Channel
@jamierahan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,341subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001719517309 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jamierahan |
| Created | 2 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jamierahan |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 2,341 | -2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 2,343 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 2,345 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:23 | 2,346 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:31 | 2,347 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 2,347 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 14 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
278 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 123 | 44.2% | |
| 🙏 | 40 | 14.4% | |
| 💯 | 34 | 12.2% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 5.76% | |
| 🔥 | 14 | 5.04% | |
| 👍 | 13 | 4.68% | |
| 🤣 | 11 | 3.96% | |
| 👏 | 5 | 1.80% | |
| 🥰 | 4 | 1.44% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 🤨 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 🤮 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 🤯 | 3 | 1.08% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.719% | |
| 🐳 | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 🤗 | 1 | 0.36% | |
| 🫡 | 1 | 0.36% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 278reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 April 2026 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I don't have time to write huge posts now with super complicated explanations so here's a quick one on 'flame body' and flame charge. This is extremely important. Flame body has a CHARGE. The veca system flamebody level 1-2 is 45 charge The ecka system flamebody level 2-3 is 90 charge (when you have lotum activation and twin flame ecka Adondraea flame charge/merger) The higher systems of the Adondra 360 eckasha A…
❤20🙏8🤯3🔥1
Part 2. Read part one above They do this by getting your flame body charge enough to pierce the veca NETS via rishiac flame body but then they skip over the 90/180/360 charges to take you out or assimilate your template at the ecka level connecting into the eckasha via LeAdorA polarian gate interface breaches (hyperspace leap hacks) Seriously if you're not sure.....don't listen to me or anyone. Just go through the …
🙏30❤24🔥9👍2❤🔥1👏1🫡1
This is the silverseed and WhA YA yas mirror ball mimic transharmonic time wave fields mirroring your TilE a sphere crystal body (Wha YA yas eckasha mirrors CosmMAya/Cosminyas plug extensions octophim tentacles into the Beast) as a copy and paste digital clone which they can keep replicating used to massively enhance the shadow body as the D2 'voice' inside your head through the Nadis lines and nadial sac replaced wi…
👍5💯4🤮3
https://youtu.be/sWcDUT3zMjM?si=2KUDaVnV-xmgj-nN Final message to the jelly agents lol
🤣11🏆2
And here's the proof that she deleted the comment. That should be the end of this awful saga now. If you're not willing to back up what you say when someone challenges you; especially when you consistently provoke others, you're hiding something. Stand up to the bully with integrity and they crumble. Now I can be at peace and put my time into training people at Paxos.
❤🔥15❤6👏2🙏2💯1😁1
Nobody victimized you. Show us the proof. There is none. I know the other people involved and they all handled these spats with integrity, dignity and grace. We don't get involved or escalate any petty conflicts unless there is a significant threat to the Emerald Covenant and now is the time to alert you to that threat so YOU CAN MAKE AN INFORMED decision seeing both sides to choose. We deal with FACTS.
💯8❤5
You strategically called out the latter alhumbhra teachings to make out that you weren't involved in the jelly groups But that actually started in 2008 and you recently made a video saying that it's ok to explore the 2009 material which is the year the false Ah SA yas silverseed and WhA YA yas mirror ball mimic transharmonic time wave fields blend with your tailbone and to Aurora Earth and the DhA ya Tei planes. Y…
❤9💯2
This website was created by James which you promoted in KS groups and you were called out for it trying to groom more people into his 'choir'
💯4❤2
You were involved in the DhA ya Tei net breach (catheion synapse braiding agenda) with James to invert people's templates handing them over to the octophim
❤2💯2🔥1
Your rage got to such crazy heights with James that you assembled a team to try and gather a data log file of any posts that would indicate I was an agent. All you found was a poem I wrote (which is actually posted in this group) and you made it out like I was talking about you lol. You were so desperate you had to put it out 3 seperate times because that's all you had. You sided with James' attack on Ma'a, the sp…
💯4
You were blocked in my channel because I knew you were grooming people to teach them CosMAyah AI reversals (the sea of ah ya purple rain) which is reverse rama rain. If people were around then, the subs here can attest that I put up a warning about it. You were the only one to thumb it down so you were removed out and I never mentioned you again. Half the reason I took off commenting in the group was half because o…
❤8
In the one and a half years you've been attempting to troll me online I haven't reacted at all up until now. Now that I have recently invited you to have a Youtube LIVE discussion, you have taken down your YT videos of me calling me a Thothian agent. Is this a coincidence? Please ask Nikki this: What teachings or messages have I ever shared that are Thothian? (Crickets)
❤11👀3💯2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @jamierahan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,268,810 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Rahan Spirituality” (@jamierahan), 2,341 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jamierahan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.