Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ищу тебя | Борисов

Channel

Ищу тебя | Борисов

@itborisov

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,795subscribers

+155 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001991816194
TypeChannel
Username@itborisov
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/itborisov

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 3 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@itborisov/15719 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC@lfymogilev/124329 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC1.007 minutes
@lfymogilev/144512 Nov 2026, 06:15 UTC@itborisov/17197 · this entry9 Nov 2026, 06:43 UTC1.007 days
@lfymogilev/145667 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC@itborisov/17180 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC1.00under a minute
@lfymogilev/1464311 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC@itborisov/17225 · this entry11 Nov 2026, 17:21 UTC1.00under a minute
@itgomel/95459 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC@itborisov/15719 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC1.002 minutes
@itgomel/119217 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC@itborisov/17180 · this entry7 Nov 2026, 15:38 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@lfymogilev5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutes@lfymogilev (4–1)
@itgomel5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@itgomel (4–1)
@lfygrodno5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (3–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 8 of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 112 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

6,6346,8386,7368 August 2026 — 6,640 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,634 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,660 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,670 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,676 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,675 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,703 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,700 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,708 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,745 subscribers9 September 2026 — 6,755 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,763 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,782 subscribers26 September 2026 — 6,805 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,817 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,830 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,833 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,817 subscribers23 October 2026 — 6,826 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,812 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers1 November 2026 — 6,834 subscribers5 November 2026 — 6,838 subscribers8 November 2026 — 6,822 subscribers13 November 2026 — 6,795 subscribers6,7958 August 202613 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 97 days, net +155. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,603–6,869 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Nov 2026, 13:576,795-27
8 Nov 2026, 14:086,822-16
5 Nov 2026, 00:276,838+4
1 Nov 2026, 15:166,834+20
29 Oct 2026, 15:286,814+2
26 Oct 2026, 11:366,812-14
23 Oct 2026, 01:316,826+9
20 Oct 2026, 01:196,817-16
17 Oct 2026, 10:076,833+3
14 Oct 2026, 16:476,830+13
11 Oct 2026, 13:406,817+3
4 Oct 2026, 23:586,814+9
26 Sept 2026, 05:366,805+23
17 Sept 2026, 08:176,782+19
13 Sept 2026, 11:386,763+8
9 Sept 2026, 05:586,755+10
4 Sept 2026, 01:166,745+37
31 Aug 2026, 08:446,708+8
28 Aug 2026, 18:176,700-3
25 Aug 2026, 22:376,703first reading

Engagement

190 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.9%
avg views ÷ 6,795 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,300
114 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.448%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
115
of 190 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 113 of 114 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held190 (7 August 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total262,240
Reactions total1,174
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Nov 2026, 16:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
19s
Average length
10s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,062 reactions across 186 posts, in 54 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤60929.5%
🍓31515.3%
🤣1808.73%
💘1527.37%
💋1095.29%
🔥974.70%
😢803.88%
❤‍🔥633.06%
😍512.47%
😭472.28%
😱401.94%
💔331.60%
🥱251.21%
🤔231.12%
🥰231.12%
👀160.776%
🌚150.727%
🗿150.727%
🎃130.63%
👻120.582%
34 further kinds1446.98%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 187 of the 190 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,062 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 190 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 115 posts held from the last 30 days (3.48%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

12 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC275 viewsread 12 November 2026

всем привет, кто знает лучше идти в тему или в триумф? может у нас есть еще какие-то театральные студии (для детей, подростков)? и по суме сколько вообще

12 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC275 views0 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Кто хочет сходить погулять в районе 4 поликлинике лет 15-16 ( я мальчик) админу печеньку

12 Nov 2026, 12:26 UTC≈1,450 views12 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Кто потерял собачку? Бегает в районе медицинского колледжа — ГДК. Ранее её не наблюдала, только сегодня бегает за всеми хвостиком 🥹

😢8❤3🍓1

12 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,620 views8 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Приветик,знаю,что не по теме,но очень интересно узнать кто то пойдет на дк в воскресенье? Просто с подругой хотели пойти ну думаю в воскресенье может и народа мало будет

❤5🍓3

12 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,590 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Извините что не по теме, ищу с кем можно погулять с 17-19 лет желательно девочку ( я девочка)

❤2🍓2

12 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Здравствуйте потерял кошелек с деньгами в сумму 500 рублей и карточки приор и альфа в районе алми которая на Гагарина

❤2🍓2

12 Nov 2026, 11:47 UTC≈1,580 views4 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ищу этого парня ехали вместе на 7а Очень понравился,стоял что то ждал на жд время 11:30-11:40.Анон,админу путевку на Майями

❤2🍓2

12 Nov 2026, 11:46 UTC≈1,550 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

ищу парня. 11.11 ехал на 37-м автобусе, вышел на остановке стадион в 16:35, найдись 🙏🏻

🍓2😢2❤1

12 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC≈1,980 views7 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

Ищу мальчика,ехал на 22 в 7:27,хочу познакомится, очень понравился

❤6🔥1

12 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC≈1,950 views5 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Ищу девушку, ехала в 11 маршрутке, 7 утра, вышла на стадионе, ты потрясно выглядишь) была в черных брюках, голубой куртке, реснички нарощенные и пробит носик, черненькая сумочка и цвет волос Анонимно

❤5

12 Nov 2026, 05:19 UTC≈1,940 views6 reactionsread 12 November 2026
Photo

чей телефон, лежал на асфальте остановке мед колледж, оставили на вахте мед колледжа

❤3🍓2❤‍🔥1

11 Nov 2026, 20:02 UTC≈2,170 views19 reactionsread 12 November 2026

Извините что не в тему, возможно ли вообще отдельно жить в 14 лет от родителей? если будет согласия со стороны родителей, и на каком сайте лучше находить квартиры в борисове?

😱12❤2🤓2🤨2🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 190 posts we hold for @itborisov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @itborisov as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
6 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
6 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
17 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ищу тебя | Борисов” (@itborisov), 6,795 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itborisov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.