Channel
@izlucheniya
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
314subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001454720850 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @izlucheniya |
| Created | 25 November 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/izlucheniya |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:53 | 314 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 316 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:23 | 316 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 March 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 9 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 18 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
вай фай 5джи общее опасность контроль связь металлы фазированные решетки
волны вероятности в огромном окнане полей сознание то что проявляет или формирует реальность #квантовая #физика #поля #волны #вероятность #сознание #связи
30 см электросмоговая волновая зона смартфона https://t.me/OdMalan
БЕСПРОВОДНЫЕ ТЕХНОЛОГИИ НЕ ДЛЯ ИНТЕРНЕТА ИЛИ СВЯЗИ #вышки #башни #мощность #оружие #частота
🦻 + 2,4 gHz = 🌊 #безпроводные #наушники #боль
Исследование, проведенное доктором Генри Лаем из Университета Вашингтона, показало, что даже при низких уровнях воздействие радиочастотных электромагнитных полей и радиочастот (EMF/RF) вызывает повреждение ДНК клеток мозга крыс, что приводит к потере кратковременной и долговременной памяти и замедлению обучения. То есть, даже кратковременное использование сотового телефона может привести к повреждению ДНК в чувствит…
"В доме нет электричества, но вышка 5G за 164 м продолжает работать с превышением в 23 раза от допустимых норм Год назад. Еще терпимо, чуть выше нормы 10 мВт/см2. Сейчас постоянный шум в голове." КАТУШКА ТЕСЛЫ
Главная цель "вакцинации" является никакой не майнинг криптовалюты внутри тела привитого человека, а управление населением через 5G, с помощью вживления металлических пауков в нервную систему людей получивших прививку. Психотронное Оружие - Валерий Канюка, Разработчик в СССР, дистанционного управления человеком, ещё в 1970-х годах (аналог США) .mp4 (Запись от 1988 года, звучит как фантастика но не для нашего времени)…
киматика волнения слова излучения 📼 1280p 💾 3.5MB @Gozilla_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @izlucheniya. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,374,708 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@izlucheniya named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Излучения, волнения, колебания” (@izlucheniya), 314 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izlucheniya.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.