Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 95 days, net -48. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,744–9,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 18:01
9,788
-7
5 Nov 2026, 14:56
9,795
-10
3 Nov 2026, 00:06
9,805
-16
30 Oct 2026, 21:05
9,821
-16
27 Oct 2026, 23:19
9,837
-12
22 Oct 2026, 12:56
9,849
+3
19 Oct 2026, 06:06
9,846
+8
16 Oct 2026, 04:00
9,838
-11
12 Oct 2026, 20:07
9,849
+47
5 Oct 2026, 21:19
9,802
+44
28 Sept 2026, 15:38
9,758
-3
19 Sept 2026, 02:40
9,761
-13
14 Sept 2026, 19:21
9,774
-11
11 Sept 2026, 04:41
9,785
-3
6 Sept 2026, 12:16
9,788
-12
2 Sept 2026, 06:17
9,800
+1
30 Aug 2026, 05:35
9,799
-2
27 Aug 2026, 03:24
9,801
+26
24 Aug 2026, 07:33
9,775
-8
20 Aug 2026, 19:37
9,783
first reading
Engagement
60 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
43.5%
avg views ÷ 9,788 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,250
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 60 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
60 (17 July 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
97,860
Reactions total
1,866
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Nov 2026, 10:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈957
Videos
≈224
Links
≈1,780
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
1m 34s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,166 reactions across 59 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,639
31.7%
🤬
778
15.1%
❤
390
7.55%
😁
387
7.49%
💯
380
7.36%
🤡
274
5.30%
🤔
244
4.72%
💊
167
3.23%
😢
122
2.36%
🥴
102
1.97%
👏
91
1.76%
🔥
90
1.74%
🤣
63
1.22%
😨
58
1.12%
🤷♂
53
1.03%
🤯
49
0.949%
🤷♀
49
0.949%
🤨
31
0.6%
😈
30
0.581%
🙏
24
0.465%
22 further kinds
145
2.81%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 60 of the 60 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,255 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 60 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ivan_preobraz. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 60 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (34.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
«Обычный ротационный процесс» — Песков о закрытии «Новой газеты» и других независимых российских СМИ
Сегодня — последний день работы «Новой газеты». Главный редактор издания Руслан Соколов провел последнюю планёрку перед полной остановкой работы издания. После нее журналисты забрали свои вещи и покинули офис в центре Москвы, где журналисты проработали 29 лет.
Пресс-секретарь Путина Дмитрий Песков прокомментировал э…
Чем пожертвовала Европа ради Абу-Даби?
Глава МИД Франции заявил, что его страна и ЕС будут представлены на переговорах по Украине в Абу-Даби.
И главный вопрос не в том, зачем они там нужны. Главный, полагаю, вопрос, чем пришлось поступиться европейским эмиссарам, чтобы их на эту встречу "на троих" пустили.
Или если еще проще, пришлось ли ЕС обещать поступиться интересами Украины, чтобы европейцев пустили на встреч…
Вэнс нашел виноватого в поражении республиканцев - это Израиль
Вице-президент США Джей Ди Вэнс назвал войну с Ираном и дружбу с Израилем главными причинами победы демократов на промежуточных выборах в США.
Вэнс в Твиттере сослался на социолога, который якобы предсказал отставание республиканцев от демократов по стране ровно на 13%. Тот спросил отвернувшихся от Республиканской партии избирателей (а именно они по Вэн…
Польша, Норвегия и Финляндия запустили программы подготовки резервистов к возможной войне с Россией
Норвегия, Финляндия и Польша расширяют программы военной подготовки населения на фоне угрозы со стороны России. Граждан учат обращаться с оружием, вести бои в городской застройке, использовать беспилотники и оказывать помощь раненым, пишет газета Bild.
В Норвегии нынешний год объявлен годом «тотальной обороны». Согла…
Освободится ли теперь Республиканская партия США от диктата Дональда Трампа?
Он так плотно контролирует партию, что это невозможно12%
Нет никакого диктата9%
Бунт внутрипартийных оппонентов неизбежен, ядром будут те, кого он отстранил от участия в выборах70%
Республиканцы наоборот сплотятся вокруг своего президента3%
Скорее вновь возрастет риск появления в США третьей партии10%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Россия и Украина возобновят переговоры в Абу-Даби 10 ноября. Москву представит Мединский, европейцев не пригласили
Россия и Украина возобновят переговоры при посредничестве США 10–11 ноября в Абу-Даби после почти девятимесячного перерыва. Российскую делегацию возглавит помощник Путина Владимир Мединский, американскую, как ожидается, представят Стив Уиткофф и Джаред Кушнер. Состав украинской делегации пока не объявле…
В мире, который они построили, могут спокойно насиловать и их детей,и их самих
Прокремлевский хакер Павел Ситников рассказал об отказе СК расследовать изнасилование его дочери в «Сириусе»
Согласно словам Ситникова в его канале Freedom Fox, изнасилование несовершеннолетней девушки произошло в ночь с 17 на 18 октября в общежитии колледжа «Сириус» на одноименной федеральной территории. Дочь Ситникова якобы оказалась п…
Позвони мне, позвони... Позвони мне ради Бога!
