Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jano García

Channel

Jano García

@janogarcia89

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

18,190subscribers

-398 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001295927972
TypeChannel
Username@janogarcia89
DescriptionCanal de Telegram de Jano García.
Created13 May 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/janogarcia89

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,19018,58818,3897 August 2026 — 18,588 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,588 subscribers7 August 2026 — 18,585 subscribers8 August 2026 — 18,583 subscribers9 August 2026 — 18,577 subscribers10 August 2026 — 18,572 subscribers11 August 2026 — 18,569 subscribers12 August 2026 — 18,558 subscribers14 August 2026 — 18,544 subscribers15 August 2026 — 18,537 subscribers16 August 2026 — 18,530 subscribers18 August 2026 — 18,527 subscribers19 August 2026 — 18,523 subscribers20 August 2026 — 18,519 subscribers22 August 2026 — 18,508 subscribers24 August 2026 — 18,503 subscribers25 August 2026 — 18,502 subscribers26 August 2026 — 18,499 subscribers27 August 2026 — 18,495 subscribers28 August 2026 — 18,485 subscribers29 August 2026 — 18,479 subscribers30 August 2026 — 18,477 subscribers31 August 2026 — 18,475 subscribers1 September 2026 — 18,468 subscribers2 September 2026 — 18,461 subscribers3 September 2026 — 18,449 subscribers5 September 2026 — 18,443 subscribers8 September 2026 — 18,429 subscribers11 September 2026 — 18,413 subscribers13 September 2026 — 18,407 subscribers15 September 2026 — 18,397 subscribers16 September 2026 — 18,385 subscribers19 September 2026 — 18,379 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,355 subscribers4 October 2026 — 18,329 subscribers8 October 2026 — 18,308 subscribers13 October 2026 — 18,290 subscribers14 October 2026 — 18,284 subscribers15 October 2026 — 18,280 subscribers16 October 2026 — 18,277 subscribers17 October 2026 — 18,267 subscribers19 October 2026 — 18,258 subscribers20 October 2026 — 18,252 subscribers22 October 2026 — 18,247 subscribers23 October 2026 — 18,238 subscribers24 October 2026 — 18,234 subscribers25 October 2026 — 18,227 subscribers26 October 2026 — 18,225 subscribers27 October 2026 — 18,217 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,206 subscribers28 October 2026 — 18,202 subscribers30 October 2026 — 18,200 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,195 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,196 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,192 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,190 subscribers7 August 20262 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 87 days, net -398. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,130–18,648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Nov 2026, 18:1018,190-2
1 Nov 2026, 20:5918,192-4
31 Oct 2026, 22:5918,196+1
31 Oct 2026, 00:1818,195-5
30 Oct 2026, 02:0618,200-2
28 Oct 2026, 22:4518,202-4
28 Oct 2026, 01:0818,206-11
27 Oct 2026, 02:5918,217-8
26 Oct 2026, 04:0918,225-2
25 Oct 2026, 03:4018,227-7
24 Oct 2026, 07:0718,234-4
23 Oct 2026, 04:5718,238-9
22 Oct 2026, 06:5118,247-5
20 Oct 2026, 20:5418,252-6
19 Oct 2026, 19:1918,258-9
17 Oct 2026, 19:2118,267-10
16 Oct 2026, 17:0518,277-3
15 Oct 2026, 16:3518,280-4
14 Oct 2026, 14:5118,284-6
13 Oct 2026, 05:0118,290first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.3%
avg views ÷ 18,190 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,880
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held42 (10 June 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total94,020
Reactions total1,283
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Nov 2026, 03:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
32
Videos
4
Links
797

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 3 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,782 reactions across 42 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👏1,10429.2%
👍91424.2%
🔥56314.9%
❤49513.1%
🤬3348.83%
🥰1584.18%
😢972.56%
😁772.04%
🎉220.582%
🤯100.264%
🤔50.132%
👎30.079%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 42 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,782 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

2 Nov 2026, 20:12 UTC≈1,300 views37 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Siniestra reaparición de Pedro Sánchez. https://youtu.be/YOlxFTLnRQU?si=J0Hax8mpfEZELiAr

❤19🔥11👍3👏3🥰1

29 Oct 2026, 20:17 UTC≈3,800 views96 reactionsread 3 November 2026

El Gobierno trata de esconder la verdad del accidente de Toledo. https://youtu.be/Oy4vbY_vVzA?si=s2Asdz0cpKiiGhN_

🤬69🔥15👍10❤2

28 Oct 2026, 20:11 UTC≈3,880 views78 reactionsread 3 November 2026

🔴 ESPECIAL: Nueva tragedia ferroviaria en España. https://youtu.be/Kn1d7tHis34?si=qpFUuFHP_ZJXKBGH

😢53🤬15❤8👍1🤯1

27 Oct 2026, 20:14 UTC≈4,030 views69 reactionsread 3 November 2026

La violencia y el caos se extienden por España. https://youtu.be/tDImPsX3tFU?si=GfBtMWDjy7nJ5OVc

👍43🔥15🤬7🥰3❤1

26 Oct 2026, 20:09 UTC≈4,190 views69 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Barcelona arde y Sánchez baila https://youtu.be/q6jBULgBubk?si=pM6uPqOW-dJciTYA

❤40🔥27🥰2

22 Oct 2026, 19:53 UTC≈6,050 views103 reactionsread 3 November 2026

La izquierda recurre a la violencia antes de las elecciones. https://youtu.be/KrxBObeNDLs?si=3aISynkZ6I_ydQEt

👍60🤬38🥰3🤯2

21 Oct 2026, 19:13 UTC≈6,450 views85 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Milei llega a España y la izquierda revienta las calles https://youtu.be/5-YjTIAVY6Y?si=Oe1tJs5C-i7Otc_H

👍66👏7❤6🥰6

20 Oct 2026, 19:18 UTC≈5,570 views64 reactionsread 3 November 2026

La trampa de Sánchez para controlar el Senado. https://youtu.be/77S5uIfuTKY?si=3zZH6M50cbGmwkRk

🔥43🤬10👍6🥰4👏1

19 Oct 2026, 19:19 UTC≈6,050 views67 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Un espectáculo repugnante. https://youtu.be/XYP7biyrq2o?is=GhWv2Wjj5llpyu8e

🔥39❤14👍10👏4

15 Oct 2026, 19:35 UTC≈8,040 views76 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Sánchez se queda sin su gran bandera. https://youtu.be/8Suslu2Aoos?si=f0_gYP6GcN_s9iqv

👏54👍17❤4👎1

13 Oct 2026, 19:20 UTC≈8,410 views123 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Ridículo apoteósico de Montse Minguez por su novio https://youtu.be/Donl2itIilM?si=aCY1zUqCWL1dDNlQ

🔥89😁16👍9❤4👏4🥰1

12 Oct 2026, 10:31 UTC≈7,050 views90 reactionsread 3 November 2026

Imperdible esta joya de Alberto Garín para celebrar el día de la Hispanidad. 🇪🇸 https://youtu.be/anl_3Lt_upo

❤64👍22👏3🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @janogarcia89. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jano García” (@janogarcia89), 18,190 subscribers as measured 2 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janogarcia89.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.