5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -44. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,260–1,318 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Aug 2026, 22:56
1,267
-7
15 Aug 2026, 01:57
1,274
-36
11 Aug 2026, 14:12
1,310
-1
11 Aug 2026, 14:00
1,311
no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:47
1,311
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
85.1%
avg views ÷ 1,267 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,080
16 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.07%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
20 (15 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
17,244
Reactions total
874
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
11 Aug 2026, 14:00 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,074 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
237
22.1%
👍
199
18.5%
❤
169
15.7%
💋
169
15.7%
💘
143
13.3%
😭
66
6.15%
💔
42
3.91%
💅
22
2.05%
🍓
21
1.96%
😨
3
0.279%
🦄
3
0.279%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,074reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
12
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itsminnielife. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
حق هویت و بیان جنسیتی
"The Right to Gender Identity and Gender Expression"
>جامعهای که به هویت و بیان جنسیتی افراد بدون تبعیض احترام میذاره جامعهای هستش که آدم ها میتونن بدون ترس از تبعیض و خشونت هم از طرف مردم هم از طرف جامعه خود واقعیشون باشن
—
هویت جنسیتی(Sex) یکی از بخش های مهم هویت هر انسانی هستش که به احساس درونی افراد نسبت به جنسیت خودشون مربوطه و این هویت ممکنه با جنسیتی که هنگام تولد به اون فرد نسبت داده…
Btw.... مهم اینه طنین کنسل شد
"تبریک به ترنس ها"
یه ترنس ترنسفوب،زن ستیز دیگه از کامیونیتی ما ترنس ها کنسل شد این تبریک داره؟
زمانی تبریک بگین که هیچ واژه ترنسفوبیک و زن ستیزانه ای حین کنسل شدن یه زن ترنس یا زن سیس نبینیم
نه مثل امروز که طنین داشت کنسل میشد ده برابر قبل مردم ترنسفوب و زن ستیز بودن و راجب هویت و بدن ترنسا چرت و پرت میگفتن
یه بار دیگه به ترنس کامیونیتی ثابت شد تا وقتی که بقیه از ترنس ها بدشون نیاد ترنسفوب نیستن، ولی وقتی یکی یه حرفی میزنه ترنسفوب میشن
دارید طنین رو کنسل میکنید کمتر راجب بدن و هویت افراد ترنس چرت و پرت تفت بدید جدی خیلی احمقید؟؟! خب هستید دیگه،عقل جهان هزارمی
طنین درسته ترنس میسیژانیستیک و زن ستیزه ولی این دلیل نمیشه بیاید با دد نیمش میسجندرش کنین
ولی قبل تایپ کردن یه کم فکر کنین چه چیزشعری میخاید بنویسید بعد شروع به ن…
🏳️⚧️ Minnie (Queerism) pinned «تاریخچه ای کوتاه از مبارزه زنان در تاریخ "A Brief History of Women's Struggle for Their Rights" مبارزه زنان برای به دست آوردن حقوق زنان تاریخچه ای طولانی داره که در دورههای مختلف زنان برای دستیابی به کمترین حقشون مثل: حقوق سیاسی،اقتصادی،اجتماعی و آموزشی…»
تاریخچه ای کوتاه از مبارزه زنان در تاریخ
"A Brief History of Women's Struggle for Their Rights"
مبارزه زنان برای به دست آوردن حقوق زنان تاریخچه ای طولانی داره که در دورههای مختلف زنان برای دستیابی به کمترین حقشون مثل: حقوق سیاسی،اقتصادی،اجتماعی و آموزشی تلاش کردن و در بسیاری از جوامع گذشته، زنان از حق رای دادن،تحصیل،مالکیت، مشارکت سیاسی،پوشش، و تصمیمگیری مستقل درباره زندگی و بدن خودشون محروم بودن
جنبش های فمینیستی…
اگه "توجه" رو از حرفاتون بگیرن چیزی برای گفتن ندارید
کل کارایی که کردید رو یه لیبل "من که کاری نکردم" میچسبونید و تموم شد رفت؟! اوه چه احمق هایی هستید شماها
در حالی که همه دارن گوه کاریاتونو میبینن
کسی داره بهم میگه توجه دوست دارم که از کون گوهی بودن دوستاش دیفند میکنه و کل متناشون هم هست btw
اره خب من بارها گفتم توجه دوست دارم
At least I'm honest about it💋🩵
At least I'm not ashamed of it
Stay mad
Cry about it yeahhh…
خیلی خنده داره احمق بودن آدمارو تو یه بحثی ببینی که تمومی نداره
حتی زمانی که ترنسفوبیا،Misogynist و هموفوبیا موج میزنه از وجود گوهیشون و مثل نقل و نبات 24 ساعت کارشون یوز دادن اسلر و ریپ جوکه
وقتایی که چیزی برای گفتن ندارن رو میارن به توهین به هویت افراد و میسجندر کردنشون و با عقل Corrupt n misogynistic شون و با یه "ما که چیزی نگفتیم" تمومش میکنن میره
احمق تر کسایی که "دوستاشونن" و از کارای ویردشون دیفند میکنن
U gott…
"Non-binary"
افراد نانباینری
به افرادی نان باینری میگن که هویت جنسیتی اونها خارج از چارچوب مرد/زن قرار میگیره
خیلی از افراد نان باینری از هردو ضمیر برای ایدنیفای کردن استفاده میکنن و برخی خارج از چارچوب و بعضی ها بین دوتا ضمیر و بعضی هاهم ترکیبی استفاده میکنن نانباینری همونطور که گفته شد یکی از هویت جنسیتیه و با گرایش جنسی افراد فرق داره،یک فرد نانباینری میتونه هموسکشوال باشه،بایسکشوال باشه،پنسکشوال باشه،اسکشوال…
تا وقتی بحث بدن زنها،حق زنها و امنیت زنهاست، همه ساکتن.. اما همین که پای مردها وسط میاد، یهو همه کارشناس میشن
زنستیزی بحران اقتصادی نیست، بهونه کردن اقتصاد برای کماهمیت جلوه دادن خشونت علیه زنها فقط یعنی نمیخواید درباره خودِ زنستیزی حرف بزنید چون فقط ازش نمیترسید!
هر بار حرف از زنها میشه، یه عده سریع بحث رو میچرخونن سمت خودشون،دنیا قرار نیست هر بار که زنان از تبعیض میگن، روی شما زوم کنه و توجه بده بهتون و ا…
"حقوق سکسوورکرها"
سکسوورک Sex Work
به افرادی سکس وورکر گفته میشه که خدمات جنسی(sexual services) ارائه میکنن و برای این کار پول و خیلی چیز های دیگه دریافت میکنن
در خیلی از کشورها نگرشهای اجتماعی و قوانین نسبت به سکسورک کاملا متفاوته.. برخی کشورها این کار رو جرمانگاری کردن و برخی شغل سکس وورک رو قانونی و همچنین تحت نظارت قرار دادن
در کنار تمام این اختلافها "حقوق سکسوورکرها" به یکی از مباحث مهم حقوق بشر تبدیل …
خواستم ازتون تشکر کنم که کنارم بودین این چند روز
واقعا حالم رو بهتر کردید و کنارم بودین با وجود اینهمه مشکلات، اگه نبودید یک درصد هم نمیدونم کی خوب میشدم.. و خیلی دوستتون دارم🫂🩵
💋35❤6🍓3💘3😭3👍2
Signed 𝑀𝒾𝓃𝓃𝒾𝑒
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @itsminnielife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 673,090 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“🏳️⚧️ Minnie (Queerism)” (@itsminnielife), 1,267 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsminnielife.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
