Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

⋆|.уголок тюленя🦭.|⋆ [рест]

@iwwtulen

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

4subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001879055921
TypeChannel
Username@iwwtulen
Description— йоу, ты попал(а) в уголок тюленя, надеюсь тебе тут понравится!🦭💌
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 1 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/iwwtulen

Growth

413 Aug 2026, 08:30 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 09:46 — 4 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 08:3013 Aug 2026, 09:46
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3–5 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 09:464no change
13 Aug 2026, 08:304first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 April 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
263
Videos
7
Links
42

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
10s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

53 reactions across 20 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2445.3%
🕊1630.2%
47.55%
🍓47.55%
🌭11.89%
🎉11.89%
👍11.89%
😢11.89%
😱11.89%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 53reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2023 to 11 April 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Apr 2023, 12:47 UTC135 views5 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Дела у меня как всегда хорошо, осталось сегодня сделать домашку на завтра и я буду свободна

🕊211🍓1

11 Apr 2023, 12:46 UTC136 views6 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Купите мне кто то чёрное кольцо это или вообще любое, главное чёрное.. 😭 А ещё мне мама сделала маникюр, выглядит вроде неплохо, цвет лака такой оливковый или бледно-болотный зелёный, хэх

🕊311🍓1

9 Apr 2023, 14:21 UTC94 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Также немного думала о своих друзьях вчера ночью, сегодня утром было солнечно и все гуляли с друзьями, от этого я себя почувствовала прям очень одиноко, ведь такое ощущение что у меня нет друзей, а одни знакомые в реальности. Да и если вспоминать про библиотеку то я сама по себе довольно серьёзный человек, пока моя подруга и одноклассница общались на презентации в библиотеке, я молча сидела и слушала, но вообще скоре

2🍓1🕊1

9 Apr 2023, 14:17 UTC89 views4 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Эхэх, всё приветики, я жива, просто хочется рассказать про то как проходили эти дни, ну вообще я всю неделю просто училась, а сегодня я ходила в церковь, а потом маминых знакомых навещали в больнице, пока были на улице такой ливень пошёл, а я вообще без капюшона даже, в пальто пошла, но зато не было особо холодно, в итоге попросила отдать платок чтобы немного голову прикрыть. А так день был неплохой, солнышко появило

2🍓1🕊1

4 Apr 2023, 09:45 UTC45 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Йоу, я вернулась с библиотеки, было неплохо , но там была моя бывшая подруга.. но проблема в том что она вела себя очень дружелюбно, она со мной даже старалась общаться, улыбалась, ещё и оладушками своими поделилась (она просто с рюкзаком пришла и едой) и я не знаю как это воспринимать даже, она и комплимент мне сказала.. ну это подозрительно для меня если честно, да и я была не настроена на какое-то общение с ней, п

1🎉1🕊1

3 Apr 2023, 16:55 UTC36 views3 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Я так рада что завтра с подружкой встречусь, щас взорвусь от радости.(⁠ㆁ⁠ω⁠ㆁ⁠)

2🕊1

3 Apr 2023, 16:47 UTC31 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ещё завтра нужно в школу пойти, в библиотеку, не знаю что я там буду делать, но наш классный руководитель сказал туда топать, ну кто хочет, мама решила что мне туда надо, ну а я в принципе не против, там хоть с подругой встречусь, эхэх, ну и уроки пропущу

1🕊1

3 Apr 2023, 16:44 UTC29 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Ааа, мне нужно писать к.р. с описанием местности, но у меня нет сил и вдохновения, а нужно уже в среду сдать, тем более и другая домашка есть ....

1😱1

3 Apr 2023, 12:01 UTC28 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

Добрый денёк всем, сегодня я всё же отучилась и не уснула, прям прогресс, только жаль погода плохая, солнца толком нет, да и настроения так себе, надеюсь у вас всех всё хорошо, эхэ

1🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iwwtulen. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,445,608 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋆|.уголок тюленя🦭.|⋆ [рест]” (@iwwtulen), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iwwtulen.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.