Channel
@jahan_news2
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,056subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001461019676 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @jahan_news2 |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/jahan_news2 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:21 | 2,056 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 14:37 | 2,061 | -4 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 2,065 | -3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 2,068 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 00:26 | 2,071 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 2,072 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 2,074 | -6 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 2,080 | -3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:57 | 2,083 | -3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 2,086 | -6 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:57 | 2,092 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 14:51 | 2,093 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:56 | 2,096 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 2,098 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:49 | 2,098 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
5 reactions across 2 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 3 | 60.0% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 20.0% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 20.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نشریه FT : یکی از دلایل اصلی عربستان برای رفتن به سمت این ائتلاف، حملات حوثیهاست ریاض نگران حملات حوثیها به کشتیها تو دریای سرخ و تهدید مسیرهای مهم کشتیرانیه به همین خاطر عربستان میخواد با ترکیه و پاکستان همکاری نظامی و اطلاعاتی نزدیکتری داشته باشه تا جلوی گسترش تهدید حوثیها رو بگیره این سه کشور قصد دارن اطلاعات امنیتی رو با هم به اشتراک بذارند رزمایشهای مشترک برگزار کنن و برای حفاظت از دریای سرخ و باب…
پیت هگسث، وزیر جنگ آمریکا دقایقی پیش در حساب رسمی خود در ایکس متنی را منتشر کرد که عنوان آن “ترامپ جنگ ایران را برد” می باشد. 🌐 @siyasimohem
قشقاوی، سخنگوی کمیسیون امنیت مجلس: چارچوب کلی تفاهم ایران با عمان درباره تنگه هرمز مورد توافق قرار گرفته.بعد از اعلام نظر نهایی در سطوح بالاتر، بیانیه مشترک و جزئیات این تفاهم منتشر میشه 🌐 @siyasimohem
عربستان سعودی، ترکیه و پاکستان «توافقنامه دفاع مشترک مکه» را امضا کردند. توافقنامه دفاع مشترک مکه: هر گونه حملهٔ مسلحانه به هر یک از کشورها، حمله به هر سه کشور محسوب میشود. هدف این توافقنامه، تقویت بازدارندگی جمعی در برابر هر گونه اقدام تجاوزکارانه است. 🌐 @siyasimohem
😁2🤬1
توافقنامه دفاعی سه جانبه جدید بین ترکیه، عربستان سعودی و پاکستان که امروز امضا خواهد شد، رسماً با نام "توافقنامه مکه" نامگذاری شده است 🌐 @siyasimohem
👏1😁1
شبکه ۱۴ اسرائیل: ارزیابی در اسرائیل این است که ترامپ در مسیر توافق با ایران قرار دارد 🔹 شبکه ۱۴ اسرائیل به نقل از سرهنگ (ذخیره) اوزی دیان اعلام کرد: اسرائیل باید آزادی عمل خود را حفظ کند. وی افزود: ما چارهای جز مطیع کردن ایرانیان به دست خود نداریم و ایالات متحده به دنبال این کار نیست، بلکه به دنبال توافق است 🌐 @siyasimohem
🔴گزارشها از حمله جدید یمن به مزدوران سعودی در مأرب 🔹برخی منابع یمنی از حمله ارتش یمن به مزدوران سعودی در داخل پادگان نظامی «صحن الجن» در مأرب یمن خبر می دهند. 🌐 @siyasimohem
ویدیویی از اولین لحظه بمباران بیت رهبری که به تازگی منتشر شده 🌐 @siyasimohem
🇺🇸 ترامپ : ممکنه خیلی زود با ایران به توافق برسیم! فکر میکنم جنگ خیلی زود تموم میشه. به نظرم ایران دیگه نمیتونه مدت زیادی به این وضعیت ادامه بده. الان میشه گفت تنگه یه جورایی بازه، کنترل تنگه دست ماست. خودم مستقیماً تو مذاکرات با ایران دخیلم. اوضاع داره خوب پیش میره. ما واقعاً حجم زیادی مهمات داریم. زلنسکی گفته اوکراین شديداً به سامانههای موشکی پاتریوت نیاز داره؟ خب خود ما هم نیاز داریم. 🌐 @siyasimohem
﷽ ✨ اَللّهُمَّصَلِّعَلیمُحَمَّدٍوَآلِمُحَمَّدٍ وَعَجِّلْفرجهمَ ✨ 🌱🌸سلام صبح بخیر 🌸🌱 ✨جمعه✨ 💫 ۱۶ مرداد ۱۴۰۵ 💫 ۲۳ صفر ۱۴۴۸ 💫 ۷ اوت ۲۰۲۶
ترامپ: ایران همچنان میتواند در تنگه هرمز شلیک کند رئیسجمهور آمریکا: 🔹 ایران همیشه قادر است چیزی شلیک کند یا یک مین در این آبراه کار بگذارد. 🔹 هیچکس نمیخواهد کشتیهایی به ارزش میلیاردها دلار را به خطر بیندازد و در معرض برخورد تصادفی با یک مین در تنگه هرمز قرار بگیرد./تسنیم 🌐 @siyasimohem
رسانه آمریکایی MS NOW: عمان با چارچوب یک توافق موقت با ایران برای بازگشایی تنگه هرمز موافقت کرده است. هدف از این توافق، فراهم کردن زمینه برای برقراری آتشبس جدید و ازسرگیری مذاکرات هستهای میان آمریکا و ایران عنوان شده است. 🌐 @siyasimohem
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @jahan_news2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“اخبار جنگ/ جهان نیوز🌐” (@jahan_news2), 2,056 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/jahan_news2.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.