位网络 以及 国内某 985 高校校园科研区域(教育网)。 2️⃣ 典型测绘行为: 拿到订阅后,日志触发大量 Google、TG、YouTube 连通性测试,并疯狂请求 myip.ipip.net、api.ipify.org、ipinfo.io 等各大 IP 盲测 API,属于标准的脚本自动化跑节点特征。 3️⃣ 高危探针风险: 日志中多次出现 阿里云 I

28 Apr 2026, 00:12 UTC≈33,700 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @jichangtjPhoto

最出名的机场VPN商家(没有之一)——快连,倒闭了。此次封锁跑路的机场VPN里面最大的了。

25 Apr 2026, 04:52 UTC≈32,000 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @gebaopiCloudPhoto

上月我说目前是“科学上网数十年未有之大变局,恐怕都要回到直连时代”,有网友评论我过于悲观,只会散布恐慌情绪。我也一直希望是杞人忧天了。 但是目前来看,中转要么已被拔线,要么在被拔线路上,几尽绝迹。原来建议直连或自建,现在也因出国劣化,开始变得越来越艰难。甚至港澳流量卡也有部分地区运营商受限制的消息。按这趋势下去,不是翻不了,而是成本、精力、难度会陡然爬升。 过往二十年的科学上网黄金时代恐怕是要结束了,各种线路、测评、协议、工具百花齐放,一键式建节点,面板式建机场的日子,一度让我们有种错觉墙不再是墙。但是物理层面上的服务器、线路主控权永远是最强的降维打击。如果政策没有周期性松动或调整,那只会越来越难。 且用且珍惜吧⚜️

17 Apr 2026, 01:26 UTC≈27,300 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @jichangtj

目前国内中转基本废了95%+。 据多位机场主反馈,当前已开始执行向前追溯三个月的倒查机制——凡是在过去三个月内曾被通报过的线路,也会被陆续拔线处理。 这意味着,即便是目前未被拔的漏网之鱼,也很可能只是暂时存活,随时面临被拔线的风险。 目前可以说是“一机难求”,只能暂时依靠境外中转或直连勉强维持。走公网出海,对移动和联通的影响相对较小;电信网如果不是走优化线路体验会非常糟糕。如果是高强度翻墙,建议尽量避开电信线路。

31 Mar 2026, 08:13 UTC≈38,700 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @haitun_channelPhoto

《暴力拔线?庄家洗盘?接下来会如何变化?》 原本以为两会后会风平浪静,但广东三网的大批量拔线显示,此轮整顿似乎超出了例行检查的范畴,更像是一场大清洗。 1、短期局势预测: 过去三年代理门槛过低,导致各类中转、专线泛滥,代理用户的人数超过上头的 “指标” 限度。现在绳子收紧,那些政—企关联不深的中间商将被率先清洗,类比大 A 里的庄家洗盘套路。 受供给侧影响,🇭🇰方向专线成本攀升将是未来几个月的常态。目前「拔线潮」虽大多在广东 (粤港) 频发,但沪日入口难保不被波及。 按:昆明和南宁 GFW 出入口局的进度推迟(原定 2025 年 12 月底加载流量),或许反映了上头对「合规化」的更高要求。若没猜错,在新的 GFW 出入口局正式加载流量前,此轮「拔线潮」仍会持续下去。 2、长期局势猜测: 从十五五规划来看,国内的开放政策不会收紧,其定调的「制度型开放」算是定心丸。更重要的是,反映在 #海缆 工程方面,上一个五年计划里拍

29 Mar 2026, 11:50 UTC≈24,500 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @jichangtjPhoto

国内中转可能已经部署翻墙流量检测系统, 真实性较高。 手上已经有机场由于暂无中转入口暂时停摆几天。

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @jcplnanmin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@jcplnanmin edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,027,103 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“跑路机场难民收容所” (@jcplnanmin), 25,710 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jcplnanmin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.