Channel
@iu_aml
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
89subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001460505053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @iu_aml |
| Description | Innopolis University MLKR lab applied research. News, announcements, and plumbus. @sprotasov |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/iu_aml |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 89 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:29 | 89 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 May 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
62 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 30 | 48.4% | |
| 👍 | 15 | 24.2% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 19.4% | |
| 🤩 | 5 | 8.06% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 62reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 May 2024 to 21 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://arxiv.org/html/2603.21852v2 And what you can do now - express analytical functions with just one operator eml(x,y) = exp(x) - ln(y) Building an AST for (any) math formula is now basically encoding a binary tree with numbers/variables on the leaves. So you may regress on both coefficients AND function at the same time. At least I predict lots of cool math puzzles and fun results!
🔥3
Signed Stanislav Protasov
Please, let programmers spend as much time in the loo, as they need.
🔥3🤩1
Signed Stanislav Protasov
https://wp.doc.ic.ac.uk/cairesfe/wp-content/uploads/sites/80/2014/12/reject.pdf I found this paper mentioned in Bertrand Meyer's blog. This is a 20-year-old satirical paper, which shows how the landmark papers of software engineering might be rejected by reviewers. I won't judge the quality of the text and humour, but I want to highlight, that the papers reviewed in this text are indeed the basis of my CS education…
🔥2
Signed Stanislav Protasov
Have you ever heard of NFL theorem (no free lunch theorem)? This is the statement (approximately), that if you average performance of the algorithm on all the problems, it will be the same: if somewhere you are better, in the other place you are worse. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_free_lunch_in_search_and_optimization
Signed Stanislav Protasov
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RANDU sometimes, you have to invent something really horrible to show, what can go wrong, and to provide good examples for quality tests. RANDU was a widely used easy to implement pseudorandom generator, which bad properties can be derived arithmetically in 2 lines (which you may find in wikipedia). But who cared 🙂
Signed Stanislav Protasov
DeepMind… as usual. https://research.google/blog/accelerating-scientific-breakthroughs-with-an-ai-co-scientist/ Yesterday they presented an AI co-scientist: multi-agentic Gemini 2 based system, purposed to evaluate and propose novel research ideas based on exploration of SoTA literature, internal debates and hell … all other smart AI tricks. Model is assessed against GPQA (multiple-choice graduate level questions) s…
👍3
Signed Stanislav Protasov
A bit of relevant humour. From
🔥3❤2
Signed Stanislav Protasov
https://youtu.be/3F49KFT9leI?si=9j5yZYE24-_WF5JT It was fast! For those who did not join, you may watch a recording. We spent another 40 minutes beyond recording time and had interesting conversations with the Serbian community! Thanks! And thanks to my only fan for joining ;)
🔥4❤2🤩1
Signed Stanislav Protasov
A reminder, starting soon!
Signed Stanislav Protasov
LinkedIn brought me two posts in a row. One was about major breakthroughs in AI for the last 4 years. One of these advances was "improvements in matrix multiplication". The other one was this text with slides (slides attached in comments), telling about a startup founder visiting another startup in City (London) to give a talk on matrix multiplication. I am not into the topic at all, but I was teaching parts of HPC h…
❤3🔥1🤩1
Signed Stanislav Protasov
From the depth of the ocean, the beast arose to herald the following. Next Thursday, Jan 30 (5PM UK, 6PM Belgrade, 8PM Moscow/Innopolis) I will give an online talk at Quantum Serbia about QEC. This is a mixture of things I was presenting at Math Club of Innopolis University, and a presentation I was giving in DataScienceConference this year. So, grab your whisky, and join! https://www.meetup.com/quantum-serbia/even…
❤4🔥3
Signed Stanislav Protasov
УСЛУГИ ПРОСТИТУТОК: ОСНОВНЫЕ ПРЕИМУЩЕСТВА АЗС Новгорода, СТО Автосервисы Проститутки Ростова – это отличная возможность не потерять лицо и продемонстрировать своим друзьям, что рядом достойная женщина. Многие говорят, что мы критикуем только РИНЦ. Для баланса мы решили немного пошариться в самом популярном во всем мире поисковике научных статей Google scholar. Представляем вам одного из самых продуктивных авторов:…
🔥8
Signed Stanislav Protasov
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @iu_aml. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Research with Stas” (@iu_aml), 89 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iu_aml.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.