Путин ответит на телефонный звонок, если ему позвонит Зеленский, сообщил помощник президента РФ Юрий Ушаков.
Помимо известной песни из советского кинематографа, вспоминается еще неприличный анекдот, заканчивающийся, в известном мне варианте, словами: "Не напишет, и не позвонит".
Путин и его окружение продолжают настаивать публично на фактической капитуляции Украины, я…
Интересно, конечно, что били витрины вчера в Германии, в итоге, как я понимаю, только в самом "биржевом" и пухнущем от денег Франкфурте-на-Майне.
Даже в традиционно известным своим буйным левацким Первомаем Берлине все прошло традиционно шумно, но заметно более законопослушно.
Вместе с началом в Италии протестов с площади у Миланского собора, этой туристической мекке и точке показного потребления, вместе с массовым …
Политолога Александра Кынева перевели в новую камеру с «нормальным сантехническим оборудованием»
В новой камере у находящегося в московском СИЗО-4 «Медведь» Александра Кынева живут четыре сокамерника, рассказал адвокат Михаил Бирюков.
Ранее политолог объявил голодовку из-за отсутствия возможности сходить в туалет. «Его перевели в камеру 213, самая большая в „Медведе“, на 34 человека, там 35 арестантов. Вместо туале…
Такая красивая картинка получилась и вроде и комментарий по делу (нескромно добавлю) про переговоры норвежско-финнской пары с Путиным, что я попросил коллег прислать ссылку с таймкодами и предлагаю вам посмотреть.
Прикол еще и в том, что мой стенд с телефоном стоит на кладбищенской ограде, что выглядит, к сожалению, весьма сейчас символично. Лицо у меня, щурящееся на солнце тоже соответствует моменту.
https://www.yo…
Выборы в Израиле - понятно, что ничего не понятно и все может дойти до новых выборов
Основные данные экзит-поллов израильских телеканалов показывают, что блок кандидата Гади Айзенкота стал крупнейшей группой на выборах в Израиле, немного опередив правящую коалицию, но значительно не дотянув до большинства.
Ликуд премьер-министра Нетаньяху, как ожидается, станет крупнейшей партией в израильском парламенте, Кнессете.…
🤨17🤷♂14👍8❤3🥱2💅1
Showing the 12 most recent of 60 posts we hold for @ivan_preobraz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @ivan_preobraz as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
10 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Освободится ли теперь Республиканская партия США от диктата Дональда Трампа?
Он так плотно контролирует партию, что это невозможно12%
Нет никакого диктата9%
Бунт внутрипартийных оппонентов неизбежен, ядром будут те, кого он отстранил от участия в выборах70%
Республиканцы наоборот сплотятся вокруг своего президента3%
Скорее вновь возрастет риск появления в США третьей партии10%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Мобилизация и так идет, указ Путина 2022 года не отменялся51%
Конечно. Я вижу, как российские власти готовятся25%
Я не в России, мне все равно9%
Конечно, и после нее Россия победит0%
Верю, готовлюсь и собираюсь уехать в начале сентября1%
Мобилизация будет и это станет началом конца, потому что все рухнет19%
Не будет никакой мобилизации6%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Политолог Екатерина Шульман о причинах участия "Яблока" в выборах в Госдуму:
Екатерина Шульман много раз говорила, что не дает прогнозы23%
Отстаньте от меня с этими "выборами", идет война, а это чушь22%
Что это, если не прогноз?8%
Я всегда голосую за Яблоко16%
Это Кремль включил своих агентов, чтобы помешать единственной антивоенной партии11%
Кто все эти люди, и новые, и старые?19%
Я политикой не интересуюсь, вся ваша политика - это схематозы2%
Зачем спрашиваете?14%
The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 60 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Николай Травкин @NTravkin · 25,080 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 September 2026
Пархомбюро @sparkhomenkovoice · 28,310 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Andrey Malgin @AndreyMalginItalia · 18,602 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Подосокорский @podosokorsky · 29,659 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
Бедный Рюрик @akalitin · 30,347 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Professor Preobrazhensky” (@ivan_preobraz), 9,788 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ivan_preobraz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.