Channel
@itsashechka1
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
414subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001736236591 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @itsashechka1 |
| Description | • Студентка МГИМО •🇷🇺🇫🇷 🇬🇧 • Для связи: @itsashechka |
| Created | 20 December 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/itsashechka1 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 414 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 414 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 9 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
210 reactions across 9 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 157 | 74.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 13 | 6.19% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 5.24% | |
| 🤯 | 8 | 3.81% | |
| 🌚 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 💋 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 🤩 | 6 | 2.86% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 9 May 2025 to 10 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itsashechka1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 May 2025 to 10 September 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Это отдельная тема для разговора)) очень люблю общаться про поступление и готова вечно про это рассказывать! Хотите видео на эту тему? Планировала записать еще на 1⃣курсе, но заучилась и забросила эту идею. Ставьте реакции, если вам интересно☺️
❤18👍8❤🔥6🤯1
Для меня, наверное, исторические предметы 1-го курса (по типу ИГПРФ/ИГПЗС) и все, что связано с гражданским правом, но лишь потому, что мне ближе публичное право)
❤5🤯1
Да) поступала в 2022 году, сдала ЕГЭ на 100/98/94 балла
❤6👏2🤯1
💙2 месяца меня тут не было, честно сказать, они пролетели очень быстро… дел было много, а мыслей и вдохновения для постов мало. 📌За это лето многое изменилось, есть даже колоссальные перемены, о которых я пока не хочу говорить, но однозначно они к лучшему! 📚 Впереди 4 курс, самый короткий, но в то же время самый тяжелый, госы, диплом, иные экзамены, которые я планирую сдавать, поступление в магистратуру… очень много…
❤26🌚5🤯1🥰1
Интересуетесь международными отношениями? 🌏 Хотите читать англоязычные СМИ без переводчика? 🇬🇧 Канал Мировая политика как раз посвящен этим темам. В нем вы найдете множество полезных материалов по ключевым сюжетам мировой политики, а также сможете улучшить свой политический английский. 👩 Автор блога – Оксана – международник и преподаватель английского языка. Сейчас Оксана набирает учеников на групповые и индивидуа…
❤14🌚1
Закрыла сессию на отлично, и, наконец, для меня начинается долгожданное лето! 💪🏼🦋сегодня сразу после экзамена поехали учиться управлять такой спортивной яхтой🛥️
❤34🤯1
С Днём России! 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
❤18💋6🤯1
Вчера были на форуме молодых предпринимателей Заметки: 📌У оптимистов сбываются мечты, а у пессимистов кошмары 🇨🇳Китайские партнеры спикеров: «Если бы кто-то из зарубежа знал, чем вы занимаетесь и что обсуждаете в это время на форумах в Москве, они бы уже давно успокоились и начали заниматься мирными вопросами» «Вы всегда говорите, что вы сильные и независимые, но всегда смотрите на запад. Мы делаем всё по-своему…
❤17❤🔥3👍3🤯1
Ну и современные технологии! Как же здорово! Мой дедушка в самом центре, даже сейчас увидела это видео на улице на рекламных баннерах. Невероятно прекрасная задумка! (В строю показаны все его однополчане)😍🇷🇺
❤19🤩6❤🔥4🤯1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @itsashechka1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Иванова Александра” (@itsashechka1), 414 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itsashechka1.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.