These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
69.0 average views per post against 11,999 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.575%. Across the 1,968 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,004–31,618 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 10.8% and 30.1%, with a median of 18.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (31 July 2026 – 30 August 2026)
Posts measured
16 of 16 published in the window (16 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
1,104
Mature posts only
0.575% over 16 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 30 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 23 days, net +11,863. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
30 Aug 2026, 16:34
11,999
-1
29 Aug 2026, 19:28
12,000
+4
28 Aug 2026, 16:08
11,996
+1
27 Aug 2026, 13:37
11,995
+7
26 Aug 2026, 14:24
11,988
+2
24 Aug 2026, 12:23
11,986
-1
22 Aug 2026, 16:33
11,987
+2
21 Aug 2026, 04:18
11,985
+5
20 Aug 2026, 01:32
11,980
+3
18 Aug 2026, 22:05
11,977
+1
17 Aug 2026, 20:28
11,976
-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:46
11,978
+1,817
15 Aug 2026, 13:26
10,161
+10,025
8 Aug 2026, 23:31
136
no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:54
136
first reading
Engagement
35 posts held, back to 29 July 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.575%
avg views ÷ 11,999 subscribers
Avg views / post
69.0
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 35 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 5 of 16 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held
35 (29 July 2024 – 27 August 2026)
Views total
1,104
Reactions total
14
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
30 Aug 2026, 09:52 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 18s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
65
47.4%
❤
18
13.1%
🔥
15
10.9%
🤡
11
8.03%
🥰
7
5.11%
🥴
7
5.11%
😁
6
4.38%
👏
5
3.65%
🤣
2
1.46%
🤬
1
0.73%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 137reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2024 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ось переклад підготовленого матеріалу українською мовою:
---
Занедбані могили замість «пантеону»: як в Україні вшановують пам'ять загиблих бійців
Київ – Напередодні Дня Незалежності та Дня пам'яті загиблих захисників України спалахнув скандал, який проливає світло на справжній стан справ із доглядом за військовими похованнями в регіонах. До редакції потрапили фотографії, зроблені партнером Міністерства у справах в…
🇺🇦 Голоси зсередини: в Україні дедалі гучніше звучить тема перемир'я
Довгий час публічна дискусія в Україні будувалася навколо однієї формули: «до переможного кінця». Але політичний ландшафт — це живий організм, і сьогодні в ньому з'являються нові акценти.
📌 Що змінюється?
Низка українських політиків, експертів та громадських діячів дедалі частіше говорять про ціну затяжного конфлікту. Звучать слова, які раніше в …
🤬Поляки напали на українських дітей через українську мову, — консульство України.
14-річній дівчинці викрутили руку, а її 12-річному брату кинули в обличчя уламки зламаного іграшкового дрона. Поліція вже розшукує нападників.
Увага українцям в Польщі: українські номери з 4 вересня більше не рятуватимуть від штрафів із дорожніх камер, — Мінцифри Польщі.
Після запуску системи польські служби зможуть звернутися до українських реєстрів для встановлення власників автомобілів. До цього часу відсутність такого механізму часто не дозволяла притягти до відповідальності водіїв автомобілів з українськими номерами.
росія сплатить за кожен злочин: Міжнародний Реєстр збитків розширює прийом заяв, – Буданов.
«рф має заплатити за кожен свій злочин і компенсувати кожну гривню, витрачену на подолання наслідків агресії...Створення міжнародних механізмів фіксації збитків не дозволить Росії уникнути відповідальності».
У Познані затримали неадекватну польку, яка напала на українців.
Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @ivf_24. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Івано-Франківськ 24/ Ивано-Франковск 24” (@ivf_24), 11,999 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivf_24.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
