Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Jamal Ghamari

Channel

Jamal Ghamari

@jamalghamari

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,131subscribers

-26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001000135076
TypeChannel
Username@jamalghamari
CreatedBetween 1 September 2015 and 31 December 2015— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/jamalghamari

Growth

4,1314,1614,1466 August 2026 — 4,157 subscribers6 August 2026 — 4,157 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,161 subscribers9 August 2026 — 4,154 subscribers12 August 2026 — 4,145 subscribers16 August 2026 — 4,144 subscribers22 August 2026 — 4,141 subscribers25 August 2026 — 4,140 subscribers28 August 2026 — 4,131 subscribers6 August 202628 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 22 days, net -26. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,127–4,166 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Aug 2026, 21:054,131-9
25 Aug 2026, 16:234,140-1
22 Aug 2026, 12:224,141-3
16 Aug 2026, 04:144,144-1
12 Aug 2026, 21:534,145-9
9 Aug 2026, 18:154,154-7
7 Aug 2026, 05:004,161+4
6 Aug 2026, 15:014,157no change
6 Aug 2026, 14:594,157first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 5 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.01%
avg views ÷ 4,131 subscribers
Avg views / post
331
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 22 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held22 (29 July 20268 August 2026)
Views total6,287
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

129 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5845.0%
👍4635.7%
1410.9%
🤩75.43%
🏆21.55%
🕊21.55%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 129reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC1 viewsread 8 August 2026

«یک دلیل اصلی خرید نکردن مشتری اینه که توی صحبت باهاش عمیق نمیشی» یعنی چی؟👇

8 Aug 2026, 12:14 UTC9 viewsread 8 August 2026

⚠️❌خطر❌⚠️ این موضوع به صورت جدّی فروش و کسب‌وکارت رو تهدید می‌کنه 👇👇👇

5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC262 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🆕در عوض، برو سراغ رویکرد فروش مبتنی بر دیالوگ (گفت‌وگو)؛ یعنی از همون ابتدا فروش رو در قالب گفت‌وگو و سوال و جواب پیش ببر. ‼️اگه دیدی چند دقیقه‌ست که داری برای مشتری پرزنت می‌کنی، بدون که شانسی نداری و هرچه‌سریعتر باید مسیر رو عوض کنی.

6

5 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC263 viewsread 8 August 2026

❌در دوران کنونی، چنین روشی به شدت ناکارآمده. ‏

5 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC255 viewsread 8 August 2026

😵 فروشنده شروع می‌کرده و دقایقی درباره‌ی شرکت و محصول و ویژگی‌ها و … صحبت می‌کرده و در واقع پرزنت می‌کرده؛ 🔹مشتری هم گوش می‌داده و خیلی وقت‌ها خرید هم می‌کرده.

5 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC252 viewsread 8 August 2026

☠️این روش در دهه 1920 میلادی ابداع شده بوده و در اون زمان کار می‌کرده 👇

5 Aug 2026, 11:51 UTC252 viewsread 8 August 2026

📠 روش منقرض‌شده فروش: ❌پرزنت کردن❌ 👇👇👇

1 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC459 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

✅برگزار شد. کارگاه آموزشی فروش حرفه‌ای در کمپانی دنون (Danone) ⭕به اعتقاد شرکت‌کنندگان بخش پاسخ‌های حرفه‌ای به اعتراضات مشتری جذاب‌ترین بخش کارگاه بوده است.

1 Aug 2026, 13:22 UTC450 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026

✨فرق کسی که این ترفند‌ها رو بلده با کسی که بلد نیست … خیلی زیاده از زمین تا آسمونه❗️

6👍3🤩3

1 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC426 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🔹یعنی به جای این که ما به مشتری بگیم چرا باید از ما خرید کنه، کاری می‌کنیم که خود مشتری به این نتیجه برسه🎯

3👍3🏆21

1 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC383 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

🎩این رو بهش میگیم ترفند القــــا 🧠

32👍1

1 Aug 2026, 13:15 UTC384 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

پس چی باید گفت؟🤔 من توی این شرایط از این جملات استفاده می‌کنم: 🔹درسته، خود من می‌تونم چند جا رو که ارزون‌تر میدن بفرستم براتون؛ فقط قبلش یه سوال کوچیک بپرسم، به نظرتون چرا x نفر از ما گرفتن با این که جاهای دیگه ارزون‌تر هستن؟

3👍2🤩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @jamalghamari. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

1 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

🚨وقتی مشتری میگه: رقیب‌تون ارزون‌تر میده. میدونی چی باید جواب بدی؟

  1. 🔺میدونم24%
  2. 🔺میخوام بدونم76%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

30 Jul 2026, 08:31 UTCAnonymous Poll59 voters

⚠️برات پیش اومده که کلی با مشتری حرف زدی، اما مشتری برای خرید تردید داره و نمی‌تونه تصمیم بگیره؟🤔

  1. آره پیش اومده81%
  2. خیلی پیش میاد19%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

دکتر کاویانی - منتور بیزینس آنلاین
@drkv_online · 41,843
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 29 August 2026
دکتر شیری
@drshiri · 98,715
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
🌱فن بیان؛مذاکره،ارتباطات🌱
@businesstrick · 63,966
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Jamal Ghamari” (@jamalghamari), 4,131 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jamalghamari.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.