Channel
@jannilix_live
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
58subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002582042637 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jannilix_live |
| Description | Что-то про мои будни, что-то про работу. Возможно, даже будет что-то полезное. Много моего кота, всем добро пожаловать ~ 🤍 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jannilix_live |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 58 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:02 | 58 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 8 (2 August 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 455 |
| Reactions total | 151 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 06:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
151 reactions across 8 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5242725733364684402 | 50 | 33.1% | |
| ❤ | 35 | 23.2% | |
| custom 5222301892561877584 | 20 | 13.2% | |
| custom 5258251490383915967 | 16 | 10.6% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 7.28% | |
| custom 5291913038868280241 | 9 | 5.96% | |
| 🔥 | 7 | 4.64% | |
| 🤝 | 2 | 1.32% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 0.662% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 151reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🧸✨☎🎀🐣 увидела в моменте свободную Любочку на фотозоне и Хенджина, медлить было нельзя. хоть как-то запечатлела образ ! а то мы делаем фотозоны, а потом сами на них не фоткаемся 🤩 Феликс в этот момент диджеил, к сожалению
🔥7custom 52427257333646844023custom 52582514903839159671
🌟 🤩 первые мысли / заметки / впечатления после прослушивания альбома. просто хочется куда-то эти эмоции выплеснуть Run it — богиня. ⭐️ This&That — посидели мы с ней 2 часа, знакомились. в итоге скажу, что да, понравилась ! она очень забавная, наполнена любимыми рандомными электро звуками 3рачи. структурно разнообразно. есть ультимативная партия Хана в начале. время покажет, но вряд ли она станет моей любимой заглав…
❤7custom 52427257333646844026
во-первых ! спасибо за всё это, от души ! во-вторых ! ну пацаны, ну намешали новых звуков, что аж там люди без голов танцуют хихикаю с капучино американо 😎 🤩 ран ит, конечно, так завысила мне планку, что сейчас переслушиваю 5 раз заглавку, чтобы понять свое отношение, чувствую себя лохом чуть-чуть 🌟🌟 https://youtu.be/BZ4UzthYTss?si=my7KStrHOI-tvfWc
custom 52223018925618775846custom 52919130388682802414🤝2
🌟🌟 любимая часть дороги до дома , в конце вылетит птичка
custom 524272573336468440212custom 52919130388682802415
все еще не жалею о своем решении 80 дней назад купить его баббл
🤣11custom 52223018925618775846custom 52582514903839159675🙏1
период экранов вновь наступает 🤩
❤12custom 52427257333646844026
🤩🤩🤩 одна из главных мотиваций таких пати для меня — вдоволь напрыгаться и наораться на обожаемых длс и раннерс !!!! еще, кажется, я оттанцевала за вечер свой возможный гайморит, тк заложенность стала слабее на следующий день, прикол ( со второй песней видео нет, я там слишком запрыгалась и забыла подснять хехе )
custom 524272573336468440215custom 52223018925618775847custom 52582514903839159673
скз вечеринка — ВСЕ ! до сих пор мне до конца не приходит осознание, что мы провели пати. почти каждый день на протяжении 2-3 месяцев мысли, рассуждения, волнения о ней не отпускали мою голову, возможно, именно из-за этого я 3 неделю вылечиться не могу 🌟🤩 очевидно, что в этом году у меня появилось больше организационных задач, больше ответственности. а все новое меня пугает, поэтому моментами было очень стрессово. …
❤16custom 52427257333646844028custom 52582514903839159677custom 52223018925618775841
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @jannilix_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 836,047 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лошачий коток Жени и Феликса🐈” (@jannilix_live), 58 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jannilix_live.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.