2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 64โ66 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 14:45
65
no change
27 Aug 2026, 14:30
65
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 25 December 2024 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
9
Links
3
Lifetime counters from Telegramโs own channel header, read 27 August 2026 โ not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโs rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
74 reactions across 15 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
๐
35
47.3%
โค
25
33.8%
๐ฅ
10
13.5%
๐
2
2.70%
๐ฏ
2
2.70%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 74reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 19 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
๐จ HUGE COLLAB ALERT ๐จ
โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโโ โ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธโ๏ธ
๐ฃ We're excited to announce a Collaboration with Jano Fx ๐ฃ
๐จโ๐ป Host: Yeneta Fx | Owner - Kaleb (@Belak27) โ
๐ถ Partner: Jano Fx | @Janofxtrading โ
โพ This Collaboration will bring You:
1. Crypto vs Trading
2. High Probability Swing Trades
3. Trading Psychology
4. Technical Analysis and also Special Live Event
๐ Date - Mark your Calendars - Sunday, March 23rd ๐
โ Show Yโฆ
๐ช The art of scaling in... this is just paper trade but a good trade management example.. you can look where i took partials and i scaled in.. just for educational purpose
There's no way someone is trading like this. The current futures price action looks like a QR code ๐. If you think it's clean, I don't know what to say to you... Just wait or choose other pairs. Just because you're used to trading futures doesn't mean you have to stick with them every session. Think professionally and shift your focus to other good opportunities.
I wasnโt really active after mid-December since I was focused on other things outside of trading. The market conditions havenโt been great, especially on futures, and the majors have been less volatile. Based on experience, January and early February are usually slow, but after mid-February, we might start seeing clearer price action and major expansions.
Iโm not saying to completely avoid trading, but just manage eโฆ
I hope youโve traded enough to get what Iโm saying rushing things only makes it take longer because you end up starting over again and again. Being patient is actually the fastest way to reach your goals since you only need to do it right once. In trading, thatโs everything.
I wish Iโd understood this earlier: focus on small milestones, compound them, and youโll hit your big goals. But remember, losses and failuresโฆ
๐6๐1
Signed Janoict
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @janofxpodcast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollโs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only โ there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionโs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionโs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 25 December 2024 to 19 March 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind โ an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results โ and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 634,598 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โJanofx Podcast ๐โ (@janofxpodcast), 65 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janofxpodcast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
