Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

.๐†๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข ุฑุณูŽู…ุฉ ู…ุญุฌูุจู€ุฉ.

@izawc1

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท What this channel posts ยท Reactions ยท Stars ยท Posts ยท Posts edited after publishing ยท Citations ยท Cite this entry

10,251subscribers

+36 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of 10,000โ€“31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003689485105
TypeChannel
Username@izawc1
Description- แท‚ู‚ู†ุงุฉ แท‚ุชุฎุตู†ูŠ ๐Ÿ’ . ูู‚ุท ู…ุญุฌุจุงุช ุณุงูŠุช ุงู„ุชูˆุงุตู„ @iwbsk_bot ู‚ู†ุงุชูŠ ุงู„ุซุงู†ูŠุฉ: @ooo40zz
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 30 April 2026โ€” estimated from Telegramโ€™s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/izawc1

Growth

10,21510,26810,241.510 August 2026 โ€” 10,215 subscribers10 August 2026 โ€” 10,223 subscribers11 August 2026 โ€” 10,252 subscribers12 August 2026 โ€” 10,268 subscribers13 August 2026 โ€” 10,230 subscribers14 August 2026 โ€” 10,251 subscribers10,25110 August 202614 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 5 days, net +36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 10,207โ€“10,276 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:5810,251+21
13 Aug 2026, 14:3910,230-38
12 Aug 2026, 16:0410,268+16
11 Aug 2026, 12:3210,252+29
10 Aug 2026, 09:5110,223+8
10 Aug 2026, 06:1610,215first reading

Engagement

29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
46.5%
avg views รท 10,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,770
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held29 (28 July 2026 โ€“ 15 August 2026)
Views total138,203
Reactions total3,077
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 19:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
240
Links
3

Lifetime counters from Telegramโ€™s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 โ€” not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegramโ€™s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

3,077 reactions across 29 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 88.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
๐Ÿ“2,72688.6%
๐Ÿ’‹2899.39%
โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ622.01%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 3,077reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 29 we hold a reading for ยท 14%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars โ€” bought with money โ€” on a post by @izawc1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramโ€™s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:37 UTC562 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ุงุญุญุญุฐูู

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ5

14 Aug 2026, 22:34 UTCโ‰ˆ1,010 views8 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ุตุฏฺฏูˆู†ูŠ ู‡ูŽุงู„ู‚ู†ุงุฉ ู…ูŽุชุชูƒุฑุฑ ู…ุฑุชูŠู† ููŽู€ ุฃู†ุถู…ูˆุง ู‚ุจู„ ู„ุง ุฃุญุฐูู‡ุง ๐Ÿฅฐ.

๐Ÿ“8

14 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTCโ‰ˆ1,690 views10 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

แท‚ุฃู†ู€ู€ู€ู€ุซู‰ูฐ แท‚ู…ูู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ู† แท‚ู†ุณูŽู„ แท‚ุงู„ูุฑุงุดู€ู€ู€ู€ู€ุงุชู . ุฃู†ูˆุซุชุฌ ุจูƒู„ู…ุฉุŒ ูˆุฐูƒุงุฆุฌ ุจู€ ูƒู„ูŠุดุฉ.. ู‡ู†ุง ู…ู„ุงุฐุฌ ุงู„ุขู…ู† ูƒู„ูŠุดุงุช ูˆุงู‚ุนูŠู‡ ุชูุชุญ ุงู„ู†ูุณ ุฏุฎู„ูˆ ุดู…ู†ุชุถุฑูŠู†ู†ู† https://t.me/+DqW_EfvnWGMxMDgy

๐Ÿ’‹10

14 Aug 2026, 09:59 UTCโ‰ˆ1,820 views17 reactionsread 15 August 2026

ุชูุงุนู„ู† ู‡ู†ุง ุจู†ุงุชุชุช https://t.me/ooo40zz/487

๐Ÿ’‹17

12 Aug 2026, 23:17 UTC314 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ุชูุงุนู„ูˆ ู‡ู†ุง https://t.me/ooo40zz/458

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ4

12 Aug 2026, 19:18 UTC729 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026

ูŠู„ุงุงุงุŸ

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ6

12 Aug 2026, 11:55 UTC303 views7 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ุจุณ ู‡ุงุฐ ุชูุงุนู„..ุŸ!

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ7

12 Aug 2026, 01:07 UTC818 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ุจู†ุงุชุช ุงุฑูŠุฏ ู‚ู†ุงู‡ ุงู‚ุชุจุงุณุงุช ูˆู‡ูŠุฌ ุงู…ูˆุฑ ุงู„ูŠ ุนุฏู‡ุง ุชุฏุฒู„ูŠ ู‡ู†ุง @YZY0l

๐Ÿ“9

11 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC51 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ู„ุชุดู„ุนู† ูƒู„ุจูŠ ุชูุงุนู„ู†ุŸ

๐Ÿ’‹4

11 Aug 2026, 23:56 UTC908 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

https://t.me/+NsEaclFSp0YwYjBi ุฃู†ูˆุซุชุฌ ุจูƒู„ู…ุฉุŒ ูˆุฐูƒุงุฆุฌ ุจู€ ูƒู„ูŠุดุฉ.. ู‡ู†ุง ู…ู„ุงุฐุฌ ุงู„ุขู…ู† ูƒู„ูŠุดุงุช ูˆุงู‚ุนูŠู‡ ุชูุชุญ ุงู„ู†ูุณ ุฏุฎู„ูˆ ุดู…ู†ุชุถุฑูŠู†ู†ู†๐Ÿคฉโœจ https://t.me/+NsEaclFSp0YwYjBi

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ13

11 Aug 2026, 19:57 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ุชูุงุนู„ + ู†ุฌู…ู‡ ู‡ู†ุงุง ๐Ÿ˜–

โคโ€๐Ÿ”ฅ10

10 Aug 2026, 16:12 UTC125 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

ุจูŠุณุญู‚ ุจู„ูŠุฒุฒ

๐Ÿ’‹3

Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @izawc1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@izawc1 edited 2 posts after it first published โ€” the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too โ€” this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 544,838 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ.๐†๐ž๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐ข ุฑุณูŽู…ุฉ ู…ุญุฌูุจู€ุฉ.โ€ (@izawc1), 10,251 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/izawc1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.