Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ицмайлайфский

Channel

Ицмайлайфский

@itskovserge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,783subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002077811238
TypeChannel
Username@itskovserge
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itskovserge

Growth

2,7822,7832,782.57 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers11 August 2026 — 2,782 subscribers15 August 2026 — 2,783 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,782–2,783 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:242,783+1
11 Aug 2026, 10:462,782-1
7 Aug 2026, 14:022,783no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:582,783first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 1 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14m 31s
Average length
4m 50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

190 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
8042.1%
🔥5730.0%
👍1910.0%
💯147.37%
👏105.26%
🙏84.21%
🍓10.526%
😐10.526%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 190reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 1 June 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 10:27 UTC897 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Вначале июня, когда выступал на Гастрите с результатами нашей аналитики за 5 месяцев 2026 года, формировал такой тезис, что судя по сравнению с прошлым годом, наметился положительный тренд: были очевидны признаки восстановления спроса (числа транзакций). За апрель-май наметился положительный тренд. На прошлой неделе выступал на нашем тренинге для владельцев (слайд оттуда), уже показывал данные с июнем и к сожалению,

👍12💯4

29 Jun 2026, 13:07 UTC≈1,020 views21 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Друзья, всем привет! Записал небольшую видео-презентацию о штуке, которую мы придумали с коллегами в Мозге. Это будет полезно всем, для кого размер прибыли сейчас является болью (или ее минус, или убыток). Страница на скрине находится по этому адресу. Буду рад вашим вопросам!

🙏8🔥64👏2🍓1

23 Jun 2026, 09:23 UTC≈1,410 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Когда готовился к нашей ежемесячной онлайн-встрече с рестораторами (вроде форум-групп в онлайне), аналитики Mozg подготовили интересный срез по динамике выручки ресторанов в разных федеральных округах. Честно говоря, некоторые цифры меня удивили. Больше всего поразил Южный федеральный округ (-17%) и Северо-Западный (-8%). Я ожидал увидеть замедление рынка в целом, но не настолько сильную просадку выручки именно в эт

12👍5👏1😐1

15 Jun 2026, 09:02 UTC≈1,120 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Цифровая зрелость ресторанной компании. Не секрет, что в ресторанном бизнесе в основном всегда работали люди с достаточно низкими навыками использования ПК. Этот тезис может казаться дикими для какой-нибудь хипстерской кофейни внутри Садового кольца, но в целом в ресторанной индустрии цифровая продвинутость достаточно низкая. Объяснение здесь простое: исторически, поставщиками кадров в рестораны НЕ являются универси

13

11 Jun 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,230 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Коллеги, мы с Виолеттой начинаем первые шаги в организации сообщества. Решили начать с легкого формата в онлайне. Это несмотря на то, что последние несколько лет в мейнстриме форум-группы и мастер-майнды. Мы определились, что стартанем в лайт-формате, что сейчас, на мой взгляд, особенно актуально (просто и быстро). Формат простой: раз в месяц собираемся на 3 часа в онлайне. Группа небольшая (около 10 человек), заран

🔥114

8 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,020 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilovemozgFile

File, posted without a caption

🔥119

8 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC861 viewsread 7 August 2026

День закончился, было горячо! :) Всем привет с Gastreet!

8 Jun 2026, 21:38 UTC≈1,010 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @ilovemozgPhoto

Передаем привет из Сочи, с фестиваля Gastreet 🚀 Сергей Ицков выступил с темой «Главные цифры ресторанной индустрии в 2025–2026 и что с ними делать?». Спасибо всем, кто был с нами 💙 Делимся кадрами из Сочи и оставляем презентацию для всех, кто хочет разобраться в ключевых показателях индустрии и посмотреть на них через призму своего ресторана 👇🏻

13

7 Jun 2026, 09:52 UTC≈1,050 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как-то услышал фразу, которая меня сильно зацепила: «Если вы изменили своего клиента, если вы дали ему новый опыт, то он становится лояльным». Гениально и просто. Если мы создаем что-то новое для гостя, вызываем вау-эффект, то он это запоминает, потому что не ожидает. Автоматически считает вас чем-то прорывным и уникальным в его жизни. Обычно это может сопровождаться фразой «а что так можно было»? Уверен, что многие

🔥148👏7

1 Jun 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,520 views44 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Тупик финансовой модели ресторана Часть 2. Продолжаю рассуждения на тему ситуации с ресторанном бизнесом, начало нашумевшей (😊) части здесь. Итак, в прошлый раз я закончил на 2 важных тезисах: для выравнивания экономической ситуации в фин-модели ресторана нас неимоверно ждет корректировка операционных процессов или компонентов концепции. Лично я не верю, что ситуация сама-собой вернется к прежним условиям. Ведь воп

17🔥15💯10👍2

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @itskovserge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 981,408 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ицмайлайфский” (@itskovserge), 2,783 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itskovserge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.