Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jane’s soft life ☁️

Channel

Jane’s soft life ☁️

@janesoftlife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

338subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003640204108
TypeChannel
Username@janesoftlife
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/janesoftlife

Growth

3387 Aug 2026, 08:46 — 338 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 07:03 — 338 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 08:468 Aug 2026, 07:03
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 337–339 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 07:03338no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:46338first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 2 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
97.8%
avg views ÷ 338 subscribers
Avg views / post
331
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held9 (2 August 20265 August 2026)
Views total2,975
Reactions total206
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
569
Videos
68
Links
20

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 11s
Average length
36s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

206 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54224614474582714536431.1%
custom 52559475711420747175526.7%
custom 52512994372752590945426.2%
custom 53931101434685814652411.7%
custom 519064442306248228173.40%
custom 539539245902490423220.971%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 206reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC149 views39 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Я сегодня молодец! Забрала свои водительские права, выпила матчу в новом месте, сделала маникюр и педикюр, в процессе почитала книжку. Осталось только родить 😄

custom 525594757114207471720custom 542246144745827145310custom 52512994372752590947custom 53931101434685814652

5 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC175 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Идеальное изобретение для беременных на 38 неделе, я там как юла весь фильм крутилась с бока на бок. Ну и вообще развалиться на таком сидении кайф!

custom 52512994372752590944custom 53931101434685814653custom 52559475711420747172

5 Aug 2026, 08:59 UTC174 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52559475711420747174

5 Aug 2026, 08:57 UTC≈1,060 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Новый человек паук вызвал неоднозначные ощущения, как будто мы посмотрели очень долгую подводку к следующей части или филлерную серию. В целом, не плохо. Много именно внутренних переживаний Питера, по-прежнему крутая картинка и динамика. Но как сказал Серега «я вышел и уже забыл что было в фильме». Мы ходим на такое ради того чтобы поесть начос с сырным соусом и просто сменить обстановку, цель выполнена. Малышка в

custom 53931101434685814657custom 52559475711420747174custom 51906444230624822813

4 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC193 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 52559475711420747176custom 54224614474582714533custom 53931101434685814652

4 Aug 2026, 14:58 UTC199 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Погода в Белграде прямо говорит мне досиживать последние недели беременности дома, а я и не сопротивляюсь. Чувствую себя лучше, но сил и энергии все ещё мало, есть внутреннее желание в целом максимально беречь силы и себя. Удивительно мы устроены, все так естественно происходит. А я думала, что буду скакать вплоть до дня родов.

custom 525594757114207471710custom 54224614474582714537custom 53931101434685814656custom 51906444230624822814

2 Aug 2026, 13:56 UTC336 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Только вчера начала, а она уже бьет рекорды по количеству выделенных отрывков и мыслей. Всем, кто хотя бы раз задумывался о материнстве, о своих отношениях с мамой, о своей женской роли в целом. Мамам и беременным думаю вообще очень откликнется. #книги@janesoftlife

custom 52559475711420747179custom 54224614474582714537custom 53931101434685814654custom 53953924590249042322

2 Aug 2026, 12:54 UTC343 views50 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Когда я проснулась, увидела сообщение от своего врача, что мне лучше остаться дома в кровати, спать и сбивать температуру, терапию я сегодня уже получила. А в 7 утра сразу приехать к ней на полный осмотр и можно будет продолжить лечение в дневном стационаре на базе моего роддома. Мне это больше откликалось, потому что пытаться лечь в государственную больницу, где меня будут лечить непонятно кто и непонятно чем, я не

custom 542246144745827145337custom 525129943727525909413

2 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC346 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

37-я неделя оказалась самой тяжелой за всю беременность В ночь с воскресенья на понедельник у меня начались адские боли в пояснице, больно было так, что начало тошнить. Я не могла найти удобное положение хоть на секунду и вздремнуть. Утром мы поехали в роддом по совету моего врача. Честно говоря, были почти уверены, что это роды, поэтому я старалась отшучиваться через боль и не концентрироваться на ней. Берегла силы

custom 525129943727525909430

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @janesoftlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 137,671 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jane’s soft life ☁️” (@janesoftlife), 338 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/janesoftlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.