6 measurements spanning 6 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,919–13,936 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 04:48
13,927
-7
11 Aug 2026, 03:15
13,934
+6
10 Aug 2026, 05:36
13,928
+5
9 Aug 2026, 05:52
13,923
-2
7 Aug 2026, 04:07
13,925
+4
6 Aug 2026, 16:16
13,921
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.88%
avg views ÷ 13,927 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,100
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.345%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 29 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
29 (23 July 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
31,813
Reactions total
106
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 11:33 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,600
Videos
≈145
Links
≈4,290
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
16m 51s
Average length
16m 51s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
106 reactions across 26 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
42
39.6%
❤
33
31.1%
👏
8
7.55%
🙏
8
7.55%
🔥
7
6.60%
🤩
4
3.77%
😍
3
2.83%
👌
1
0.943%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#فاندامنتال | #نقره
🗓️۲۰ مرداد
📊 نقره هنوز از نظر عرضه و تقاضا حمایت میشود، اما یک ریسک جدی دارد.
بازار نقره برای ششمین سال متوالی با کسری عرضه روبهروست؛ اما قیمتهای بالا باعث شده تولیدکنندگان پنلهای خورشیدی مصرف نقره را کاهش دهند و به سمت مس و ترکیب مس-نقره بروند.
حالا سؤال اصلی این است: رشد تقاضای برق، خودرو و الکترونیک میتواند کاهش مصرف در پنلهای خورشیدی را جبران کند؟
در کوتاهمدت هم همه نگاهها به تورم …
#فاندامنتال | #نفت
🗓️۱۹ مرداد
🛢 مشکل نفت فقط بسته بودن هرمز نیست؛ ترس از عبور هم بهاندازه خودش مهمه.
تردد در هرمز هنوز خیلی پایینتر از حالت عادیه و بعد از حملات اخیر، حتی در بابالمندب هم رفتوآمد کشتیها نوسان شدیدی داشته.
یعنی حتی اگر روی کاغذ مسیر باز باشه، وقتی نفتکشها، بیمهگرها و شرکتهای حملونقل حاضر به پذیرش ریسک نباشن، اختلال عرضه عملاً ادامه پیدا میکنه.
از طرف دیگه، بحران سوخت روسیه هم جدیتر شده و ب…
به نظر شما مهمترین محرک قیمت طلا در این هفته کدام است؟
گزارش تورم چهارشنبه49%
تحولات خاورمیانه و هرمز31%
روند دلار و بازدهی اوراق24%
ادامه موج رکودی بازار کار14%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🥇 وبینار «رادار طلا»؛ ابزار قدرتمند شما در معاملات طلا
هفته جدید رو با چشم بسته شروع نکنید! تو این ۴ جلسه تخصصی، قراره نبض بازار طلا رو قبل از باز شدن مارکت بگیریم.
🔍 قراره چیکار کنیم؟
• تحلیل دادههای کلیدی فاندامنتال و اخبار موثر بر بازار
• بررسی تخصصی چارت طلا و چیدن سناریوهای احتمالی پیشرو
🗓 شروع جلسه دوم: یکشنبه ۱۸ مرداد | ساعت ۲۰:۰۰
ظرفیت وبینار محدوده؛ برای ثبتنام روی لینک زیر کلیک کنید:
🔗 ثبتنام
#تحلیل_هفتگی | #طلا
🥇 طلا بعد از رشد ۷٪ وارد هفته حساسی شده.
هفته قبل ضعف بازار کار آمریکا، افت دلار و کاهش بازدهی اوراق به نفع طلا بود. اما این هفته تورم آمریکا میتونه مشخص کنه این شرایط ادامه پیدا میکنه یا ورق برمیگرده.
از طرف دیگه، ریسک خاورمیانه هنوز کاملاً از بازار خارج نشده؛ یعنی طلا همزمان از سمت فدرال رزرو، دلار و اخبار ژئوپلیتیک تحت فشاره.
برای این هفته، دو سؤال مهم وجود داره:
🔍 از نظر فاندامنتال، ط…
#تحلیل_هفتگی | #بازار
🗓️۱۷ مرداد
📊 این هفته یک عدد میتونه جهت بازار رو عوض کنه: تورم آمریکا
هفته قبل، آمار ضعیف اشتغال آمریکا باعث شد دلار عقبنشینی کنه، طلا رشد کنه و بازار سهام هم جان بگیره.
حالا همه نگاهها به CPI چهارشنبهست؛ شاخصی که نشون میده تورم آمریکا هنوز بالاست یا نه.
اگر CPI پایینتر از انتظار بیاد، فشار روی دلار میتونه بیشتر بشه و این به نفع طلا و سهام تموم میشه.
اما اگر تورم بالا باشه، احتمال ا…
#فاندامنتال | #مس
🗓️۱۶ مرداد
📌 مس؛ فلزی که با هوش مصنوعی دوباره به مرکز توجه برگشته
فعلاً سه عامل اصلی پشت بازار مس قرار دارند:
۱. عرضه هنوز محدوده
موجودی انبارهای LME پایین مانده و عرضه از شیلی و بعضی معادن بزرگ هم کمتر از انتظار بوده. یعنی بازار هنوز با کمبود نسبی مس روبهروست.
۲. هوش مصنوعی، تقاضای تازه ساخته
دیتاسنترها، شبکه برق، زیرساختهای AI و خودروهای برقی مصرف مس را بالا نگه داشتهاند. حالا دیگر فقط چین…
#تکنیکال | #شاخص_دلار
🗓️۱۵ مرداد
📉 دلار ضعیف شده؛ اما هنوز برای قضاوت زود است.
رشد اقتصادی آمریکا پایینتر از انتظار بازار منتشر شد و همین موضوع، فشار فروش روی شاخص دلار را افزایش داد. نتیجه این ضعف، بهبود نسبی شرایط برای داراییهایی مانند طلا، نقره و بیتکوین بود.
حالا تمرکز بازار روی دادههای اشتغال آمریکاست. گزارش ضعیف میتواند افت دلار را عمیقتر کند؛ در مقابل، اشتغال قوی میتواند بخشی از این کاهش را جبران کند…
#فاندامنتال | #نفت
🗓️۱۲ مرداد
🛢 نفت میان جنگ و مذاکره گیر افتاده است
ترامپ از تهدید زیرساختهای ایران به ادعای مذاکره رسیده؛ اما همزمان، اخبار متناقض از تنگه هرمز و حملات تازه به تأسیسات روسیه، ریسک عرضه را زنده نگه داشتهاند.
حالا بازار نفت با دو مسیر کاملاً متفاوت روبهروست:
تشدید جنگ و جهش قیمت، یا مذاکره جدی و فشار فروش بیشتر.
🔗 کدام سناریو محتملتر است؟ تحلیل کامل را بخوانید.
🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @itbfxpersian. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
به نظر شما مهمترین محرک قیمت طلا در این هفته کدام است؟
گزارش تورم چهارشنبه49%
تحولات خاورمیانه و هرمز31%
روند دلار و بازدهی اوراق24%
ادامه موج رکودی بازار کار14%
The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 87,821 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“بروکر فارکس | ITBFX” (@itbfxpersian), 13,927 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/itbfxpersian.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.