Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
12,700 average views per post against 16,611 subscribers — an engagement rate of 76.5%. Across the 7,908 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,001–31,622 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 3.71% and 17.2%, with a median of 8.72%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (18 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Posts measured
22 of 22 published in the window (1 exact, 21 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
279,414
Mature posts only
79.6% over 21 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 17 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 11 days, net +162. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,407–16,642 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 11:58
16,596
-15
16 Aug 2026, 04:16
16,611
-4
14 Aug 2026, 14:59
16,615
+13
13 Aug 2026, 06:58
16,602
+34
12 Aug 2026, 07:12
16,568
+9
11 Aug 2026, 04:55
16,559
+7
10 Aug 2026, 05:16
16,552
+18
9 Aug 2026, 03:54
16,534
+15
8 Aug 2026, 03:53
16,519
+56
7 Aug 2026, 00:25
16,463
+29
6 Aug 2026, 12:15
16,434
first reading
Engagement
34 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
53.4%
avg views ÷ 16,596 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,870
34 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.522%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
34
of 34 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026
Posts held
34 (26 July 2026 – 17 August 2026)
Views total
301,542
Reactions total
1,575
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
17 Aug 2026, 17:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,070
Videos
≈355
Links
≈4,160
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 17 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
11s
Average length
6s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,575 reactions across 34 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
618
39.2%
🫡
547
34.7%
👍
206
13.1%
🎉
85
5.40%
👌
52
3.30%
🔥
29
1.84%
👏
28
1.78%
💯
10
0.635%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,575reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💊در مورد قرصهای تمرکز و داروها هم لطفاً خیلی جدی باشید.
❌ریتالین، داروهای محرک، مکملها یا حتی دارویی مثل پروپرانولول (که فکرمیکنین چیز خاصی نیست!) رو صرفاً به توصیهی دوست، فامیل یا تجربهی یک نفر دیگه مصرف نکنید.
🚫اگر دارویی برای شما تجویز شده، فقط طبق دستور پزشک خودتون مصرفش کنید. روزهای آخر کنکور جای آزمونوخطای دارویی نیست.
☕قهوه و کافئین هم داستان خودش رو داره.
🔴اگر همیشه قهوه میخوردید، مقدارش رو ناگهان زیاد نکنید.
🔴اگر اصلاً عادت نداشتید، الان زمان شروع کردن نیست.
کافئین زیاد، مخصوصاً وقتی مضطربید، میتونه باعث تپش قلب، لرزش، بیقراری، افزایش اضطراب و اختلال خواب بشه.
⚡و نوشیدنی انرژیزا هم قرار نیست ناجی کنکورتون باشه!
ممکنه بهجای انرژی بیشتر، خواب و ضربان قلبتون رو بههم بریزه؛ مخصوصاً اگر قبلاً مصرفش نکرده باشید.
⬅️جواب ما برای همهشون تقریباً یکیه:
توی این چند روز، هیچ چیز جدیدی رو امتحان نکنید!!!
🟢غذای ساده، تازه، خانگی و آشنا.
وعدههاتون رو حذف نکنید و سعی کنید غذاهاتون متعادل باشه؛ یعنی در طول روز از منابع مناسب کربوهیدرات، پروتئین، سبزیجات و چربیهای مفید استفاده کنید.
🍬حتی با خوراکیهای خیلی شیرین هم زیادهروی نکنید. اینکه فکر کنیم «قند بخورم مغزم سریعتر کار میکنه» میتونه باعث بالا و پایین شدن انرژی و احساس خستگی …
⬅️بدن شما ماههاست به یک ریتم مشخص خواب، غذا خوردن و حتی میزان کافئینی که دریافت میکنه عادت کرده
❌الان واقعاً زمان این نیست که یکدفعه همهچیز رو تغییر بدیم و انتظار داشته باشیم بدنمون هم کاملاً باهامون همراهی کنه.
🚫از طرفی استرس خودش میتونه روی دستگاه گوارش اثر بذاره. مغز و روده ارتباط خیلی نزدیکی با هم دارن و وقتی تحت فشار و اضطرابید، چیزهایی مثل دلدرد، تهوع، نفخ، تغییر اشتها یا بههمریختگی گوارشی اصلاً عجیب …
🍎این چند روز با بدنتون رفیق باشید!
چرا میگم؟
چون این روزها یه عالمه سؤال ازتون میگیریم:
☕ «قهوه بخورم که بیشتر بیدار بمونم؟»
⚡ «نوشابه انرژیزا بخورم؟»
💊 «قرص تمرکز استفاده کنم؟»
🍗 «غذای خاصی هست که مغزم رو قویتر کنه؟»
⬅️شب قبل و صبح کنکور
شب قبل و صبح کنکور قرار نیست چیزی رو عوض کنی؛ فقط باید شرایطی بسازی که بهترین عملکردت رو داشته باشی.
