и конусы любимые 🙃
custom 536652444193524879813custom 54225865598556167837custom 54611294804058015895

Channel
@itzzlash
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,114subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 18 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001813369269 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itzzlash |
| Description | пока все делают «natural» - я делаю опахала 🇺🇸 American, XXL длины, трендовые эффекты - это ко мне 🫦авторские курсы: база с 0 и повышения |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 18 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itzzlash |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 1,114 | no change |
| 18 Sept 2026, 20:47 | 1,114 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 14 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 9 (14 September 2026 – 18 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,779 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
231 reactions across 9 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5461129480405801589 | 71 | 30.7% | |
| custom 5366524441935248798 | 64 | 27.7% | |
| custom 5422586559855616783 | 39 | 16.9% | |
| custom 5417979807998692351 | 33 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5217603374433740337 | 24 | 10.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2026 to 18 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
и конусы любимые 🙃
custom 536652444193524879813custom 54225865598556167837custom 54611294804058015895
носку давно не показывала на ресницах ремувер
custom 54611294804058015899custom 54225865598556167836custom 53665244419352487984
ладно признаю, меня уже заебало арабское наращивание…а точнее видосы про него, какие-то ссаные эксперты выкладывают миллион видосов где «разбирают» этот эффект, но у самих на аккаунте нет фото работы в этой технике и их максимум мокрый с лучами 😳 нет, русские мастера (обычно старой школы) не должны вообще трогать все зарубежные техники…из красивых ресниц «заграничных» получается русская хуйня. вон американское наращ…
custom 536652444193524879828custom 54179798079986923518custom 52176033744337403375
окна на октябрь скину 26 сентября в 17:00
custom 542258655985561678314custom 52176033744337403378custom 54179798079986923517
я по приколу сняла видос а он залетел блин….почему именно он а не какая-то работа ахуенная…
custom 546112948040580158923custom 52176033744337403378custom 54225865598556167837
Девочки,хочу посоветовать вам один классный интернет-магазин- STAR SHOP🛍️💗 https://t.me/starshop010 На любой вкус и цвет,различные разделы товаров,каждый что-то для себя найдет по super доступным ценам! По промокоду «BEAUTY» вам сделают скидочку 15% при заказе от 2.000₽❗️ Let’s go за покупочками!🛍️
custom 53665244419352487986custom 54611294804058015894custom 54225865598556167833
в конце месяца ко мне приедет ЛС изгиб до 20мм 🙃 ай ай ай вот заживем
custom 54611294804058015898custom 53665244419352487985custom 54225865598556167832
все 18 МОИХ фото она удалила, ок🤪 я просто не понимаю нахуя это делать? ну вот придет клиент по моему фото - мастер сделает хуйню, и кто виноват? это очень прям очень глупые люди делают
custom 546112948040580158919custom 53665244419352487985custom 52176033744337403373
нет я уже не знаю нахуй как бороться с ебланками которые пиздят чужие работы… водяной знак? да похуй им, они его стирают с фото)) 1 фото - оригинал моей работы с ВЗ 2 фото - с авито горе мастера
custom 541797980799869235118custom 53665244419352487983custom 54611294804058015893
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @itzzlash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“itzzlash🪽” (@itzzlash), 1,114 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itzzlash.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.