Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ITS.CANDLE.OCLOCK

@itscandleoclock

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

21subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001638680798
TypeChannel
Username@itscandleoclock
DescriptionMay all problems burn the f**k down
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/itscandleoclock

Growth

219 August 2026 — 21 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21 subscribers9 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20–22 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 14:4721no change
9 Aug 2026, 16:1821first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 14 November 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
9
Links
1

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
21s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

27 reactions across 12 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1555.6%
🔥622.2%
❤‍🔥518.5%
13.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 27reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 14 November 2023 to 30 December 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Dec 2023, 04:23 UTC103 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Говорят, если сжечь свечу it’s candle o’clock, то записка с желаниями (даже не сгоревшая до конца и даже вставшая куском в горле) точно сработает! Поэтому Беллини в свече - Беллини во мне •750₽

❤‍🔥5

30 Dec 2023, 02:44 UTC63 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня мы на ярмарке в ТЦ «Мирамикс» до 21:00 ✨ приходите

2

26 Dec 2023, 04:15 UTC62 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Video

Ваши любимые ароматы в Арт-студии «Gold» https://t.me/goldartstudio

🔥2

24 Dec 2023, 10:19 UTC52 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Ну что ж… Подарок к Новому году конечно! Новые ароматы, новые фразы и даже с ласковым подтекстом… мы старались И вы старайтесь! Ждём Вас в ЛО с 12 до 19! •750₽

2

13 Dec 2023, 06:39 UTC60 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Давно ничего не было! Но если вы тоже сейчас боритесь с проблемами на работе (как и все) и отчёты горят, то зажгите свечку с зёлёным чаем, сожгите проблемы (ну или хотя бы часть)! •1000₽

2

29 Nov 2023, 07:43 UTC71 views1 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Хюгге - это принцип нужный не всем и не каждому? Думаем, про хюгге знают все, особенно фанаты Скандинавии. Хюгге=уют, но уют для своих, этот принцип не подходит для чужих. В одном городе мы ходили в кофейню с таким названием. Но только уют там был исключительно визуальный, в остальном уюта не было: компания бариста, компания людей за пятым столиком, а кампании по пониманию кофе и по уюту для гостей в общем-то не был

1

27 Nov 2023, 11:15 UTC58 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Большие желание=большие свечи Свечи мощные, гарантируем Соевый воск •1300₽ (Шикарное растекание в подарок)

2

23 Nov 2023, 10:40 UTC71 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Способ расслабить нервы и отпустить стресс А там ждут: шампанское, заливка собственной свечи, красота и энергия прекрасных Мари и Ренаты! •1500-2300₽ (в зависимости отобъёма свечи)

2

21 Nov 2023, 10:32 UTC62 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Для амбиций бывших! Ножницы для древесного фитиля •750₽

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @itscandleoclock. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,116,974 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ITS.CANDLE.OCLOCK” (@itscandleoclock), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itscandleoclock.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.