🔑«شب قبل کنکور، وقتِ درس خوندن نیست؛ وقتِ آماده شدن برای بهترین عملکردته.»
⬅️مدیریت استرس و اتفاقات غیرمنتظره سر جلسه
کنکور همیشه دقیقاً طبق چیزی که انتظار داری پیش نمیره؛ مهم اینه که با اولین اتفاق غیرمنتظره، کنترل خودت رو از دست ندی.
🔑«ممکنه همهچیز طبق برنامه پیش نره؛ اما تو میتونی توی لحظه بهترین تصمیم رو بگیری.»
یاسمن قاسمی | مشاور ارشد گروه جهشینو
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
⬇️پشتیبانی رزرو مشاوره⬇️
@jaheshinomoshavere
🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴🔴
🔅کانال آموزشی جهشینو
🔅گروه پرسش و پاسخ جهشینو
⬅️این چند روز آخر دقیقاً چی بخونیم؟
این روزها وقتِ یادگیریِ حجم زیادی از مطالب جدید نیست؛ وقتِ جمعبندی هوشمندانه و تثبیت چیزیه که بلدی.
🔑 «الان قرار نیست بیشتر بخونی؛
قرارِ بهتر استفاده کنی.»
⬅️اشتباهات ممنوعهی روزهای آخر
بعضی اشتباهها توی این چند روز، بیشتر از کم درس خوندن بهت آسیب میزنن؛ حواست بهشون باشه.
🔑«روزهای آخر، بیشتر از اینکه جای جبران باشند، جای خراب نکردناند.»
⬅️حس میکنم همهچی یادم رفته!
این حس توی روزهای آخر کاملاً طبیعیه؛ اما چیزی که فکر میکنی فراموش کردی، لزوماً واقعاً فراموش نشده.
🔑«احساسِ فراموشی، همیشه به معنی فراموش کردن نیست.»
🔔بچهها،
دیگه رسیدیم به پایان داستان کنکور۱۴۰۵..
رسیدیم به روزهایی که دیگه هر تصمیم کوچیک میتونه روی نتیجهتون اثر بذاره!😉
این روزهای پایانی،
❌زمانِ آزمونوخطا،
❌تغییر ناگهانی برنامه
❌مقایسه کردن خودتون با بقیه
❌یا درس خوندنِ بیهدف نیست؛
😄اتفاقاً الان بیشتر از همیشه باید حواستون به رفتار، عملکرد، خواب، مطالعه، تستزدن و حتی مدیریت استرستون باشه.
◀️برای همین چند تا وویس مهم براتون آماده کردیم که مخصوص همین روزها…
❤9🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @jaheshino. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
اول یه خسته نباشید بگیم بهتون بابت تموم شدن امتحانا🤗🧡
بچه های ریاضی هم بگین ببینم هندسه امروزو چیکار کردین؟
خیلی سخت بود 😣13%
هم سوال راحت داشت هم سوال سخت، چند نمره غلط دارم🫠9%
در سطح امتحانات سال های قبل بود👌9%
راحت بود من کامل میشم🤩16%
امتحان نداشتم60%
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
صبحتون بخیر بچه ها خسته امتحان نباشین💝
چه کردین با شیمی امروز؟🤭
عالی ۲۰ ام🥰10%
۱۹ به بالا💪18%
۱۸ به بالا😇20%
۱۷ به بالا😶🌫️17%
۱۶ به پایین🥲19%
امتحان نداشتم25%
The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
خسته نباشید رفقا❤️
بیستِ هویت رو امروز گرفتین یا چی؟😎
اره راحت بود ۲۰ میشم😇20%
سخت نبود ولی یکم نمره کم اوردم 😬42%
مثل نمونه سوال های سال های قبل بود🥳8%
خوب ندادم🥲13%
امتحان نداشتم23%
The shares total 106%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 243,220 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مدرسه آنلاین آلفا @alphaedu · 134,374 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
پارسا فراهانی شیمی(تنها کانال اصلی استاد) @farahani_shimi · 180,234 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
معین کرمی|ریاضی کنکور @math_karami · 281,190 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 10 August 2026
آریو کنکور | رسانه دانش آموزی @Aryo_Konkur · 259,494 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 August 2026
موسسه آموزشی انتخاب @entekhablink_edu · 109,406 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 14 August 2026
ادبیات فارسی با دکتر علیرضا جعفری @adabiat_drjaafari · 131,907 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Jaheshino | جهشینو” (@jaheshino), 16,596 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jaheshino.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
