Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jaume Vives

Channel

Jaume Vives

@jaumevivesvives

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,033subscribers

-68 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001403887997
TypeChannel
Username@jaumevivesvives
Created19 November 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/jaumevivesvives

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 74% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,0336,1016,0676 August 2026 — 6,101 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,101 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,099 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,093 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,092 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,091 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,085 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,078 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,075 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,066 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,062 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,054 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,045 subscribers19 September 2026 — 6,033 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net -68. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,023–6,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 06:016,033-12
14 Sept 2026, 18:166,045-9
10 Sept 2026, 21:586,054-8
5 Sept 2026, 13:006,062-4
1 Sept 2026, 20:076,066-9
30 Aug 2026, 01:066,075-3
26 Aug 2026, 14:186,078-7
19 Aug 2026, 20:356,085-6
16 Aug 2026, 19:356,091-1
13 Aug 2026, 03:276,092-1
9 Aug 2026, 18:426,093-6
7 Aug 2026, 00:086,099-2
6 Aug 2026, 18:306,101no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:196,101first reading

Engagement

13 posts held, back to 19 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,364 reactions across 13 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤77656.9%
🙏25418.6%
😢1017.40%
😁674.91%
👏624.55%
👍503.67%
🔥151.10%
😭80.587%
❤‍🔥60.44%
💯60.44%
🤮60.44%
🥰50.367%
🥴40.293%
👌20.147%
😈10.073%
🙊10.073%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 19 February 2026 to 23 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

23 Jul 2026, 10:56 UTC≈1,680 views44 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴Todos sabemos en qué acaban la mayoría de las promesas electorales, no obstante, desde aquí celebramos, aunque sin demasiado entusiasmo, una ley que ayude a tomar conciencia de que ese conjunto de células que la mujer custodia es mucho más que eso: https://www.eldebate.com/opinion/20260723/concebido-no-nacido_441726.html

❤38👍6

17 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC≈2,530 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 La niña más importante de Pamplona: https://gaceta.es/espana/la-nina-mas-importante-de-pamplona-20260716-0002/

❤39👏5👍3

2 Jul 2026, 08:38 UTC≈3,430 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 Hoy escribo sobre la facilidad que tenemos para justificarnos, rebajar el ideal e incluso convertirlo en indeseable por nuestra incapacidad de alcanzarlo. [¿Por qué no te haces protestante?] https://gaceta.es/opinion/por-que-no-te-haces-protestante-20260702-0115/

❤35👍11

28 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC≈3,670 views132 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤123🥰4👌2👍1🤮1🙊1

28 Jun 2026, 09:40 UTC≈2,240 views47 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴Fue una alegría que el Santo Padre bendijera a Jaumet (futuro santo de la familia) y hablar un rato con él. Me ha hecho mucha ilusión recibir estas primeras fotografías. Aunque demuestran que, efectivamente, no callé ni un minuto 🤷‍♂️🤦‍♂️ Aquí explico cómo fue el encuentro: https://www.eldebate.com/religion/20260611/visita-familiar_427774.html

❤41🙏5🤮1

11 Jun 2026, 17:03 UTC≈3,600 views45 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Y también comparto con vosotros este otro escrito que he publicado con motivo del viaje apostólico: [Un trozo de pan] https://www.eldebate.com/opinion/20260611/trozo-pan_427377.html

🙏27❤11👏5🤮2

11 Jun 2026, 16:42 UTC≈3,270 views66 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 He escrito esta crónica sobre la visita del Santo Padre y el regalo que ha supuesto para nuestra familia. In Illo uno unum. [Una visita muy familiar] https://www.eldebate.com/religion/20260611/visita-familiar_427774.html

❤37👏18🙏8🤮2😈1

31 May 2026, 18:01 UTC≈5,210 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁66👏28❤11👍8💯6🥴4

28 May 2026, 16:59 UTC≈4,090 views68 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 Hoy escribo sobre la próxima visita del Santo Padre a España. ALZAR LA MIRADA, SUBIR EL LISTÓN https://www.eldebate.com/opinion/20260528/alzar-mirada-subir-liston_422335.html

❤48👍14👏6

26 Mar 2026, 09:11 UTC≈8,090 views299 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 Da miedo la cantidad de gente que está animando a una niña de 25 años a que se suicide. En vez de agarrarla y abrazarla muy fuerte para que no salte están corriendo hacia ella para darle un empujón. Y lo más siniestro es que lo venden como algo compasivo y misericordioso. Médicos traicionando, una vez más, el juramento que un día hicieron. Una sociedad enferma que abandona (y empuja) en vez de acompañar. Un sistem…

❤148🙏97😢33😭8❤‍🔥6🔥6🥰1

25 Mar 2026, 18:49 UTC≈8,670 views224 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴🔴🔴 Esta noche a las 22:00 nos reuniremos frente al hospital Sant Camil de Sant Pere de Ribes para rezar por Noelia Castillo. Demasiados le han fallado pero tiene que saber que es importante para muchos, y que su vida es un regalo para todos nosotros. El mundo se está volviendo un lugar muy oscuro y que viva Noelia lo convertirá en un lugar mejor.

❤132🙏84👍5😢3

27 Feb 2026, 11:28 UTC≈5,830 views94 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🔴 Un niño ha sido asesinado por los pelos (concretamente los de su madre, que no quería interrumpir la depilación láser) y, lo mismo que por esa niña de pelo rojizo citada por Chesterton, el mundo entero debería arder. [Por los pelos] https://gaceta.es/opinion/por-los-pelos-20260226-0002/

😢65❤20🔥6👍2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @jaumevivesvives. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jaume Vives” (@jaumevivesvives), 6,033 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaumevivesvives.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.