Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

IT-KAMASUTRA.COM

@itkamasutra

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

6,147subscribers

-13 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001374442323
TypeChannel
Username@itkamasutra
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/itkamasutra

Growth

6,1476,1606,153.57 August 2026 — 6,160 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,160 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,159 subscribers11 August 2026 — 6,154 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,147 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net -13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,145–6,162 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 07:246,147-7
11 Aug 2026, 06:466,154-5
8 Aug 2026, 02:286,159-1
7 Aug 2026, 21:306,160no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:286,160first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
60.3%
avg views ÷ 6,147 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,710
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.563%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held18 (6 July 202626 July 2026)
Views total29,650
Reactions total167
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 03:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

279 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁9634.4%
7828.0%
🔥3914.0%
💯258.96%
🤣113.94%
🤯103.58%
👏51.79%
🫡41.43%
🤝31.08%
🐳20.717%
🙉20.717%
🤪20.717%
👌10.358%
🥴10.358%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 279reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 18 we hold a reading for · 50%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @itkamasutra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 July 2026 to 26 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 23:55 UTC≈3,070 views34 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Вообще я предельно вежлив с ИИ) не потому что боюсь (поэтому тоже), потому что в общем-то сам по себе достаточно вежливый)) Но тут сорвался 😂 Когда до 4 утра пытаешься наладить пайплайн рабочий важной для меня штуки... а он по кругу делает одни и теже ошибки (мы делаем.. вся ответственность на мне.. потмоу что мы делаем proof of concept) и пока я очень грязно вайбкожу.. Но всё же))

😁21🤣6👏2🤝2🤪21

26 Jul 2026, 14:40 UTC≈3,130 views23 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

Очень быстро нашу профессию обесценили, поддавшись эйфории. В том числе и те, кто действительно умеет структурно мыслить, тоже поддались романтике создания программных продуктов. Мол, теперь можем сделать всё сами. Но... При всём уважении к представителям бизнеса.. не можете! Все разговоры про массово пишем продукты сами разбивается о реальность и по факту никто из НЕТЕХНАРЕЙ и не создал ничего, что крутится в проде

23

26 Jul 2026, 09:26 UTC≈2,770 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Помните мигратор для файлов делал (на youtube есть VibeCoder Nigths)? Почти всё улетело в облако. Скажу честно, работа с легаси - это очень кайфово и круто качает. Разобраться в легаси-системе, запланировать вектор бесшовной эволюции... Ууух.. Интересно! Нескучно! И важно: очень ответственно! Любая легаси система от того и легаси, что давно внедрена в продакшен и всё переписать с нуля, выключить старое и включить

🔥9

20 Jul 2026, 14:44 UTC≈4,670 views30 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
File

Если бы оно работало, оно бы работало)

😁20🤣53💯2

20 Jul 2026, 08:35 UTC≈4,350 views26 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Какой же отстой этот Google Family Link! Идея огонь - ты как родитель… можешь контролить телефон ребенка. Но… сцуко… на любое действие вместо того, чтобы на моем девайсе нажать РАЗРЕШАЮ, или какой-то ВРЕМЕННЫЙ КОД, или что-то ещё, этот всеми обожаемый Гугл говорит ребенку, который в другой стране сейчас: Введи пароль, внимание.. от родительского аккаунта!! То есть от моего аккаунта. Подразумевается, что я сижу рядо

💯233

18 Jul 2026, 15:03 UTC≈4,120 views12 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Нечего делать вечером, хотите услышать моё мнение, каких 4 типа разрабов я выделяю и по-прежнему на что делаю упор, смотрите новый видос на канале https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-4bMUFuDu4

12

17 Jul 2026, 09:36 UTC≈3,990 views17 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Всего лишь час работаю со своей новой утилитой.. и.. скажу я вам.. на порядок проще, спокойнее и понятнее.. что меня ждёт, где я что делаю и что дальше! Прикооооол....

🔥141😁1🙉1

17 Jul 2026, 09:07 UTC≈3,550 views16 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

SaaS + ИИ = SaaSИИ 🤭 Увидел такой коммент на youtube под каким-то видосом, так решил поделиться этой умной мыслью 🫣 Есть вероятность, что большие гиганты со своими софтами корпоративными будут переживать дополнительные трудности, так как в этих гигантсикх СааС функций миллион, по сути они все не нужны большинству клиентов. А те функции что нужны, их немного и их можно навайбкодить. Мне близка эта идея! В частност

😁93🔥2🫡1🙉1

16 Jul 2026, 13:38 UTC≈2,560 views13 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Давно установил.. но только сейчас решил попробвоать, так как ненавижу покупать билеты на самолет, их искать, сравнивать цены.. Дал задачу расширению claude code. Надеюсь не отправит мою жену в Китай))) но пока делаю свои дела.. он там мне ищёт, кликает... кайф

😁6🔥4🐳21

16 Jul 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,460 views14 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Такс.. 2 моих синьерных разрабов и я ловим такую беду: мультизадачность, куча окон.. агентов, котоыре что-то делают и от тебя что-то хотят 🤯 Я хотел отделаться звуковым уведомлениями.. 📣 но этого мало: можно не услышать... 🔕 Ок, можно системные всплывашки делать?.. Можно.. 💬 Столкнулся с ещё одной проблемой: разные абсолютно контекнсты и проекты и я теряюсь.. на чём я где остановился. В идеале конечно свой мозг

🤯103🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 18:04 UTC≈2,490 views13 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Честно.. это какой-то звиздец... Мне безумно интересны новые технологии, новые навыки, в частности DevOps. Но.. Так впадлу начать))) Как же противится организм получать этот новый сложный кайф и говорит: иди делай рутину, работы валом, 24 на 7 делай то, что умеешь... Себе за правило беру совет, который постоянно давал студентам и котоырй начиная с этой неделе применю к себе: в выходные НИКАКОЙ РАБОТЫ. Есть силы и ж

13

15 Jul 2026, 07:42 UTC≈2,490 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026

https://www.youtube.com/live/KguIbDWPIXM?si=64uZvIUGjP0q828s Веб стандарты крутые, Ден Абрамов крутой 🫶

🔥84

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @itkamasutra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 561,545 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“IT-KAMASUTRA.COM” (@itkamasutra), 6,147 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itkamasutra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.