Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Смыслы + тексты = 💰💰 | Спиридонова Юлия

Channel

Смыслы + тексты = 💰💰 | Спиридонова Юлия

@j_a_spir

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

762subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001629500690
TypeChannel
Username@j_a_spir
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/j_a_spir

Growth

7627647637 August 2026 — 764 subscribers7 August 2026 — 764 subscribers15 August 2026 — 763 subscribers22 August 2026 — 762 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 762–764 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 22:19762-1
15 Aug 2026, 02:18763-1
7 Aug 2026, 11:02764no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:58764first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.74%
avg views ÷ 762 subscribers
Avg views / post
59.0
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 August 20266 August 2026)
Views total1,179
Reactions total159
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

159 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7144.7%
👍4025.2%
1911.9%
👏74.40%
🫡63.77%
53.14%
💯53.14%
🏆42.52%
😁21.26%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC31 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

А я между тем как раз таки рекомендую всем поработать с Юлией. Скорее всего я тот самый эксперт (хотелось бы верить 🤣) и я в работе с Юлей: 1) узнал с десяток новых способов собирать контент для себя бесконечно 2) понял где косячу на клиентском пути и что мне надо изменить 3) понял чего мне не хватало для выстраивания контента 4) просто кайфанул от работы с Юлией и новых знаний, которые я получил В эти выходные

🔥5🏆431

6 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC31 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👆🏻👆🏻Ооооойййй 🤗 Большой, очень большой Профессионал своего дела Роман Казаков, Заведующий по продукту.

3🔥3👏2

6 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

За 60 минут с высококлассным экспертом: 1. Докрутили пост-закреп в Телеграм 2. Прописали цепочку постов для продажи мини-продукта 3. Зафиксировали приемы для вовлечения аудитории Раньше на это уходило 2 часа. Расту, однако 😎 ________ 📌 Кто хочет и готов вложиться в свой канал и выйти с продажами, напишите мне, у меня для вас 🔥 предложение. Даже не буду здесь про это рассказывать. 😉 @yulia_s13 .

👍3🫡3👏2

6 Aug 2026, 12:08 UTC31 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📌 Запись эфира с юристом для нутрициологов и специалистов по питанию и здоровому образу жизни. ✅ Какие вопросы разобрали: Как с 1 сентября 2025 называться нутрициологу Что нельзя делать НЕмедицинским работникам Договор-оферта - почему нельзя использовать шаблон Индивидуальный договор - чем отличается от оферты Про персональные данные Реклама или информирование (в блоге, на сайте), как говорить про результаты, оформ

👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 10:22 UTC30 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Также в группе "Эфиры для экспертов" подсказки и шпаргалки от юриста: - безопасная формулировка для оферты специалиста по питанию - что должно быть в договоре нутрициолога - самые рискованные рекламные формулировки для нутрициолога - новые правила регистрации доменов (для экспертов всех ниш) И специальные условия на оформление юридических документов.

2👍2

6 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC29 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Был потрясающий эфир! Как всегда важный!!!

💯1

6 Aug 2026, 10:01 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

📌 Запись эфира с юристом от 6 августа доступна по этой ссылке. Особенно актуально и важно для: - нутрициологов - health-коучей - экспертов по ЗОЖ Т.к. с 1 сентября вступает в силу новый закон. Поделитесь этой информацией с коллегами и знакомыми специалистами. Кто был онлайн, напишите мне в личку, получите в подарок разбор вашего блога.

👍2🔥2

6 Aug 2026, 06:19 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🎁 Сегодня в 12:00 (Мск) участникам эфира лично от себя сделаю классный подарок - индивидуальный разбор одной соцсети! Проверим ваш блог на 2 момента: ✔️ не нарушаете ли закон в вопросах рекламы и npoдаж - триггеры, призывы и проч. ✔️ насколько ваш контент npoдает - покажу, где ваши потенциальные клиенты проходят мимо 🔥 Вы получите точечные рекомендации "бери, делай, получай переводы на сберкарту". 🔗 Эфир пройдет

🔥3👍1

6 Aug 2026, 05:36 UTC37 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

💰💰💰 Денежный четверг 1. Кофе с корицей - done ✔️ 2. Эфир с юристом, как не попасть на штрафы из-за неправильных формулировок - в 12:00 (Мск). А что выбираете вы?

🔥3👍1

5 Aug 2026, 08:08 UTC49 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

😎 Стыдно признаться, что ты чего-то не знаешь? Я контент-маркетолог и смысловик с опытом 4 года. В инфопроектах делаю все, кроме, пожалуй, настройки таргета в личных кабинетах (на то есть специально обученные люди, мои надежные партнеры 💪🏻). И только что, сижу собираю "актуальное" для очень крутого эксперта, узнала новое слово! 🫢 Стыдно ли мне признаваться в том, что я чего-то не знаю? Что учусь постоянно, получа

🔥5👍2💯2

4 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC65 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026

‼️ Как не получить штраф от РКН за одно "неправильное" слово на лендинге или в блоге Важная информация для нутрициологов, health-коучей, экспертов по ЗОЖ. 👇🏻 6 августа в 12:00 (Мск) юрист Мария Сорокина, мой надежный партнер, проведет эфир, где вы узнаете: 🔹 где проходит граница между консультацией и медициной и как её не переступить 🔹 шаблонная оферта или индивидуальный договор – что реально защитит именно ваш ф

🔥6👍4

3 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTC86 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Какое фото берем?

  1. 13%
  2. 210%
  3. 362%
  4. Триптих!24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

9👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @j_a_spir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Aug 2026, 06:06 UTCAnonymous Poll29 voters

Какое фото берем?

  1. 13%
  2. 210%
  3. 362%
  4. Триптих!24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Смыслы + тексты = 💰💰 | Спиридонова Юлия” (@j_a_spir), 762 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/j_a_spir.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.