Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ДЖАНГО

Channel

ДЖАНГО

@jango07_71

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,570subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001201939030
TypeChannel
Username@jango07_71
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jango07_71

Growth

1,5701,5721,5717 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,571 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,572 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,570 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,570–1,572 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 15:561,570-2
14 Aug 2026, 11:451,572+1
11 Aug 2026, 03:211,571-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:181,572no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:251,572first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.30%
avg views ÷ 1,570 subscribers
Avg views / post
130
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.65%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 10 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 July 20265 August 2026)
Views total1,303
Reactions total32
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 21:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 10s
Average length
27s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

52 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2140.4%
🔥1426.9%
🤣1325.0%
👍23.85%
🤡23.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 52reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
8
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @jango07_71. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Делаю вид что тренируюсь

🤣2🔥1

3 Aug 2026, 07:51 UTC106 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Главное в нашей индустрии всегда поддерживать друг друга)) Особенно мои сумки.😁 И я его не эксплуатирую. Я просто верю в его физический потенциал)

🔥2

2 Aug 2026, 09:24 UTC97 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fightnightsofficialVideo

🗣«Джанго, главное, не задохнись после первого раунда!» Вадим Ролич отреагировал на слова Ислама Жангоразова. Тяжи сразятся на турнире БЕТСИТИ FIGHT NIGHTS 140, который пройдёт 27 августа в Минске 🇧🇾 🎫 БИЛЕТЫ: https://www.ticketpro.by/kupit-bilet/48953/

1 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC104 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Чуть подвигались⚔️🤼🥊 От души за помощь

🔥2

29 Jul 2026, 09:35 UTC160 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я вообще считаю это оскорблением со стороны Файт Найт дать мне не понятно кого. Он походу должен был нести мои сумки в гостинице. Но перепутали поставить моим соперником

🤡2🤣2

29 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC146 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fightnightsofficialPhoto

Джанго выступит в Минске 👊 Соперником Ислама Жангоразова (3-0) станет белорусский боец Вадим Ролич (8-3) 🇧🇾 БЕТСИТИ FIGHT NIGHTS 140 27 августа | Минск 🎫 БИЛЕТЫ: https://www.ticketpro.by/kupit-bilet/48953/

🔥31👍1

27 Jul 2026, 11:57 UTC134 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @fightnightsofficialPhoto

БЕТСИТИ FIGHT NIGHTS возвращается в Минск‼️ 🤜 ГЛАВНЫЙ БОЙ ВЕЧЕРА: 🇷🇺 Абдулмуталип Гайирбегов vs Артём Бачун 🇧🇾 — полуфинал гран-при в полулёгком весе 🏆 Представитель школы Александра Шлеменко, дисциплинированный и опасный Абдулмуталип Гайирбегов приедет в Минск, чтобы остановить одного из сильнейших белорусских бойцов Артёма Бачуна. Кто из них продолжит путь за миллионом? 🤜 СОГЛАВНОЕ СОБЫТИЕ: Максим Буторин vs Зал

2

21 Jul 2026, 18:40 UTC186 views10 reactions8 Starsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Любого грэплера дайте сюда! Готов принять схватку с любым. Все кто выше белого пояса и больше двух месяцев ходит, не писать, не предлагать! Буду блокировать!😎

🤣73

20 Jul 2026, 15:13 UTC184 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

1

18 Jul 2026, 20:56 UTC206 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Так на минуточку напомню)) в худшей форме, с миллионами травм с которыми 99% снимаются с боев Кто-то говорит кто может справиться, а уже справлялись

7

16 Jul 2026, 07:43 UTC220 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Че, кто за кого там был вчера?

3

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @jango07_71. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ДЖАНГО” (@jango07_71), 1,570 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jango07_71.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.