新币其实和皇冠其实是一家。 至于为什么怎么搞,因为新币会收到国际影响有很大概率崩盘。 那么皇冠可以名正言顺的取缔新币。 其实是局中局罢了。 所谓的梦幻早已远走高飞了。留下的都是新币幕后的股东布局罢了。

Channel
Java逮捕
@java
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
17,609subscribers
-7 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002489094154 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @haohuoji @java |
| Description | 逮捕行动 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/java |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 14:55 | 17,609 | +7 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 17,602 | -14 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 17,616 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:46 | 17,616 | first reading |
Engagement
17 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 18.3%
- avg views ÷ 17,609 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 3,230
- 17 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 17
- of 17 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 17 (24 July 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 54,880 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 00:28 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 58
- Videos
- 6
- Links
- 8
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
新币大股东胡小伟已经被美国招安了。 这已经是最好的结局了。 但是呢在新币上押的数据,内部消息老美现在可以直接查看。 我觉得各位肯定懂这个意思吧? 老美现在可以无限利用新币。
网友投稿: 惊天大瓜!🤣 因两人给湖南省郴州市宜章县公安局某领导设套,长年混迹于电报 NFT 圈子的红红女帝与贩毒王子王开坚,被湖南警方发出悬赏令,最高悬赏25万元!
联系了几个人,柬埔寨担保只是跑路了,他只是说被抓了,只是借口。
早已通知。希望你们听劝。
柬埔寨担保已跑路 负责人: @huhu 已注销账号 供需发布人员正在出售供需频道 @tgwifi, @jpzpp, @dava, @huhu, @timmo, @sebi, @ribi, @ss_ll, @jpzaa, @jpzzy, @jpzbb, @jpzkefu, @jpznb, @jpzvv, @jpzss, @jpzdb, @uu11mm +88806964750 | +88808673921 | +88806386917 地址余额已转走:TXFdekFzM2mVRRh6L36PPob8PPeo3vvvZm
你们所谓的野鸡老担保 索隆 柬埔寨 顶级都相继跑路。
快GG了
其实很多担保啊,钱已经挣够了,就算是野鸡担保多多少少也挣个十多万吧。 他们也做不起来了。 再加上,捕头这边疯狂出🐔。 目前野鸡担保小担保已经察觉到危险了。 他们害怕某一天在家忽然被敲门迎接他的将是手铐。
因为最近跑路的野鸡太多了,然后旺旺担保又是最野鸡的那个,如果他现在卖那就是最低价格卖出去,所以他要等这波风波过了。然后再打着收购的旗号搞波流量,最后再撤离。 可惜捕头已经提前知道了他的想法。可惜可惜。
旺旺担保说我这是为了引流,然后在频道说我要卖担保了。 意思是作为一个担保方然后随随便便把自己的信誉卖掉?
这几天会随机空降群友。
Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @java. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 256,882 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 5
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 5
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@java named 5 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Java逮捕” (@java), 17,609 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/java.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.