#استوری صل الله علیک یا مظلوم یا اباعبدالله با نوای گرم حاج مهدی سلحشور

Channel
هوش سفید
@iwebnevis
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001159301180 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iwebnevis |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iwebnevis |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 3 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:38 | 3 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 October 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 105
- Videos
- 148
- Links
- 122
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 19m 51s
- Average length
- 2m 29s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💩 | 1 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2022 to 20 July 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
⭕️ 🔴 چی میشه یک بچه میره مسائل غیر اخلاقی جستجو میکنه؟! ⭕️پدران و مادران دغدغه مند ببینند... اینجا ببینید👇👇 با کلی کلیپ مجانی سواد رسانه ای و تربیت فرزند در عصر دیجیتال https://eitaa.com/joinchat/3938451489C1398acf257
باید زاویه دید ما نسبت به این مسائل صحیح باشد؛ ما تا زاویه دیدمان منطبق بر هویت، فرهنگ و حکمرانی الهی که در یک نزاع تمدنی که اکنون به لبه خود رسیده و تبدیل به جنگ ترکیبی شده است، نباشد، هر چه بیاید فقط آسیبهایش نصیب ما میشود. ما میتوانیم سه نوع دید داشته باشیم، یک دید نگاه فناوریهراسانه است که فقط آن را آسیبزا دانسته و راهکار برخورد با آن، فیلتر کردن است. نگاه دیگر فناوریشیفته است که همهاش فرصت است و تجویزش ره…
اصل این فناوری برای ما آسیبزاست. برای دنیا هم همین است. اگر این طور نبود، چرا اروپاییها GDPR را به عنوان رگولاتوری فضای سایبر پیادهسازی کردند. چرا آنها اینترنت اروپایی را در سال ۲۰۱۱ راهاندازی کردند. این فناوری ذات آمریکایی دارد و آمریکاییها به ذات تروریست هستند و دقیقاً در فضای سایبر هم همین ذات تروریستی را دارند. بنابراین شما با یک داعشی آمریکایی سر میز مذاکره مینشینید؟ خیر. در فضای متاورس و سایبر هم همین کار…
💠سید علیرضا آلداود در نشست تخصصی بررسی اخلاق در متاورس/۱: 💠این بحث چند نکته مهم دارد، یکی از این مباحث زاویه دید ما نسبت به فناوریهایی است که در حال حاضر در سطح دنیا وجود دارد و ما هم میخواهیم از آنها استفاده کنیم. مسئله مهم این است که آیا ما باید در بحث گلوبالیزم یا نظم نوین جهانی حذف شویم یا خیر؟ زیرا آمریکاییها ذیل این مباحث، حکمرانی را دارند و درباره آن مطالعه و برنامهریزی راهبردی میکنند. یکی از این بحثه…
https://twitter.com/iwebnevis/status/1611287430967005184?t=4gRriakL0BMInuwhDmxhGQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/iwebnevis/status/1610675284365414400?t=MKcm1tDNgknf8xHw1Ck6sQ&s=19
https://twitter.com/iwebnevis/status/1610318747188748289?s=46&t=72OvS3ALlcAs15FUnUwgxw
روایت رسانه آمریکایی از شب جهنمی تروریستهای این کشور در عین الاسد... ایران انتقامش سخت، کوبنده، برق آسا و پشیمان کننده است. داعش خبرنگارها و بنفش ها این شب ها لانه موش اجاره کنند. ┄┅┅┅✿✾❀✾✿┅┅┅┄ 💠 مدرس سواد و تربیت رسانهای شوید 📱 💠https://eitaa.com/joinchat/225181696C454655872b ┄┅┅┅✿✾❀✾✿┅┅┅┄
💠در مکتب امام دلها: 🔴 آیات قتال را چرا نمیخوانید؟ هی آیات رحمت را میخوانید! آن قتال هم رحمت است برای این که میخواهد آدم درست کند. آدم گاهی درست نمیشود مرض گاهی صحیح نمیشود،الّا بِالْکَیّ؛ باید ببرند،داغ کنند تا درست شود جامعه. باید آنهایی که فاسد هستند،از آن بیرون ریخته شوند. امام روحالله(ره)|بهمن۶۳ ┄┅┅┅✿✾❀✾✿┅┅┅┄ 💠 مدرس سواد و تربیت رسانهای شوید 📱 💠https://eitaa.com/joinchat/225181696C454655872b ┄┅┅┅✿✾❀✾✿┅┅┅┄
در جنگ شناختی ادراکی برای تولید پیام روی خطاهای ادراکی مخاطب حساب ویژهای میشود. به عنوان مثال با زوم کردن روی این تصاویر میفهمید که در واقع هیچ رنگ قرمزی وجود نداره و این ساخته و پرداخته مغز شماست... https://twitter.com/iwebnevis/status/1587741048750718976?t=dXj77CTO0NIm9kkDpxbD-g&s=19
https://twitter.com/iwebnevis/status/1585554645421809664?t=s1EO_YpdUjhkvrr5Ml2hVA&s=19
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iwebnevis. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 315,180 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هوش سفید” (@iwebnevis), 3 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iwebnevis.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.