прямой репортаж из креативного отдела хойоверс
custom 5334976494101878954512🍓292

Channel
@itsmamamakkar
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,528subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002391662571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itsmamamakkar |
| Description | 𝙋𝘼𝙍𝙀𝙉𝙏𝘼𝙇 𝘼𝘿𝙑𝙄𝙎𝙊𝙍𝙔 𝙀𝙓𝙋𝙇𝙄𝘾𝙄𝙏 𝘾𝙊𝙉𝙏𝙀𝙉𝙏 💾 💾 💾 |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itsmamamakkar |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 5,528 | +6 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:27 | 5,522 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 5,522 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
16,328 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5334976494101878954 | 6,167 | 37.8% | |
| 🍓 | 6,063 | 37.1% | |
| custom 5199624357864815332 | 4,098 | 25.1% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16,328reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 13 June 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
прямой репортаж из креативного отдела хойоверс
custom 5334976494101878954512🍓292
мб надо было на режиссерском доучиться а не сиси жмурить
custom 5334976494101878954725🍓412custom 5199624357864815332279
шок она нахуевертила омежье гнездо
custom 5334976494101878954636🍓311custom 5199624357864815332227
стадик хз
🍓631custom 5199624357864815332289custom 5334976494101878954195
диву даюсь как смело и настойчиво «художники» юзающие нейронку показывают свои «спидпеинты» чтоб что-то пруфануть, хотя единственное что они доказывают это то, что они в душе ни единой секунды не ебут как на самом деле происходит процесс реального человеческого рисования да роднульки, мы сначала лупим лайн без единого построения начиная с носа персонажа, потом сразу рендерим кусками - сначала полностью ухо, потом пя…
custom 5199624357864815332601🍓271custom 5334976494101878954203
нет ничего ироничнее чем вдрачиваться в анатомию чтоб рисовать МЫШЦЫ чтоб РУЧИЩИ У ПЕРСОНАЖЕЙ БЫЛИ ЧТОБ УХХ чтоб СИСЬКИ чтоб МЯСО и этими же типажами фигур ирл восхищаться будучи непролеченной рппшницой у которой уже десять лет одно лишь стремление быть похожей на шестнадцатилетнего мальчика неизлечимо больного дизентерией
custom 5334976494101878954698custom 5199624357864815332281🍓202
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 5334976494101878954494🍓235custom 5199624357864815332163
свалить на один файл в кучу всё над чем работаешь, загадочно порезать чтоб ничего не было понятно, не менее загадочно вкинуть в канал.. дааа чуваки ну это арт-деко, это история…
custom 5334976494101878954722🍓383custom 5199624357864815332283
фанянон которого я долго никуда не выкладывала, потому что это была экспериментальная штука с целью «оттарабанить на скорость» которой я не шибко то довольна (как обычно), но пока нового из-за занятости не появилось - пускай всё-таки сидит здесь кукует
custom 5199624357864815332786🍓452custom 5334976494101878954276
я с этой неделей чуть не ёбнулась откровенно говоря
🍓648custom 5199624357864815332302custom 5334976494101878954208
как меня затрахали эти модные выдуманные профессии, у кого с хорошим заработком не спросишь «кем работаешь» так начинается это трёхэтажное «я мерчендайз-нейро-маркетинг-менеджер в ю джи си продакшн-агенстве консалтинга и коксакинга» вы че ебанутые
custom 5334976494101878954660🍓292custom 5199624357864815332221
ебать фурсона мидея в естественной среде обитания природа удивительна
🍓691custom 5334976494101878954311custom 5199624357864815332194
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @itsmamamakkar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 358,939 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“mthrmakkar” (@itsmamamakkar), 5,528 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsmamamakkar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.