谢谢我的好哥哥,给我写的好评,爱你😘

Channel
妍妍日常
@iugdgyi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4,079subscribers
+943 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003218967436 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iugdgyi |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iugdgyi |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 4,079 | -52 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 16:41 | 4,131 | -148 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 07:39 | 4,279 | -16 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:37 | 4,295 | +1,218 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 08:54 | 3,077 | -45 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:26 | 3,122 | -14 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:30 | 3,136 | no change |
| 29 Aug 2026, 16:15 | 3,136 | first reading |
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 15 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.02%
- avg views ÷ 4,079 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 41.5
- 4 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 4
- of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (15 August 2026 – 29 August 2026) |
| Views total | 166 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 16:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 2s
- Average length
- 2s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
【老师艺名】 #妍妍 【联系方式】 @ubhdii 【所在位置】上城教室 【验证留名明明 【验证时间】8.29 【修车费用】1500P 【颜值身材】165/B➕ 【服务内容】课表都安排 【服务态度】很好👍不催 【推荐程度】9.8 【体验细节】 【过程描述】:看到了妍妍老师的好评,很是心动,遂约好今日的头课,驱车前往。一开门老师穿着一身黑裙,也掩盖不住身材的曼妙,雪白的奶子和大长腿若隐若现,小弟直接抬头了,再仔细看老师的颜值,涂着红唇,颜值颇高,跟我想象中的学妹一致无二。交完水费,简单冲洗来到床上。果然还是姐姐会疼人,先是背部按摩,然后用湿热的舌头舔过肌肤,边舔还边刺激我的蛋蛋,二弟坚硬如铁,快把床板顶穿了。老师看出我的难受,让我跪趴着,开始毒龙,从浅入深,小👅慢慢探索,舔的我浑身哆嗦。翻过身来,老师展示了她的360°口,还把腿翘起来让我欣赏小鲍鱼,我摸了几下准备收手,谁知老师主动拿着我的手往她逼上按,摩擦她的阴蒂,渐渐的老师出…
🥐艺名: 大一妍妍 🤗尺年: 165 体重:47 熊:B 📍位置: #上城区 💸价格: 1500 p 2600 pp 🎮标签: #千元榜 舌吻 丝袜 69 ✒️报告:https://t.me/hxhzbgb/179 🥂联系老师: @ubhdii 💓老师频道:https://t.me/iugdgyi ⚜️韩信优选榜:https://t.me/hxhzyxb ⚜️韩信精选榜:https://t.me/hxhzjxb 联系老师请说:在韩信优选榜看到推荐的 韩信杭州备用榜:https://t.me/hxhzyx
头课已有约,8点后🈳
【老师艺名】:杭州大一妍妍 【联系方式】: @ubhdii 【验证留名】:匿名 【验证时间】:8月22号 【所在位置】上城区教室 【修车水费】:1500P 【是否代聊】:认证本人 【身高身材】:166/B➕ 【妹子年龄】: 19 【湿度紧度】: 紧,水多 【颜值相似】:10分 【凶器罩杯】:B➕ 【服务内容】:课表安排上 【过程描述】:看妍妍老师评价很好,都说紧,口活也好。就来找老师。老师头课还在,惦记很久了,预约了时间马上出发我提前到了找车位,在路边等了老师一会。一见面老师就道歉说下着雨过来辛苦了,让我久等了。很有礼貌。老师形象很好,个子很高,浅色裙子感觉很清新,很温柔,态度超级好,如沐春风。交了水费开始行动。。老师胸比较大蹭我的腿,开始亲我,热水漫游很舒服,热水舔我的胸真爽。。口活冰火两重天交替,震动棒爆炸糖果冻口活,爽歪歪了。。老师口活太好了,果然像狼友说的那样口活时间很长的。深喉超舒服,口我的时候,舌头还能一边口一边在我…
想吃😋棉花糖,可以给我买吗
杭州秋雅总群:https://telegram.me/nanjinggeren66 🌳【客名】:一只懒猫 📆【日期】: 8月19日 🧘♀【老师】: #妍妍 📮【联系】:@ubhdii 🏡【位置】:上城区 💰【课费】:2600pp 🌏【罩杯】:B+ 🧖♀【服务】:都有 📋【详情】:开门顺利进入教室。看着妍妍两边肩带半挂着,露出了胸前那一抹春光,也是赶紧抱了抱顺便狠狠的摸了很久没吃过的大白兔,然后去到了沙发开始事前烟聊聊天诉说着最近的一些趣事,今天时间晚看已经累了,于是我就自己去光速冲洗了一下,等我洗完进房间就看到已经换好战袍在床上等着我了,今天太累就没有让妹妹做服务了,我先吃了会大白兔把玩了下小豆豆,就被妹妹一口含住了弟弟,妹妹的口技依旧无话可说,吸的很舒服。快受不了了就直接戴上超薄传教士起手一插到底,一进去就被紧紧包裹住了,听着的喘息和浪叫,我也是动作越来越快,就在快受不了的时候,不想就这么结束赶紧换成了后入,后入就更…
有空啦,头课还在,@ubhdii
有时候,挺无奈的,其实吧我不懂这是什么心理~但是我挺生气😤……你可以不喜欢我,可以不爱我,但是不可以欺骗我……愿所有美好如期降临,抛开不必要的不开心
死骗子一个……
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @iugdgyi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“妍妍日常” (@iugdgyi), 4,079 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iugdgyi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.